MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive/27: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Reddragon19k (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1,058: | Line 1,058: | ||
@ Yoshiwaker I meant the smash bros. info. {{unsigned|Superfiremario}} | @ Yoshiwaker I meant the smash bros. info. {{unsigned|Superfiremario}} | ||
}} | |||
===Super Mario Advance=== | |||
<span style="color:red;font-family:Comic Sans MS;font-size:150%">LEAVE AS IS 2-13</span> | |||
We have articles for [[Super Mario 64 DS]] and [[Super Mario Bros. Deluxe]] and even [[Donkey Kong Original Edition]].But why not any gamein the Super Mario Advance (series). Alot of theses games are alot diffrent than the originals. Espically the 4th.Something nees to be done.Either delete DK:The Original Edition of do whats mentioned above.Thank you. | |||
{{scrollbox|content= | |||
'''Proposer''': {{User|Ryandavhet}}<br> | |||
'''Deadline''': August 22, 2011, 23:59 GMT | |||
====Support==== | |||
#{{User|Toad85}} Per proposal. There's enough different about the games that should guarantee their own pages. If not, who's up for deleting Super Mario Bros. Deluxe and Donkey Kong: Original Edition? Oh, and how about we delete [[Wii Family Edition]] or [[Blue Toad]]? | |||
#{{User|Conanshinichi}} per Toad85. | |||
====Oppose==== | |||
#{{User|Supremo78}} - The only reason we have those is because those games have major changes. For example, SM64DS gained 3 new characters, all new missions, and added minigames. For SMBD, there were all new enemies, and there was a world you went on to go to different different levels, just like SMB3. Super Mario Advance series only has minor differences, and if there was a SMA (series), that would just really make a stub. And honestly, I don't know why DKOE has its own article. | |||
#{{User|Jjrapper100}} Per Supremo78. | |||
#{{User|Walkazo}} - Per Supremo78; per the reasons given for merging the pages in the first place, and keeping them that way until now (for reference, [[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive_24#Remake_Exclusive.3F|here's a failed attempt]] to re-split them from last December). Also, ''Donkey Kong Original Edition'' should be merged as soon as this proposal is over. | |||
#{{User|DKPetey99}} Per Supremo78. Also, in the ''Super Mario'' Advance games, many new additions are added. Thus, making the games different. | |||
#{{User|Super Yoshi Bros. 3}} All that changes is a couple of sprites, the fact that it is now a GBA game, and the 2-player Mario Bros that they stick on it. | |||
#{{User|Mariomario64}} – Per Supremo78 and Walkazo. | |||
#{{User|Jazama}} Per all | |||
#{{User|Reddragon19k}} Per S78 and Walk! This is a failed attempt so, per everyone as well! | |||
#{{User|Jman2401}} Per Supremo78 and Per all. Also Super mario Advance is just a collection with minor diffrences | |||
#{{User|Loxo}}Per Suremo78 | |||
#{{User|Fawfulfury65}} Per all. | |||
#{{User|Bowser's luma}} Per all. | |||
#{{User|YoshiGo99}} Per all. | |||
====Comment==== | |||
I might be willing to support if the articles you linked to weren't red links. {{User|Reversinator}} | |||
Wait your proposal doesn't give the option to not delete the Donkey Kong Original edition article. Because as you say in your proposal either we delete the Donkey Kong Original Edition article or give the Super Mario Advance series articles, so theirs no option to simply not give the Super Mario Advance series separate articles. {{User|Goomba's Shoe15}} | |||
I've got the Donkey Kong Original edition text saved in a Word document, just in case. {{User|Super Yoshi Bros. 3}} | |||
'''Toad85:''' While ''[[Donkey Kong Original Edition]]'' can be deleted, ''[[Super Mario Bros. Deluxe]]'' should be left alone because it is more than a remake, as it includes both ''SMB'' and ''[[Super Mario Bros.: The Lost Levels]]'', as well as a handful of new features. Similarly, we have an article for ''[[Super Mario All-Stars]]'', since it's a collection of four games and can't be placed on any one of the originals' articles, nor split amongst them as that leads to repetitive and/or fragmented coverage of the compilation game. - {{User|Walkazo}} | |||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 19:22, August 22, 2011
