User talk:UhHuhAlrightDaisy

UhHuhAlrightDaisy's Archives: Latest - 8 - 7 - 6 - 5 - 4 - 3 - 2 - 1

Leave me a message here.

RE:Daisy's Amount of Appearances

Alright, let's break this down one by one:

1. "arguments about how we don't say something like this for other characters as a defense against the information. But you can't apply this statement to other characters"
   That specific information, sure. But if we keep listing the amount of appearances every character has and then say "aside from this other character", the information will go on forever on every character's page and would make it strenuous, excessive, and even more unnecessary.
2. "Daisy appearing in so many video-games, especially with so many playable appearances, and being a female character, is the kind of thing they put in the Guinness world record books."
   Daisy's pretty common in the spin-off titles, it'd be more noteworthy if she was seen outside of a standard Nintendo game, like Mario, Luigi, and Peach. And is there actually anything in the Guinness books about Daisy? If so, then it might be noteworthy to add. Peach is a noteworthy female character that has appeared in several games because of her role. Daisy's role is supportive, at one point even acting as the game's Peach.
3. "They may have even done so for Peach already if I recall."
   That's Peach. This is Daisy. Comparing the amount of games Daisy is in to Peach's amount of appearances is unnecessary, especially when Daisy has such a meager amount comparatively.

I like Daisy, I really do, but I find adding this information pointless. 14:55, 22 March 2018 (EDT)

Also, don't keep readding the information back, as that would be edit warring. Instead, if you really feel like this information should stay, a discussion should take place on her talk page to see who agrees and disagrees. 14:58, 22 March 2018 (EDT)

1. "Uh, Peach has appeared in 97, actually. That's 17 more than Daisy, so that is no meager amount, comparatively."
   In that case, maybe say the correct number then? "80" is more than "60" after all.
2. "It's odd to me you're now saying, "That's Peach. This is Daisy. Comparing the amount of games Daisy is in to Peach's amount of appearances is unnecessary," when your main argument against this was how we could then say this type of thing for other characters, but we couldn't, anyway."
   What I mean is that a comparison in general isn't necessary. Eighty is certainly impressive, but compared to Peach, it's second place at best.
3. "Daisy is the one female video-game character in the world with the most video-game appearances... aside from Peach."
   My point exactly.
4. "If Luigi had the most aside from Mario, that's significant, too."
   It is not.
5. "Culture regards female videogame characters to an obviously different regard."
   Maybe, but in this day and age, female video game characters are not a new thing. Peach's information is even delegated to her trivia, and it's only there because of her starting appearance, her role, and the absolute fact that she has appeared in more video games than any other female character. Daisy does not have that distinction.
6. "It's significant to Daisy because there are no other female characters aside from the obvious, Peach."
   Pauline, Birdo, Wendy O. Koopa, female Piantas, female Nokis, Rosalina, Hariet. And that's not including the spin-off titles.
7. "It's not focusing on comparing her to Peach, though, so I don't know why you're focusing in on this in regards to other characters."
   "aside from Peach." Seems pretty focused to me.
8. "We clearly don't agree."
   No, it appears we do not. As I said above, post something on her talk page or maybe respond to Baby Luigi's topic that is already there.
9. "other user"
   She has a name, you know. No need to be rude.
10. "Is there actually anything wrong with stating how many games she's been in so far?"
    Not in and of itself. Perhaps there is a different way to word it, but again, why just Daisy? Why don't we put how many games every character has been in on their pages? In theory, it seems like good information to have in an infobox section maybe, but again, it should be discussed.

15:47, 22 March 2018 (EDT)

Sure, I have some minutes to kill before I go to bed.

