Template talk:Vacation: Difference between revisions
UltraMario (talk | contribs) |
m (→Don't Delete) |
||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
#{{User|Phoenix}} This template is perfectly acceptable to have around, I see no viable reason whatsoever to remove it. | #{{User|Phoenix}} This template is perfectly acceptable to have around, I see no viable reason whatsoever to remove it. | ||
#{{User|UltraMario3000}} I do agree. And most users use this anyways. | #{{User|UltraMario3000}} I do agree. And most users use this anyways. | ||
#{{User|Goomba's Shoe15}} having this template causes no harm to this site there really isn't a reason to remove it | |||
===Commentary=== | ===Commentary=== |
Revision as of 18:48, May 14, 2011
This talk page or section has a conflict or question that needs to be answered. Please try to help and resolve the issue by leaving a comment. |
If I recall correctly, we don't have templates just for users. Should this be deleted?
The preceding unsigned comment was added by Reversinator (talk).
- No KS3 (talk · contribute)
- Do you have a reason to say no? I think it should be deleted. Very few people seem to use it anyway. Fawfulfury65
- Only one person uses it. To me, this seems really useless. Hello, I'm Time Turner.
- Alot of people use it. and we do have a another template. Gone template? ring a bell? GalladeBlades
- Two people isn't a lot. And only one person uses the gone template. There's no point to having these templates. Hello, I'm Time Turner.
- Alot of people use it. and we do have a another template. Gone template? ring a bell? GalladeBlades
- Only one person uses it. To me, this seems really useless. Hello, I'm Time Turner.
- Do you have a reason to say no? I think it should be deleted. Very few people seem to use it anyway. Fawfulfury65
Delete Template:Vacation
This talk page section contains an unresolved talk page proposal. Please try to help and resolve the issue by voting or leaving a comment. |
Current time: Friday, November 29, 2024, 22:19 GMT
Really? A notice template for users only? If is mainly user oriented, I say we should delete. And if you really want a template like this, I suggest you make it yourself in your userpage. If you can make it yourself in your userpage, then I say this template is useless.
- Proposer:BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)
- Deadline: 26 May 2011, 23:58 GMT
Delete
- BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) There's really no reason to have this template if you can make it yourself. And notice templates should be just mainspace only.
- Mario4Ever (talk) Per proposal.
- Superfiremario (talk) We shouldn't have user templates like this
- LeftyGreenMario (talk) Although it is funny, it doesn't help the wiki in any way. Besides, we can make our own templates, right?
- Mariomario64 (talk) A few days back, I was actually thinking of making a proposal or something to delete this, since it seems kinda useless. Per BLOF and LGM.
- Bop1996 (talk) My initial reaction went something like, "What about all those users that are using this template?" After I used the "What Links Here" button however, I discovered that the only user using it is Walkazo, and she's returning before the deadline of this TPP... So yeah, I think there is not a good reason to keep it.
- Reddragon19k (talk) Lose it! Per all.
- Zero777 (talk) It shouldn't even be asked, per all.
Don't Delete
- Phoenix (talk) This template is perfectly acceptable to have around, I see no viable reason whatsoever to remove it.
- UltraMario3000 (talk) I do agree. And most users use this anyways.
- Goomba's Shoe15 (talk) having this template causes no harm to this site there really isn't a reason to remove it
Commentary
It can't be used in mainspace? Why Mario no get vacation time? XzelionETC
If this is deleted, does that mean {{Gone}} is deleted, too. I need that template in case I get angry again! DKPetey99TCE
- Probably. Just create a status box in your userpage and say that you're gone. You don't need that template unless you're lazy, but laziness is bad. Ray Trace(T|C)
Since it's pending deletion, I will put up the to be deleted template. DKPetey99 19:43, 12 May 2011 (EDT)