Talk:Super Smash Bros. Brawl/Archive 4: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
m (Text replacement - "{{[Tt]alkarchive" to "{{talk archive")
 
(186 intermediate revisions by 36 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{partofpipe|image=[[Image:Ssbemblem.png|32px]]|type=article|name=Super Smash Bros.|goal=improve upon the articles about the [[Super Smash Bros. (series)|Super Smash Bros. Series]]}}
{{talk archive|Talk: Super Smash Bros. Brawl}}
{{award-winner
|year=first
|#=19|award=Most Anticipated Upcoming Game|presenter=Wayoshi
}}
{{notforumtalk}}
 
{| class="infobox" style="float:right;border:black double 1px;background-color:#fdfdff;padding: 0.5em; margin: 0.5em 0.5em 1em;width:270px;color:black"
{| class="infobox" style="float:right;border:black double 1px;background-color:#fdfdff;padding: 0.5em; margin: 0.5em 0.5em 1em;width:270px;color:black"
|-
|-
Line 15: Line 9:
*'''[[Talk:Super Smash Bros. Brawl/Archive 2|Archive 2 (21-56)]]'''
*'''[[Talk:Super Smash Bros. Brawl/Archive 2|Archive 2 (21-56)]]'''
*'''[[Talk:Super Smash Bros. Brawl/Archive 3|Archive 3 (57-97)]]'''
*'''[[Talk:Super Smash Bros. Brawl/Archive 3|Archive 3 (57-97)]]'''
|}
|}


Line 42: Line 37:
::Ok :P Delete it if you can...--[[User:Caith Sith|Caith Sith]] 09:27, 27 January 2008 (EST)
::Ok :P Delete it if you can...--[[User:Caith Sith|Caith Sith]] 09:27, 27 January 2008 (EST)
:::Why? We'd better be prepared if others come and claim it is real. - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 09:30, 27 January 2008 (EST)
:::Why? We'd better be prepared if others come and claim it is real. - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 09:30, 27 January 2008 (EST)
And look at Luigi! That is one of his Mario Party Artworks. [[User:Torngentleman2|Torngentleman2]]
At last, we have the real pic.--[[User:Caith Sith|Caith Sith]] 11:44, 30 January 2008 (EST)
<br clear=all>
At last, we have the real pic.
[[image:Brawl_Characters.JPG|thumb|300px]]--[[User:Caith Sith|Caith Sith]] 11:45, 30 January 2008 (EST)
<br clear=all>


== Release Preparations ==
== Release Preparations ==
Line 62: Line 65:
:Yes, we better look out for fake pictures. Also, I support the full protection. It's just going to get spammy and fake-y. <span style="font-family:verdana; color:#red;"><font size="5">'''[[User:Paper Jorge|P]]'''aper '''Jorge'''</font></span><small> ( [[User talk:Paper Jorge|Talk]]<tt>&middot;</tt>[[Special:Contributions/Paper Jorge|Contributions]])<tt>&middot;</tt></small>
:Yes, we better look out for fake pictures. Also, I support the full protection. It's just going to get spammy and fake-y. <span style="font-family:verdana; color:#red;"><font size="5">'''[[User:Paper Jorge|P]]'''aper '''Jorge'''</font></span><small> ( [[User talk:Paper Jorge|Talk]]<tt>&middot;</tt>[[Special:Contributions/Paper Jorge|Contributions]])<tt>&middot;</tt></small>


Maybe full protection could be a good idea, but we should definitely unprotect one day before JPN release. About the fake image and rising speculation, it would be best to describe it here. On a side note, when removing [[Template:Newsubject]], please update the article as well, removing terms like "will be" and "upcoming" in the articles with the template.{{User:Knife/sig}} 15:46, 27 January 2008 (EST)
Maybe full protection could be a good idea, but we should definitely unprotect one day before JPN release. About the fake image and rising speculation, it would be best to describe it here. On a side note, when removing [[Template:new subject]], please update the article as well, removing terms like "will be" and "upcoming" in the articles with the template.{{User:Knife/sig}} 15:46, 27 January 2008 (EST)
:Template:Newsubject has a note attached to it which is underlined and says that the template ''<u>stays</u>'' until the article has been updated. So within the first days, we shouldn't remove anything.