1. "I don't follow? What are you getting those numbers from?"
   Uh, the 60 is from the statement in question, whereas the 80 is from your numbers mentioned above. 97 games Peach has appeared in minus the difference of 17 games that Daisy is not in equals the total of 80 that Daisy appears in.
2. "No other female characters with that many appearances, obviously. Not even just Mario characters, either. All video game characters."
   Alright, I'll give you that.
3. "That's not me being rude, that's me not recalling that other user's name. No need to micromanage intentions like that."
   Apologies. Baby Luigi and I on Discord both thought that was you being angry at her. I'll apologize for the both of us if that is not the case. Page history is a thing, though.
4. "That part of it is simple information that would be a part of her intro section. It doesn't have to be some approved guideline followed on everyone's page."
   It both does and it doesn't. Luigi has appeared in more games than Daisy, Peach has appeared in more games than Luigi, and Mario has appeared in more games than Peach. If we're going to include this information, then it shouldn't be a situation unique to Daisy as that seems arbitrary.
5. "I'm not here to start a proposal to reformat the wiki. I used to do that all the time and it's always more trouble than it's worth."
   Hey, you never know until you try. I have a few failed and cancelled proposals myself. It's just meant to serve as a way to get opinions, and if it actually goes through, then yay!
6. "hopefully it's fine that I add it back in without the latter part you two have focused in on so intently."
   I'll say this again, it should be a discussion first. Not just with me, but with the community. Talk about the pros and cons of this situation and see what other users have to say on this matter. Doesn't have to be a proposal, just a simple discussion. If you do end up doing this, be sure to link to our discussion here on both our talk pages so other users have a better reference for the topic.

Before I head to bed, I want to specify that there a few major problems with the sentence and the information it holds. Hopefully this clears up any remaining problems:

1. "With the frequent release of Mario installments,"
   This is relevant because why? Mario games are released frequently anyway.
2. "Daisy has been in over 60 video games so far,"
   So has a majority of the main cast of characters in the Mario series. Daisy isn't unique in this regard.
3. "the most of any female character besides Princess Peach."
   Herein lies the major issue: the comparison. She may be the second most reoccurring female video game character (maybe), but the problem here is "second most". I may just be repeating myself, but anything other than the actual record holder is unnecessary. We don't give these numbers on Luigi's page, or Bowser's page, or Amy Rose's page, or Chun-Li's page. All four of those examples have appeared in a plethora of titles, but only Mario's and Peach's records hold any relevancy.

Overall, this information isn't false or invalid, but the way it is worded and presented makes it irrelevant due to the added exception of Princess Peach. A comparison isn't needed, not even it being in sentence form is needed. A simple number in the character infobox could maybe possibly work, though anyone can look at the table of appearances at the bottom of their pages, but I'll leave that to you to decide if you feel like going through with that discussion or not.
Until tomorrow, good night. 01:18, 23 March 2018 (EDT)

Image categories

Hello! When you upload images, please also include an image category relating to the game it is from. For example, your recent Mario Tennis Aces images would be placed in Category:Mario Tennis Aces Images. Thanks! --TheFlameChomp (talk) 10:23, 15 April 2018 (EDT)

Re: Mario Tennis Aces - Daisy Artwork

Found it in the "Technique" section in the the Japanese website: https://www.nintendo.co.jp/switch/alera/technique/index.html
Image You probably didn't see that coming.
You're welcome - Infinite8 15:07, 26 May 2018 (EDT)

Deanna Mustard interview; Email

Hi, also a huge Princess daisy fan but I want to sya thanks for posting this amazing interview of Deanna Mustar. It's not often you've seen an interview from her given that she lives a personal life and seldom accepts interviews. I dunno if your allowed to ask this on the talk page of if it would be better to sent it on my talk page but do you know her email and how did you get it cause I know you said it was through someone on flickr but how?--PrincessDaisyfan85 (talk) 11:34, 2 September 2018 (EDT)

Forum account...?

