Talk:Bell Kritter: Difference between revisions
m (Text replacement - "" to "") |
m (Text replacement - "([Pp]roposal|[Ss]ettled)(Outcome|TPP)" to "$1 $2") |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
==Merge this article with [[Kritter#Donkey Kong 64]]== | ==Merge this article with [[Kritter#Donkey Kong 64]]== | ||
{{ | {{Settled TPP}} | ||
{{ | {{Proposal outcome|passed|5-0|merge}} | ||
As discussed above, this article concerns a minor subject which is subordinated from a greater species. I stand by the policy at [[MarioWiki:Minor NPCs]], which describes that conjectural-named, minor characters should be merged with their relevant species. | As discussed above, this article concerns a minor subject which is subordinated from a greater species. I stand by the policy at [[MarioWiki:Minor NPCs]], which describes that conjectural-named, minor characters should be merged with their relevant species. | ||
Latest revision as of 15:26, May 31, 2024
Is there anything that separates these Kritters from other Kritters? Hello, I'm Time Turner.
They seem to be characters, but extremely minor characters. I agree, this article probably shouldn't stand alone.--Knife (talk) 04:44, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
Merge this article with Kritter#Donkey Kong 64[edit]
|
This talk page proposal has already been settled. Please do not edit any of the sections in the proposal. If you wish to discuss the article, do so in a new header below the proposal. |
merge 5-0
As discussed above, this article concerns a minor subject which is subordinated from a greater species. I stand by the policy at MarioWiki:Minor NPCs, which describes that conjectural-named, minor characters should be merged with their relevant species.
Proposer: YoshiKong (talk)
Deadline: October 17 2012, 23:59 GMT
Support[edit]
- YoshiKong (talk) Per policy.
- Coooool123 (talk) Per Yoshikong. Plus, do we really need yet another tiny article, wasting space? MERGE POWER!!!
- BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) Why does this even have an article in the first place when it can be easily merged into Kritter?
- Kelton2 (talk) Of course. What is with all these small articles that should be merged?
- Yoshi K (talk) Hey guys! If we should keep this article, we should make one for the bell they ring too! So in other words, merge.
Oppose[edit]
Comments?[edit]
@Kelton2: Tell me about it. Plus, everyone seems to want to split all the articles of different sizes (eg Mega/Mini versions of the same thing). It's so pointless.Coooool123 (talk)
- Size really shouldn't matter when it comes to deciding an article's merit. I mean, I've created many different item articles currently-all are small-yet they are still standalone items and stuff. It's only for stuff like this where this article can be merged into another and still make sense
Ray Trace(T|C)
