Help talk:Template: Difference between revisions
m (→Adding a navigation between most the templates: De-linking deleted template.) |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 98: | Line 98: | ||
{{User:YoshiKong/sig}} 04:01, 14 December 2012 (EST) | {{User:YoshiKong/sig}} 04:01, 14 December 2012 (EST) | ||
==Fix this== | |||
I found incorrect grammer in the second sentence of the article "These templates HAS links that are directly or indirectly related to a topic. |
Revision as of 09:58, April 5, 2013
page’s
This is just my opinion, but personally I think this should be changed to "page's". Caps Lock LORD 15:31, 23 February 2007 (EST)
how do you change the background of your user page?purifiedaFile:SuperMushroom.png
Template:SettledTPP DON'T CREATE TEMPLATE 1-6
I think even templates deserve a navigation, so readers and editors could easily navigate between them.
Proposer: Megadardery (talk)
Deadline: December 22, 2012, 23:59 GMT
Support
- Megadardery (talk) per my propose
Oppose
- YoshiKong (talk) Personally, I don't think we need a huge nav template to hold together all our templates. And if we did, your proposal is missing Video templates, Category:Media Templates, Category:Formatting Templates, Category:ImageMap Templates, Category:Internal Link Templates, Category:Userbox Templates and Category:Navigation Templates themselves. Asides from that, we already have Category:MarioWiki Templates and many subcategories beyond that to organize them all. And where are you proposing that you put such a navigation template? I can't see this going on each and every one of the 500+ templates on the wiki. Categories are more logical.
- Walkazo (talk) - Per YoshiKong.
- Marshal Dan Troop (talk) per all
- Mario4Ever (talk) Per all.
- BowserJunior (talk) Per all.
- Phoenix (talk) Per all.
Comments
The nav template has kind of been taken from my design here... but that's okay. YoshiKong (talk) 06:59, 9 December 2012 (EST)
- I really never-ever visited your Userspace before. Megadardery (talk)
I solved -almost- everything you said YoshiKong
- "I don't think we need a huge nav template to hold together all our templates"
- Why? Navigation is awesome everywhere.
- "Your proposal is missing Video templates, Media Templates, Formatting Templates, ImageMap Templates, Internal Link Templates, Userbox Templates and Navigation Templates themselves."
- I added them all except the following:
- Video templates : I don't think I should add it; it is a subcategory of Media Templates
- Navigation Templates : I already have a template for this, but if you think it should be merged with This template just point here.
- I added them all except the following:
- "We already have Category:MarioWiki Templates and many subcategories beyond that to organize them all"
- It is called "Navigation Template" not "Categorize Template"?! We need it to help the users navigate "quickly" between them.
- "I can't see this going on each and every one of the 500+ templates on the wiki."
- I'm only missing the templates that are having no Category?! and I'm having very hard time collecting 'em, but I'm still working. I think it can be added and improved later.Megadardery (talk)
- Alright, but I still disagree with the whole idea. Also you misunderstood me on that last point. My statement was where did you propose to put such a template? And them I said "I can't see this going on each and every one of the 500+ templates on the wiki." ("this" being your proposed nav template). YoshiKong (talk) 16:22, 10 December 2012 (EST)
{{Moveto}}
Is there a template for a proposed moving of an article, like {{Mergeto}}?-BowserJunior (talk) forgot to sign.
- No, and shouldn't exist. As Autoconfirmed users can move unprotected artcles. Plus protected from moving articles should not be moved!! -- 03:54, 14 December 2012 (EST)
I think it's worth considering. A move is as important as a merge/split, and it would be useful to provide a notice about it on the article page. Feel free to make a proposal for it, or ask an admin for their opinion.
Shokora (talk · edits) 04:01, 14 December 2012 (EST)
Fix this
I found incorrect grammer in the second sentence of the article "These templates HAS links that are directly or indirectly related to a topic.