MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Super Mario Bros.: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(21 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
===[[Super Mario Bros.]]===
{{FANOMFAIL
{{FANOMSTAT
|nominated=3:06, 11 March 2010
|nominated=3:06, 11 March 2010
|passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last oppose by copying it from the history of the page.-->
|lastedit=21:09, 16 April 2010
|nosupport=
}}
}}
===[[Super Mario Bros.]]===
==== Support ====
==== Support ====
#{{User|Byllant}} - I bring back this rejected old nomination again, now the Development section is there. For the rest of the article, everything is well-written (there could be a small typo anywhere, though), a lot of images, article size is good, still needs more references, but eventually we'll find them.
#{{User|Byllant}} - I bring back this rejected old nomination again, now the Development section is there. For the rest of the article, everything is well-written (there could be a small typo anywhere, though), a lot of images, article size is good, still needs more references, but eventually we'll find them.
 
#{{User|The Mario's Master}}
#{{User|The Mario's Master}} I agree with {{User|Byllant}}. This article gave me a lot of info. It should be a featured article. So, it's 3-2.
#{{User|dimentio256}}
#{{User|Flipnote Hatena Fan}}
#{{User|StormyTheGreat}}
#{{User|FusionLuigi10}}
#{{User|Mario Fan 123}}


==== Oppose ====
==== Oppose ====
Line 14: Line 20:
#{{User|Commander Code-8}}The story section looks as though it was written by a child. So No
#{{User|Commander Code-8}}The story section looks as though it was written by a child. So No
#{{User|Reversinator}} The Developement section has been plagiarized from Nintendopedia.
#{{User|Reversinator}} The Developement section has been plagiarized from Nintendopedia.
#{{User|Fawfulfury65}} Per Reversinator.
#{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} The only solution to stop plagiarism is to quote and cite the work or rewrite in your own words. The trivia is long and the sprite in the gallery looks out of place.
#{{User|KS3}} per all.


==== Removal of Opposes ====
==== Removal of Opposes ====
Line 31: Line 40:
**BLOF: Someone drew the boxart; someone drew Mario, in all his fiery glory; someone drew the font on the box; someone drew the "Action Series" logo; someone drew the Nintendo logo. It's art. Sprites are a type of art. That is a nonissue.
**BLOF: Someone drew the boxart; someone drew Mario, in all his fiery glory; someone drew the font on the box; someone drew the "Action Series" logo; someone drew the Nintendo logo. It's art. Sprites are a type of art. That is a nonissue.
**Copying and pasting, then changing a few words '''is still plagarism'''. Someone else wrote it in the first place, and even if you replace (as an example) "kill" with "stomp" it's still someone else's work. You haven't changed the underlying meaning, the sentence structure -- nothing. The only way to add new material is to '''write it yourself'''. {{User|Toadfan}}
**Copying and pasting, then changing a few words '''is still plagarism'''. Someone else wrote it in the first place, and even if you replace (as an example) "kill" with "stomp" it's still someone else's work. You haven't changed the underlying meaning, the sentence structure -- nothing. The only way to add new material is to '''write it yourself'''. {{User|Toadfan}}
:That very last image on the gallery. That's a sprite. It looks misplaced along other artwork. {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}}
Well, I replaced the plagiarized text so you guys should reconsider. Now we need is the SOURCE. {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}}
:The source is Nintendopedia, hello {{User|KS3}}
::Nintendopedia is a fan site, just like the Mario Wiki. Juts because they say something is doesn't mean it's official. {{User|Reversinator}}

Latest revision as of 10:59, September 14, 2016

Super Mario Bros. was nominated for Featured Article status at 3:06, 11 March 2010.

Super Mario Bros. failed FA status requirements at 21:09, 16 May 2010, and can currently be renominated.


Super Mario Bros.

Support

  1. Byllant (talk) - I bring back this rejected old nomination again, now the Development section is there. For the rest of the article, everything is well-written (there could be a small typo anywhere, though), a lot of images, article size is good, still needs more references, but eventually we'll find them.
  2. The Mario's Master (talk)
  3. dimentio256 (talk)
  4. Flipnote Hatena Fan (talk)
  5. StormyTheGreat (talk)
  6. FusionLuigi10 (talk)
  7. Mario Fan 123 (talk)

Oppose

  1. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) If it still needs references, it doesn't get featured until we do. The game logo is clearly not artwork either. It's a sprite. Plus, the trivia section is quite long.
  2. Commander Code-8 (talk)The story section looks as though it was written by a child. So No
  3. Reversinator (talk) The Developement section has been plagiarized from Nintendopedia.
  4. Fawfulfury65 (talk) Per Reversinator.
  5. LeftyGreenMario (talk) The only solution to stop plagiarism is to quote and cite the work or rewrite in your own words. The trivia is long and the sprite in the gallery looks out of place.
  6. KS3 (talk) per all.

Removal of Opposes

Comments

In your summary: "The long-awaited Developement section is here, partially edited from the Nintendopedia"

Tell me you hadn't plagiarized it -_-; BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)

I said partially, obviously I didn't just copy and paste, that would been inapropiate. Byllant (talk)
So in other words, you copy and pasted it, and then changed it? Reversinator (talk)

@BLOF: What do you mean when you say "The game logo is clearly not artwork either. It's a sprite."? --Marcelagus (talk)

  • (I must recuse myself from supporting/opposing again, having edited both the talkpage and the article.)
    • BLOF: Someone drew the boxart; someone drew Mario, in all his fiery glory; someone drew the font on the box; someone drew the "Action Series" logo; someone drew the Nintendo logo. It's art. Sprites are a type of art. That is a nonissue.
    • Copying and pasting, then changing a few words is still plagarism. Someone else wrote it in the first place, and even if you replace (as an example) "kill" with "stomp" it's still someone else's work. You haven't changed the underlying meaning, the sentence structure -- nothing. The only way to add new material is to write it yourself. Toadfan (talk)
That very last image on the gallery. That's a sprite. It looks misplaced along other artwork. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)

Well, I replaced the plagiarized text so you guys should reconsider. Now we need is the SOURCE. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)

The source is Nintendopedia, hello KS3 (talk)
Nintendopedia is a fan site, just like the Mario Wiki. Juts because they say something is doesn't mean it's official. Reversinator (talk)
Retrieved from "https://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=MarioWiki:Featured_articles/N1/Super_Mario_Bros.&oldid=2056739"