Recipe ImagesLEAVE AS IS 3-7 I've noticed an inconcistency with the images for the recipes. You can even look now at many of them. Many of them are quite alike, but they are different to the others alike. This has caused not only constant headaches with users like myself, but also more work for every user to do. Just go to here and notice how each image is [[File:PaperMario Items <itemname>.png]] for the most part (as some are like .gif and .jpg). This is a great example - for the most part - of what I am talking about. Now go to here or here, and notice how many images are like [[File:<itemname> PM2.png/PNG]], [[File:<itemname>TTYD.png/PNG]], [[File:<nameitem>TTYD.png/PNG]], [[File:<itemnickname>.png/PNG]], [[File:<itemname> SPM.png/PNG]], and then even images for items that are used for more than one game because there isn't a image found! My point I'm trying to come across is that many of our pages have had major work done on them because of this inconsistency, as well as editing them now being a major pain-in-the-neck. Changing them to something that will work out for all of them ([[File:PaperMario Items <itemname>.png]], [[File:<itemname> PM2.png]], and [[File:<itemname> SPM.png]] are what the ideal file names would be), we'll be able to create these pages more efficently, as well as editing further pages be a lot more smoother and less time-consuming. As an example, this is more efficent way of making images easier, as the template already holds the key factors ([[File:PaperMario Items <itemname>.png]]) in it, which would allow the editor just to simply put in the item name. And for the pages that don't use that template, it will still allow easier editing since they would have to only put the key factors and the item name instead of looking up the image and copying it into a page. The downside to all of this is that many of the pages already having these mix-matched file names would need to be fixed and updated to the latest things. Hopefully it won't take much time, and I already have it planned to quickly update each page before it ends up as a project that will take more than a few days. If the proposal pass, I'll start immediately on working, and hopefully have some help to get it down. That is the only downside I can see to this passing afaik. Even if it takes some work, it is better to have consistency then have all this annoying work done if it could be much simplier. Template:Scrollbox Remove Staff PagesKEEP PAGES 2-16 The title explains it all. I feel that the staff pages for the games are not needed in the fact that they are not really about "Mario" himself. We talk about Mario here, not about the people who made the games. People who play the games can know who made the game and all of that kind of stuff. But when we're talking about Mario on the Super Mario Wiki, these staff pages have no business being created. Template:Scrollbox Merge all Donkey Kong sidebar lists with Mario listsMERGE DONKEY KONG LISTS 10-3 This proposal started off as a TPP, which I said the list of Donkey Kong bosses with the Mario bosses list. Goomba's Shoe15 than told me in the comments that we need to merge all other Donkey Kong lists to prevent inconsistency. I liked the idea, and then created this proposal. EDIT: Just to clear up some confusion, I mean the side bar lists such as, Games, Characters, Allies, etc. I don't want to merge the categories. Template:Scrollbox Remove Logos from Infobox TitlesREMOVE 17-4 Quite a few games have logos instead of plain text for their infobox titles, but seeing as the game boxart also contains the logo and is located directly beneath the title, all this really does is show us the exact same graphic twice. This is redundant, and it looks sloppy, especially when the logos are transparent and the background colour interferes with the words. It's also inconsistent, since most games just use good ol' fashioned text. Compare Mario Kart DS with Mario Kart: Double Dash!! - there's no question as to which one looks more professional, and by extension, which style we should use. Other games using the superfluous title-logos include Super Mario Sunshine, Super Mario Galaxy, all three Mario & Sonic at the Olympic Games titles, Mario Party 8, Mario Kart Wii and both Super Smash Bros. Melee and Brawl, among others. Then you have the occasional character page with a title-logo, which is completely unnecessary. The only time it makes sense to have logos is for series pages, since a single boxart isn't adequately representative of all the games involved. Some example of this logo usage are Super Smash Bros. (series), Mario Party (series), and Mario Kart (series) (compare with Mario Kart DS), but even then, the logos are being used as the infobox images, not the titles. And, while the consoles don't really the logos in their images, the transparency issue is still a problem, and the inconsistency with other types of pages is also undesirable, so it'd be better of the logos were simply used elsewhere. In short, I propose we remove all instances where the logos are being used for the infobox titles. The logos can be put into the galleries (or incorporated into the body text, as is the case with the character and console pages), so nothing is being lost. Series pages with logos being used as their images will not be affected. Artwork Transparency IssuesREMOVE BAD TRANSPARENT IMAGES 25-20 During the past set of months, I've been noticing that a good number of JPEG artworks were being replaced by PNG artworks with transparent backgrounds. However, a lot of those images look quite ugly when they're viewed in backgrounds that aren't colored white. I've mentioned this dilemma at the admins boards, and some of the Sysops there do agree with my statement. I propose that any artworks with ugly-looking transparency has to lose the transparency. After all, we shouldn't be modifying the artworks by any means; if the artworks are JPEGs, upload them as JPEGs; if the PNG artworks don't have anything transparent, upload them that way. Update: To understand what's going on, please look here for examples of good transparency and bad transparency. Template:Scrollbox Merge the non-game lists on the side bar with the video game listsMERGE SIDEBAR LISTS 8-0 I find it very weird that this wiki considers the non-game elements canon but still keeps them separate on the side bar so i think we should merge the two lists together because if everything is official/canon than they should be on the same list. Because right now the two lists separates the game and non-game elements on these lists and i don't think we should do that. Plus we already merged all of the non-game categories so i think it only makes sense to merge the lists two Template:Scrollbox Reform MarioWiki:ProposalsLEAVE AS IS 11-20 As two old users, we jointly feel that the decision-making system pre-MarioWiki:Proposals was superior to the current system. The current system of MarioWiki:Proposals is based upon popularity contests. The previous system involved discussion on the Community Portal and Talk:Main page. This new proposal would restore any potential problems to be discussed on Talk:Main page, not with "support" and "oppose" columns, but genuine ”bona fide” arguments and discussion. When consensus has been reached, the fate of the "proposal" will be decided. This was the way the system worked before the infamous and perfidious troll A Link to the Past (talk) tricked Porplemontage (talk) and Wayoshi (talk) into creating the proposals (only after his disastrous MarioWiki:Peer Review scheme had failed; Proposals were made largely as a concession to his whining). If this measure passes, it shall go into force July 17, 2011, although any Proposals that still need to expire will be left to expire at their natural time. EDIT: MarioWiki:Proposals will still serve as the main place for talk page proposals. Many thanks to Goomba's Shoe15 (talk) for bringing that up. MLA FormatLEAVE AS IS 2-13 All articles should be written with the most updated version of MLA Format. This will help in the eternal preservation of always citing your sources. Cover Mario KnockoffsDON'T COVER 1-20 The Super Mario Wiki is a place where everything Mario should be covered. I have checked and we have done well. However, we have only covered the licensed things (as far as I know). The unlicensed things have not been touched. I am talking about knockoff games. Games like Mobario, the mobile "Mario" game for phones and the Great Giana Sisters, the peculiar platform game about two punk girls named Giana and Maria. Since we are the Mario wiki, we should cover everything Mario, licensed or not. Change the Gallery pages' names from "Gallery:(page name)" to "(page name)/Gallery"LEAVE AS IS 0-20 The Gallery pages will look better if are labeled as the glitches, beta elements and staff ones. They look different by their names. DK WikiLEAVE AS IS 7-44 Well, I think that there shouldn't be Donkey Kong things here. Why? Beacause its caled Super MARIO wiki, not Super MARIO AND DONKEY KONG Wiki! Right? Yeah, thats right! Another wiki could be made, and it just needs ALOT of copy and pasting. Here, look: New rule for imagesLEAVE AS IS 1-19 As you can see, the PNGs have better quality than JPGs. And I've seen some good quality PNG artwork get replaced with JPGs with worse quality & I think it's best to have images with the best possible quality. So I suggest that we add a new rule. The rule is that we don't allow PNG artwork to be converted to JPGs so that the quality of the images are better. Delete the FollowingDO NOT DELETE 0-21
