MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Baby Peach: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
 
(25 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]===
===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]===
{{UNFANOMSTAT}}
{{UNFANOMFAIL
|nominated=<!--Sign with FIVE tildes(~) here to put the exact date of the nomination. -->00:41, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
|nominated=04:51, 15 July 2010
|passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last opposet  by copying it from the history of the page.-->
|lastedit=00:41, July 13 2010
}}
}}
==== Remove Featured Article Status ====
==== Remove Featured Article Status ====
# The "Mario and Luigi" game was released before Yoshi's Island DS, but the Yoshi's Island DS section is before the "Mario and Luigi" section.


==== Keep Featured Article Status ====
==== Keep Featured Article Status ====
 
#{{User|MeritC}} I seriously don't see why this needs to be unfeatured. We don't have any more info to put on this page, and how the "History" has been laid out in regards to Baby Peach's "chronology" is in good order. Hence my vote to keep the "featured article" here.
==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ====
#{{User|Birdo beauties}} Per MeritC.
#{{User|Commander Code-8}} Umm... What's wrong with this article?? The start needs some expansion but it's not something that will Unfeature the article.
#{{User|KS3}} Per all.
#{{User|Booderdash}} Very small detail equals very easy feature.


==== Comments ====
==== Comments ====
Wait, hold up a second -- since when was it the standard that the "History" section should be in "game appearance" order. If I'm not mistaken, I'm under the assumption that this is the proposer's complaint. He's saying that regardless of "chronological order", game appearance order overrides that. --M. C. - "Mario Gals" Fan! [[User:MeritC|User Page]] | [[User_talk:MeritC|Talk Page]] 04:58, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
:MeritC: You are completely correct. Which makes the vote invalid, which means that someone has to remove it. That's why I added the removal section. But we need one more vote and the admin vote. {{User|Marioguy1}}

Latest revision as of 11:59, September 14, 2016

Baby Peach

Baby Peach was nominated to be unfeatured at 04:51, 15 July 2010.

Baby Peach failed unfeaturing requirements at 00:41, 12 August 2010, and is currently able to be renominated.

Remove Featured Article Status

Keep Featured Article Status

  1. MeritC (talk) I seriously don't see why this needs to be unfeatured. We don't have any more info to put on this page, and how the "History" has been laid out in regards to Baby Peach's "chronology" is in good order. Hence my vote to keep the "featured article" here.
  2. Birdo beauties (talk) Per MeritC.
  3. Commander Code-8 (talk) Umm... What's wrong with this article?? The start needs some expansion but it's not something that will Unfeature the article.
  4. KS3 (talk) Per all.
  5. Booderdash (talk) Very small detail equals very easy feature.

Comments

Wait, hold up a second -- since when was it the standard that the "History" section should be in "game appearance" order. If I'm not mistaken, I'm under the assumption that this is the proposer's complaint. He's saying that regardless of "chronological order", game appearance order overrides that. --M. C. - "Mario Gals" Fan! User Page | Talk Page 04:58, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

MeritC: You are completely correct. Which makes the vote invalid, which means that someone has to remove it. That's why I added the removal section. But we need one more vote and the admin vote. Marioguy1 (talk)
Retrieved from "https://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=MarioWiki:Featured_articles/Unfeature/N1/Baby_Peach&oldid=2056995"