:Template:new subject has a note attached to it which is underlined and says that the template ''<u>stays</u>'' until the article has been updated. So within the first days, we shouldn't remove anything.
:Also, I said it should be protected at exactly the time of the release, where they will be the most spam and unconfirmed info. Before or after the protection wouldn't make much sense. - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 15:49, 27 January 2008 (EST)
:Also, I said it should be protected at exactly the time of the release, where they will be the most spam and unconfirmed info. Before or after the protection wouldn't make much sense. - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 15:49, 27 January 2008 (EST)
::I believe, ET USA, from noon on 1/30 to noon 1/31 is good for a full protection time. In Japan that's like at 5-6am 1/31 to 2/1. {{User:Wayoshi/sig}} 16:28, 27 January 2008 (EST)
::I believe, ET USA, from noon on 1/30 to noon 1/31 is good for a full protection time. In Japan that's like at 5-6am 1/31 to 2/1. {{User:Wayoshi/sig}} 16:28, 27 January 2008 (EST)
Line 69: Line 72:
:::On second thought, it doesn't seem like a good idea. We've never had to take these many precautions for any pre-game releases and I think we are overestimating the potential vandalism for this page. Semi-protection is enough to keep those new spammers out, at least for a while. But it is definitely not worth removing other regular users right to expand this page in fear of vandals. And if it does get heavily vandalized, we can always sort things out later. I know there will be vandalism that day, but not as much vandalism as you guys are thinking about.{{User:Knife/sig}} 19:45, 27 January 2008 (EST)
:::On second thought, it doesn't seem like a good idea. We've never had to take these many precautions for any pre-game releases and I think we are overestimating the potential vandalism for this page. Semi-protection is enough to keep those new spammers out, at least for a while. But it is definitely not worth removing other regular users right to expand this page in fear of vandals. And if it does get heavily vandalized, we can always sort things out later. I know there will be vandalism that day, but not as much vandalism as you guys are thinking about.{{User:Knife/sig}} 19:45, 27 January 2008 (EST)
::That's possibly true. I wouldn't be able to do it after Wayoshi's plan anyway, it would be around midnight for me. - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 09:50, 28 January 2008 (EST)
::That's possibly true. I wouldn't be able to do it after Wayoshi's plan anyway, it would be around midnight for me. - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 09:50, 28 January 2008 (EST)
There seem to be more items pictured in that picture than we have listed.  Does anyone know what they are?


== Wind Waker character design ==
== Wind Waker character design ==


{{LLquote|Right. The development for Smash Bros. Melee began soon after the GameCube was released and we had to design each character from scratch. This time, however, we were able to borrow characters from various development teams, which was a big help. Take The Wind Waker and Twilight Princess from the Zelda series for example. We were able to design the Smash Bros. characters by adapting them just as they were modeled for the original titles.|[[Masahiro Sakurai]]|[http://us.wii.com/iwata_asks/ssbb/vol5_page3.jsp Wii.com - Iwata Asks: Super Smash Bros. Brawl, vol. 5, page 3]}}
{{quote|Right. The development for Smash Bros. Melee began soon after the GameCube was released and we had to design each character from scratch. This time, however, we were able to borrow characters from various development teams, which was a big help. Take The Wind Waker and Twilight Princess from the Zelda series for example. We were able to design the Smash Bros. characters by adapting them just as they were modeled for the original titles.|[[Masahiro Sakurai]]|[http://us.wii.com/iwata_asks/ssbb/vol5_page3.jsp Wii.com - Iwata Asks: Super Smash Bros. Brawl, vol. 5, page 3]}}


It's pretty obvious in here that they have designed a Wind Waker character - just leaves the question whether playable or assist trophy, unlikely cut-out when he mentions it now. - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 11:57, 28 January 2008 (EST)
It's pretty obvious in here that they have designed a Wind Waker character - just leaves the question whether playable or assist trophy, unlikely cut-out when he mentions it now. - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 11:57, 28 January 2008 (EST)
Line 193: Line 199:
[[Image:0181465001201628972.jpg]]
[[Image:0181465001201628972.jpg]]
{{unsigned|Xluidi}}
{{unsigned|Xluidi}}
:AWESOME! <span style="font-family:verdana; color:#red;"><font size="5">'''[[User:Paper Jorge|P]]'''aper '''Jorge'''</font></span><small> ( [[User talk:Paper Jorge|Talk]]<tt>&middot;</tt>[[Special:Contributions/Paper Jorge|Contributions]])<tt>&middot;</tt></small>


==Bomberman?==
==Bomberman?==
Line 210: Line 218:
==Conjectural Info==
==Conjectural Info==
Lately, multiple Users have been adding conjectural info into articles for "Supposedly" in-game characters. Some good examples are Ridley, and Lucario, which was deleted. I personally believe all these leaked screenshots to be fake, but we don't know what's real and what isn't. As such, I feel unless these are confirmed, we should add no conjectural info. Also, I've made fake screenshots just like the ones people are posting right now millions of times on some old forums I was on. They were convincing and really easy to make. I've had multiple people, namely the users KingBoo and McDimentio give me "leaked" videos that supposedly show characters to be confirmed. You can believe that they are real (They aren't. >_>), but please don't add any info. KingBoo has not done so, but McDimentio created a Lucario article and everything. Anyway, conjectural info = No go. {{User:ChaosNinji/sig}}
Lately, multiple Users have been adding conjectural info into articles for "Supposedly" in-game characters. Some good examples are Ridley, and Lucario, which was deleted. I personally believe all these leaked screenshots to be fake, but we don't know what's real and what isn't. As such, I feel unless these are confirmed, we should add no conjectural info. Also, I've made fake screenshots just like the ones people are posting right now millions of times on some old forums I was on. They were convincing and really easy to make. I've had multiple people, namely the users KingBoo and McDimentio give me "leaked" videos that supposedly show characters to be confirmed. You can believe that they are real (They aren't. >_>), but please don't add any info. KingBoo has not done so, but McDimentio created a Lucario article and everything. Anyway, conjectural info = No go. {{User:ChaosNinji/sig}}
I know Jigglypuff was confirmed in  a leak, so where is it?{{User:Knife/sig}} 18:06, 29 January 2008 (EST)
== Proof? ==
I beleive that all this news is crap and care to give some source?{{User:Fg/sig}}
Google is your friend. {{User:Dodoman/sig}}
=="Proof"==
So far, the ONLY characters confirmed by Nintendo not seen at the Dojo are [http://www.joystiq.com/2008/01/21/nintendo-accidentally-confirms-lucario-ness-jigglypuff-for-bra/ Jigglypuff, Ness, and Lucario. They were accidentally leaked in a Wii demo video at the Japanese Dojo site.] Also, Ness is seen in the opening of the official Brawl game released in Japan. For now, let's treat all material not done BY NINTENDO as crap. {{User:3dejong/sig|NO MATTER HOW OFFICIAL IT LOOKS!}}
:Marth appears in the opening too, and Luigi appeared on a youtube video, were King Dedede transforms him into a trophy.[[User:Javier12345|Javier12345]] 20:34, 29 January 2008 (EST)
== Green Hill Zone Stage CONFIRMED ==
http://www.wii-brasil.com/arquivo/0332513001201630138.jpg
Here it is {{User:SonicMario/sig}}
:Isn't there also a YouTube video with this stage in it?  I can't remember. {{User:Stumpers/sig}} 19:54, 29 January 2008 (EST)
== Wolf... Star Wolf ==
[[http://img120.imageshack.us/img120/4951/wolfandfinalsmashby4.png]] [[User:Fixitup|Fixitup]]
:This isnt fake. Wolf is in Brawl ^_^.
:Hopefully. I still think there's gonna be more than 35 people tohugh. Seriously, unlocking everyone through the story modes only?[[User:Fixitup|Fixitup]]
I think that's fake, he has the same FS, WTF? Let's just wait untill tomarrrow, untill then everyone just stop [[User:HyperToad|HyperToad]] 07:35, 30 January 2008 (EST)
:Well it could be Fox's alternative costume, which I haven't seen. And stop? Stop what? Stop adding real information? ...NO. <span style="font-family:verdana; color:#red;"><font size="5">'''[[User:Paper Jorge|P]]'''aper '''Jorge'''</font></span><small> ( [[User talk:Paper Jorge|Talk]]<tt>&middot;</tt>[[Special:Contributions/Paper Jorge|Contributions]])<tt>&middot;</tt></small>
#No Jorge, I meant STOP ADDING LINKS! It's too confusing.
#It has it's own name, so if this is real, it's a new character, alter. costumes don't get special names, not een Peach's daisy costume.
#I'm sure that there are going to be more character then we think, maybe even going up to 50.
#{{User:HyperToad/sig}}
:PJ, Pokemon DP made us wait to make an article for Peach Blossom until it was announced on the site a day later.  I think it has something to do with the conjecture stuff.  I personally don't mind... especially when it's going to be "announced" in 24 hours, but HyperToad has a point. :( I don't like fights. {{User:Stumpers/sig}} 16:24, 30 January 2008 (EST)
== Who is this guy? ==
He is on here (http://es.youtube.com/watch?v=vtWxwsR3oB4 please see here) Who is that guy when it shows a image of a spaceship thing in the desert,then it shows a big robot guy with purple skin and a spike on his head?(note:the images that I'm talking about are the 9th and 10th images the guy shows)(note2:it shows this guys images after it shows the image that said Falcon Punch Comfirmed) [[User:Luigi-Tron 3000|Luigi-Tron 3000]]
:The link you've posted is broken, there's no YouTube video with that address. - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 10:43, 30 January 2008 (EST)
:I just fixed it [[User:Luigi-Tron 3000]]
::I didn't find any unknown character in there. Check this page, there's some info about Subspace Emissary bosses. - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 10:53, 30 January 2008 (EST)
:Note that I'm not talking about Porky [[User:Luigi-Tron3000]]
== True rooster? ==
(http://images.wikia.com/ssb/images/3/31/Brawl_roster.jpg) [[Luigi-Tron 3000]]
Maybe... [[User:HyperToad|HyperToad]]
:Yes, it is. Is uploaded and in the Brawl article.--[[User:Caith Sith|Caith Sith]] 12:00, 30 January 2008 (EST)
::Don't add it unless you have proof! Where'd it come from? [[User:HyperToad|HyperToad]]
yes, it is, wwe dont have a REAL proof, but yeah, this is the offical rooster {{User:McDimentio/sig}}
That's contridary, if you have no proof, then how do you know it's offical. [[User:HyperToad|HyperToad]] Not that I don't believe it, but we need prove, or it might get removed.
:This rooster was seen in various youtube videos. So yes, its official...--[[User:Caith Sith|Caith Sith]] 12:47, 30 January 2008 (EST)
It doesn't matter if it is real, obviously all the secret characters wouldn't be unlocked using only sse and c modes. There's room for another row. [[User:Fixitup|Fixitup]]
:LOL! Rooster? It's called Roster. :P <span style="font-family:verdana; color:#red;"><font size="5">'''[[User:Paper Jorge|P]]'''aper '''Jorge'''</font></span><small> ( [[User talk:Paper Jorge|Talk]]<tt>&middot;</tt>[[Special:Contributions/Paper Jorge|Contributions]])<tt>&middot;</tt></small>
::One thing I noticed about this is that the series tend to line up vertically (Mario, Luigi, Peach, Bowser on the left... the sub-Mario's on the next column, etc.  Anyway, that alone makes it seem real, because most fakes have just slammed things together.  But I'm kind of late to the party saying this. {{User:Stumpers/sig}} 13:59, 2 February 2008 (EST)
== Lucario stage and Jiggly's final smash ==
http://pokemon-safari.com/sitio/noticias//data/upimages/col_lanza.jpg
P.D: I don't know why Jiggly is a a giant...--[[User:Caith Sith|Caith Sith]] 14:27, 30 January 2008 (EST)
:It's supposed to be Jigglypuff's Final Smash...though I don't see that image. - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 15:29, 30 January 2008 (EST)
This, I can say looks fake. [[User:Fixitup|Fixitup]]
:Isn't Jiggly FS, i think it's a Event {{User:McDimentio/sig}}
== Luigi's Mansion ==
http://youtube.com/watch?v=vdMVPS_CQL8
The Luigi's Mansion stage in Brawl. Luigi pwned. ~ [[User:TheGreenFire|TheGreenFire]]
== Who is this guy? Part 2 ==
A space ship mode of him
http://ranobe.com/up/src/up253909.jpg
A front view of him in Robot mode
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2252/2227949227_3cf377bcb8_o.jpg
MetaKnight fighting him
http://ranobe.com/up/src/up253911.jpg
So who is this guy?
[[Luigi-Tron 3000]]
:An unnamed boss. <span style="font-family:verdana; color:#red;"><font size="5">'''[[User:Paper Jorge|P]]'''aper '''Jorge'''</font></span><small> ( [[User talk:Paper Jorge|Talk]]<tt>&middot;</tt>[[Special:Contributions/Paper Jorge|Contributions]])<tt>&middot;</tt></small>
::The Japanese name reads "Gareomu". - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 10:24, 31 January 2008 (EST)
==Bowser and Gonnondorf teaming up?==
http://www.wii-brasil.com/arquivo/0187929001201622089.jpg<br>
An unlikely duo. {{User:Mcoolister/sig}}
:THe image doesn't display. Also, the duo isn't unlikely, they're both antagonists. - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 12:45, 31 January 2008 (EST)
== Chraracters ==
Shouldn't we wait before adding every single character? Myabe there playable, maybe not.
{{User:Master Crash/sig}}
:They were all confirmed by the various images of the character selection screen, which isn't fake as above - there were various sources with the same screen, and videos of selection of the characters as well as gameplay of them. For example, there is [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GVfEaTwgn_s this video] where all playable characters appear in a single event match. - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 15:50, 31 January 2008 (EST)
== Character selection screen image ==
[[Image:Brawl_Brawl.jpg|right|thumb]]
I was adding [[:Image:Brawl_Brawl.jpg]] to the [[Super Smash Bros. Brawl#Group|Group section]] of this page, but Fixitup says "we don't need it". A pretty useless statement, per se we don't need any images in the whole article. I just thought that it is an easy explanation of the selection choices for the Pokémon Trainer and Sheik, so that we don't need to state it at an unclear point in the article's text. I don't think it's useless, it's fine there. Don't worry about too many images, the text will get more now. - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 15:43, 31 January 2008 (EST)
:My vote is for Cobold: it was a good image to show that the game is more in depth about switching characters than the last one, and I fail to see how the image had a "rediculously long" explaination. {{User:Stumpers/sig}} 16:11, 31 January 2008 (EST)
::I agree that there were grammatical problems in the description, but that's something that can easily be fixed. - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 16:22, 31 January 2008 (EST)
:::Wow, I think it's pretty obvious you could've come to me about this before crying wolf. The image IS useless, and so is it's description. The article has areas for text for a reason. Images are not so you can explain something that takes up a ridiculous looking amount of room in the thumbnail. If we were to have an image to describe every bit of news like this, the article wouldn't have text anywhere except in images. Wow, wouldn't that be great?... [[User:Fixitup|Fixitup]]
::::Fixitup, you're forgetting that we don't have every image from the Dojo. {{User:Stumpers/sig}} 15:57, 1 February 2008 (EST)
:::Useless? Why useless? It is currently the only image I see with a thumbnail description that deserves the name "description". Most images are images of characters, stages and items which aren't thumbnailed anyway. Why should it be useless. What would be your suggestion of where to put the content in the text instead? - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 16:37, 1 February 2008 (EST)
::::WOW! If you were confused as to where you should place such information, you could've simply asked. Here, I'll do just that for you! :B [[User:Fixitup|Fixitup]]
:::<s>I think you misunderstood. I was actually saying that I don't think there ''is'' any good place except for an image description - it's not too long either, not on my resolution.</s> Looks fine now. - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 17:14, 1 February 2008 (EST)
== New Stage ==
[http://www.smashbros.com/en_us/music/music22_list.html Here, Sakurai mentions a Port Town Aero Dive stage from F-Zero]. But is there actually any information on this stage? With the recent leaks in the game and stuff, there should be at least some information on this stage... <span style="font-family:verdana; color:#red;"><font size="5">'''[[User:Paper Jorge|P]]'''aper '''Jorge'''</font></span><small> ( [[User talk:Paper Jorge|Talk]]<tt>&middot;</tt>[[Special:Contributions/Paper Jorge|Contributions]])<tt>&middot;</tt></small>
:I saw gameplay on a stage where the player unlocked Captain Falcon, but I don't know its name, and I've not player F Zero GX enough to identify it. - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 08:12, 1 February 2008 (EST)
== Secret Fighters ==
We need a seperate subsection in the characters section for secret characters. That way, spoiler-haters won't accidentally read about secret characters. {{User:Dodoman/sig}}
:Yeah, I was already suggestion changing it from Veterans - Newcomers to Default Characters - Unlockables. Though I would suggest a completely new layout for the character section, like the one of [[Super Smash Bros. Melee]], it's much better. - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 16:43, 1 February 2008 (EST)
::Okay, so I started the layout from the ''Melee'' article, but... I kinda destroyed the whole thing in the process. {{User:Dodoman/sig}}
:::It's all [http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=Super_Smash_Bros._Brawl&oldid=319951 in the history] for reference. - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 18:33, 1 February 2008 (EST)
::::Cobold: If you could do that, that would be great.  It's very hard to read as it currently is. {{User:Stumpers/sig}} 18:53, 1 February 2008 (EST)
Mwahaha- Feel my wrath, it is complete. Feel free to improve. I just gotta go feed myself before I die. [[User:Fixitup|Fixitup]]
UPDATE- Whoa-whoa-whoa-whoa! All of the sudden, bars/lines for the chart are dissapearing! What's happenin'??[[User:Fixitup|Fixitup]]
:Good job, Fixitup! I see little room for improvement, except for any video footage of the non-DOJO!!-announced characters using special moves. {{User:Dodoman/sig}}
::Dag, yo, Fixitup... you're always reliable!  Thanks a bundle! {{User:Stumpers/sig}} 20:52, 1 February 2008 (EST)
== All Characters revealed!!!??? ==
That doesn't seem like that is every single character. It just doesn't seem like what Sakauri would want as the FINAL list. Or am I overreacting? Is the final roster really revealed or not? [[Image:Shineget!.png|18px]] [[User:Parayoshi|<span style="color: green">Para Yoshi</span>]] [[Image:Parayoshiicon.jpg|20px]] <sup>[[User talk:Parayoshi|<tt>Wahoo!</tt>]]</sup> [[Image:Mommy!.png|30px]] 18:08, 1 February 2008 (EST)
:From what we've heard, the All-Star mode was unlocked by unlocking all characters seen in the roster. I also saw an event match which featured all playable characters. - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 18:24, 1 February 2008 (EST)
::I don't think those are all the caharcters, like why would there be an animal crossing symbol if there is no  playable Animal Crossing character, and what about Krystal, someone will voice her, has she been confirmed as assist trophy or what? [[User:Javier12345|Javier12345]] 20:42, 1 February 2008 (EST)
:::Krystal and other members of the Star Fox Team appears in various conditions and talk with Fox. Like Snake's Codec with Mei Ling, