MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Dimentio: Difference between revisions
m (Porplemontage moved page MarioWiki:Featured Articles/Unfeature/N1/Dimentio to MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Dimentio: Fix) |
|||
(61 intermediate revisions by 26 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]=== | ===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]=== | ||
{{ | {{UNFANOMFAIL | ||
|nominated=22:20, 24 February 2011 (EST) | |nominated=22:20, 24 February 2011 (EST) | ||
| | |lastedit=22:20, May 24th, 2011 | ||
|nosupport=true | |||
}} | }} | ||
==== Remove Featured Article Status ==== | ==== Remove Featured Article Status ==== | ||
#{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} | #{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} Everything seems to be fixed, but the very last section needs images very badly. | ||
#{{user|SWFlash}} Some of the images are in bad quality. | |||
#{{User|Doopliss42}} Per all. I think this article sucks! | |||
#{{User|Superfiremario}} Per Doopliss42. | |||
#{{User|Nicke8}} Per SWFlash. | |||
#{{User|Pie4ever0}} Dimentio isn't a big enough character in the Mario Series. Why should he be a Featured Article when he's only been in SPM, while characters like Yoshi, who have made appearances in countless Mario games, are going unfeatured? (Also Per Doopliss42) | |||
#{{User|BoygeyDude}}I Hate Dimentio. >:( Per all. | |||
==== Keep Featured Article Status ==== | ==== Keep Featured Article Status ==== | ||
#{{User|SolarBlaze}}: As I said earlier, I went ahead and corrected the article's errors, so I'm going to go ahead and place my vote on keeping its Featured Article status. | #{{User|SolarBlaze}}: As I said earlier, I went ahead and corrected the article's errors, so I'm going to go ahead and place my vote on keeping its Featured Article status. | ||
#{{User|New Super Mario}}: This article has good quality. It's a pretty decent size, has good grammar, and images. | |||
#{{User|Yoshidude99}}: Per New Super Mario. | |||
#{{User|MrConcreteDonkey}}: Per all. | |||
#{{User|Iggykoopa}} per all also this article doesn't suck its good and has enough info | |||
#{{User|Mario4Ever}} I fixed the tense issue yesterday. Overall, the article is well-written, informative, and pleasing to the eye. It's definitely one of the best this wiki has to offer. | |||
#{{User|SuperYoshiBros}} Personally, I think this is a very good article. It has images, and it also is very long, so I think we should keep it as a Featured Articles. | |||
#{{User|Catboy41}} As much as I hate Dimentio, the article does indeed meet the requirements. I think it should still be featured. | |||
#{{User|Kooperfan21}}:This article is descriptive, an appropriate size, and has good pictures, not to mention its one of the most important articles due to Dimentio being a major and sybolic villain. Overall it should stay. | |||
#{{User|UltraMario3000}} Per all. | |||
#{{User|Mario7727}} | |||
#{{User|Mr. 1-UP}} This is a very impressively written article with great picture's and great writting, overall it should stay. | |||
#{{User|Tails777}} per all | |||
==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ==== | ==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ==== | ||
==== Comments ==== | ==== Comments ==== | ||
Line 29: | Line 43: | ||
The present/past-tense errors have been corrected. | The present/past-tense errors have been corrected. | ||
{{User|SolarBlaze}} | {{User|SolarBlaze}} | ||
:Really? I still see some past tense verbs. {{User|LeftyGreenMario}} | |||
BLOF, By "good quality" I mean that I beleive that it seems lenghty enough and seems interesting to read. {{User|New Super Mario}} | |||
:But is the quality of the writing good? I am forced to support unfeaturing this if the article is filled with bad grammar. {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} | |||
@BLOF: I'll go and look for grammar mistakes I missed and fix them. {{User|New Super Mario}} | |||
I hardly found anything with grammar. And I gave some reason to my vote. {{User|New Super Mario}} | |||
:@SKMarioMan: Could you pinpoint an area where information is sparse for us? That way, we know what to fix. {{User|Marioguy1}} | |||
I know that the featuring/unfeaturing process can drag on for a while, but by what margin does either side have to lead vote-wise before the article's fate is decided? {{User|Mario4Ever}} | |||
:By a ratio of 1:5 and the proposal drags for 4 months. {{User|LeftyGreenMario}} |
Latest revision as of 11:59, September 14, 2016
Dimentio[edit]
Remove Featured Article Status[edit]
- LeftyGreenMario (talk) Everything seems to be fixed, but the very last section needs images very badly.
- SWFlash (talk) Some of the images are in bad quality.
- Doopliss42 (talk) Per all. I think this article sucks!
- Superfiremario (talk) Per Doopliss42.
- Nicke8 (talk) Per SWFlash.
- Pie4ever0 (talk) Dimentio isn't a big enough character in the Mario Series. Why should he be a Featured Article when he's only been in SPM, while characters like Yoshi, who have made appearances in countless Mario games, are going unfeatured? (Also Per Doopliss42)
- BoygeyDude (talk)I Hate Dimentio. >:( Per all.
Keep Featured Article Status[edit]
- SolarBlaze (talk): As I said earlier, I went ahead and corrected the article's errors, so I'm going to go ahead and place my vote on keeping its Featured Article status.
- New Super Mario (talk): This article has good quality. It's a pretty decent size, has good grammar, and images.
- Yoshidude99 (talk): Per New Super Mario.
- MrConcreteDonkey (talk): Per all.
- Iggykoopa (talk) per all also this article doesn't suck its good and has enough info
- Mario4Ever (talk) I fixed the tense issue yesterday. Overall, the article is well-written, informative, and pleasing to the eye. It's definitely one of the best this wiki has to offer.
- SuperYoshiBros (talk) Personally, I think this is a very good article. It has images, and it also is very long, so I think we should keep it as a Featured Articles.
- Catboy41 (talk) As much as I hate Dimentio, the article does indeed meet the requirements. I think it should still be featured.
- Kooperfan21 (talk):This article is descriptive, an appropriate size, and has good pictures, not to mention its one of the most important articles due to Dimentio being a major and sybolic villain. Overall it should stay.
- UltraMario3000 (talk) Per all.
- Mario7727 (talk)
- Mr. 1-UP (talk) This is a very impressively written article with great picture's and great writting, overall it should stay.
- Tails777 (talk) per all
Removal of Support/Oppose Votes[edit]
Comments[edit]
In my opinion, you can always change the tense yourself quite easily (though it is quite a pain). I understand changing the informal parts are a pain, though. Images should be the main concern, though. I don't have the game to do this, though. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)
I'll see what I can do about fixing this article's problems.
SolarBlaze (talk)
The template is still there :/ And did you read my other reasons? LeftyGreenMario (talk)
The present/past-tense errors have been corrected. SolarBlaze (talk)
- Really? I still see some past tense verbs. LeftyGreenMario (talk)
BLOF, By "good quality" I mean that I beleive that it seems lenghty enough and seems interesting to read. New Super Mario (talk)
- But is the quality of the writing good? I am forced to support unfeaturing this if the article is filled with bad grammar. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)
@BLOF: I'll go and look for grammar mistakes I missed and fix them. New Super Mario (talk)
I hardly found anything with grammar. And I gave some reason to my vote. New Super Mario (talk)
- @SKMarioMan: Could you pinpoint an area where information is sparse for us? That way, we know what to fix. Marioguy1 (talk)
I know that the featuring/unfeaturing process can drag on for a while, but by what margin does either side have to lead vote-wise before the article's fate is decided? Mario4Ever (talk)
- By a ratio of 1:5 and the proposal drags for 4 months. LeftyGreenMario (talk)