All these pages are rather hidden and very unneeded; for example, the troll page is unnecessary because users will figure out what is a troll if they never heard of one, I have. I stumble across all these pages when I typed down in the search "How can I be an admin?" and it was in a pile of search results, AFTER I tweak the search options a bit. I suggest to copy, paste, and alter the information into Userpedia. A few of those pages have a list of questions, so in this proposal, it proposes to move those questions to the FAQ page. A few of them have a link to the list of current admins, sysops, bureaucrats, etc. I propose to move those links into the welcome letter every user now gets for easy access just in case of a situation of sorts. Note: For all you opposers, what do you propose to do with these pages about the part that they are hidden? PerrowDELETED In a lot of galleries, people use "<perrow>" Some of the use is necessary because the gallery section has 30+ pictures. Most of it is used for sections with less than fifteen pictures. I think we should make a new rule. This rule would be called "Perrow". Perrow
Reality vs. FictionREMOVE GENERIC ITEMS THAT DO NOT DIFFERENTIATE FROM THEIR REAL WORLD COUNTERPARTS 40-0 I was going to make this a Writing Guideline, but I figured I'd get some approval via proposal before I created my draft. A new trend on the wiki is to create articles on generic objects, like Tennis Ball, Basketball Hoop, and Cage. The main problem with this is where does it stop? Allowing these articles could be precedent for a number of useless generic articles being created, such as Template:Fakelink, Template:Fakelink, Template:Fakelink, etc.. MarioWiki is also not a dictionary. We don't need articles on real world objects. I believe we should set a restriction for which of these generic articles can and can't be created. We should only allow articles on generic subjects that have a function which is different from the real world counterpart. Examples of generic object articles that would be allowed:
Examples of generic object articles that would not be allowed:
If this proposal passes I will move on to my next step, creating a Writing Guideline concerning this. Using Another Country's BoxartDO NOT USE ONLY AMERICAN BOX ARTS 3-31 As you can see, many articles such as (New Super Mario Bros. Wii, Mario Smash Football, Mario Strikers Charged Football) and many more game articles are using other country's boxart and naming them as in that country such as Mario Strikers Charged Football even though in America we call it (Mario Strikers Charged) No Football I understand that the first English country goes first but I think we should make it the American verison instead and am not saying that we take off all the information from another country but just to change the name of the game by the American verison and change the boxart of the game to the American verison only not much more if possible. SmashWikiLEAVE AS IS 4-26 Since the game Super Smash Bros. has a similar name with Super Mario Bros., people thought it was a Mario title. So people created a Super Smash Bros. page on MarioWiki. Then someone created a number of useless articles such as Zelda and Lucario. MarioWiki should not have articles about Pokemon and Zelda, that is the work of Bulbapedia and ZeldaWiki. There is even a SmashWiki to hold Super Smash Bros. information. All of the info in MarioWiki on Super Smash Bros. should be about Mario characters only. We should remove all Pokemon and Zelda articles. Super Mario AdvanceLEAVE AS IS 2-13 We have articles for Super Mario 64 DS and Super Mario Bros. Deluxe and even Donkey Kong Original Edition.But why not any gamein the Super Mario Advance (series). Alot of theses games are alot diffrent than the originals. Espically the 4th.Something nees to be done.Either delete DK:The Original Edition of do whats mentioned above.Thank you. |