MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Honeyhive Galaxy: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Porplemontage moved page MarioWiki:Featured Articles/Unfeature/N1/Honeyhive Galaxy to MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Honeyhive Galaxy: Fix) |
|||
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]=== | ===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]=== | ||
{{ | {{UNFANOMFAIL | ||
|nominated=00:53 3 December 2010 (UTC) | |nominated=00:53 3 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
| | |lastedit=20 December 2010 | ||
|nosupport=True | |||
}} | }} | ||
==== Remove Featured Article Status ==== | ==== Remove Featured Article Status ==== | ||
Line 19: | Line 20: | ||
Fawfulfury, you're supposed to add a reason for unfeature nominations. If this is a feature nomination, yeah, it's allowed. {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} | Fawfulfury, you're supposed to add a reason for unfeature nominations. If this is a feature nomination, yeah, it's allowed. {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} | ||
Wait, how come this article does not show up on [[MarioWiki:Featured | Wait, how come this article does not show up on [[MarioWiki:Featured articles|this]] page under "FAs Proposed for Unfeaturing"? {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} | ||
65: There is no tense template. Instead, we have a blue one. {{User|LeftyGreenMario}} | 65: There is no tense template. Instead, we have a blue one. {{User|LeftyGreenMario}} |
Latest revision as of 10:59, September 14, 2016
Honeyhive Galaxy[edit]
Remove Featured Article Status[edit]
Keep Featured Article Status[edit]
- Bowser's luma (talk) Since Tucayo fixed the tense and such, it's now fine. Merci boucoup Tucayo (and I leave you speaking French to a Mexican...)
- Tucayo (talk) - Oh yes, I need to vote here XP per BL. Sil vous plait. Wait...
- BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) Oh yes. Merci. PS I can't speak French, and Tucayo, um, don't create passive sentences.
- Gamefreak75 (talk) - Sono molto bellissimo ancora.
- MrConcreteDonkey (talk) Per tout. :)
Removal of Support/Oppose Votes[edit]
Comments[edit]
Fawfulfury, you're supposed to add a reason for unfeature nominations. If this is a feature nomination, yeah, it's allowed. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)
Wait, how come this article does not show up on this page under "FAs Proposed for Unfeaturing"? BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)
65: There is no tense template. Instead, we have a blue one. LeftyGreenMario (talk)
I'll fix the demonstratives thing. Tucayo (talk)
It seems as if the verb tense template was changed to a different rewrite template, but still, that's against the rules. Bowser's luma (talk)
All problems have been solved. It was written terribly Tucayo (talk)