Hey, was trying to recall if I ever asked you this before, but do you still have an account at the MarioWiki forums, by any chance? There's something that I want to see about asking you that's Princess Daisy related, but can't be discussed on your talk page because of "internal stuff" and such. Let me know as soon as you get this; thanks so much. --M. C. - Profile | Talk Page 12:51, 5 October 2018 (EDT)

Hey, thanks for the heads up; sent that PM your way a few days ago. --M. C. - Profile | Talk Page 03:41, 14 October 2018 (EDT)

Image revisions

I'm confused at your edit warring with the Super Mario Party images. You're reverting to the exact same image, just with a wider blank canvas. There's no need for that space, and your latest revision of the Daisy image makes even less sense as all it did was increase the KB count. 12:56, 8 October 2018 (EDT)

How has Daisy's image been edited? 13:11, 8 October 2018 (EDT)

Ah, it's a subtle difference, but I see it. For future reference, though: Avoid these edit wars. Better to talk it out first than continuing the make the edit or revision. 13:17, 8 October 2018 (EDT)

Categories

Hello, UhHuhAlrightDaisy. Good job on your recent uploads, but when uploading files, keep in mind that you must correctly categorize the file. It's simple to learn how to do so. Just search for the correct category by starting with the following groups: Images Audio/video files Company images Film images Game images Merchandise images Publication images System images Television series images Website images Company media files Film media files Game media files Merchandise media files Publication media files System media files Television series media files Website media files When uploading, copy the full title of the category and insert it in square brackets into the summary text box below the {{aboutfile}} template, replacing the {{uncategorized}} template entirely. If you're using the upload function from the text editor, simply add the category link to the description. For example, files related to the game Super Mario World would use: [[Category:Super Mario World images]] or [[Category:Super Mario World media files]] Please consider the above information before uploading more files. Keep in mind that some files can belong to multiple categories. Do not put images into the media files category, or vice versa. If you continue uploading files without categorizing them correctly, then a warning will be issued. Thank you for reading, and keep contributing.

I added them all for you, but your pep rally and icon images were all missing Category:Super Mario Party Images. 13:09, 10 October 2018 (EDT)

File:DaisyArmsAkimbo2019.png

Regarding your recent upload, {{aboutfile}} and categorisation were not done properly. For the former, the parameters you're not using (in this case "|4=Resized" and "|5=Other versions (use file link)") should be removed, and an image category link is added as [[Category:Mario Kart Tour Images]], not {{Mario Kart Tour Images}}, as the notice one post up explains. The game's title is also not a proper source.

That said, please try to avoid these kinds of shoddy edits to the source image, because aside from the poor transparency it looks like the artwork itself has been touched up a bit. Unless the source was this image from the website, if possible please upload it unmodified (cropping is allowed, but not like that) and with the correct source added in the summary. I understand it's a new render but we shouldn't have this level of quality for an image on such a high-traffic subject. Mario JC 21:12, August 28, 2019 (EDT)

This is the same image you uploaded before but with the white background. Did you get this from somewhere else or edit this yourself? The image from the website is smaller than that, and as I've already mentioned images shouldn't be modified to this degree. Mario JC 20:59, August 29, 2019 (EDT)

Also, for the Final Smash rips, they needed [[Category:Super Smash Bros. Ultimate Images]]. Please remember to categorise future uploads. Mario JC 21:45, August 29, 2019 (EDT)

Given how small the source image is, the result when I resized it was blurrier than that. Mario JC 08:46, August 31, 2019 (EDT)

Assistance

Hi. You probably don't know me. I'm an editor that finds lots of obscure content. I need help with something. Reply to me on my talk page and I'll tell you what it is. Lord Falafel (talk) 15:38, August 29, 2019 (EDT)

File:MGSR - Daisy artwork.png

Can you provide a source for the darker-skinned version of this artwork? Mario JC 22:31, June 4, 2021 (EDT)

[1]

Per my summary on the file page. Please get artwork from official or reliable sources in the future. Websites like Deviantart and Twitter fan accounts are not reliable, as they may have been edited by the uploader even if they didn't claim so. Mario JC 22:07, June 5, 2021 (EDT)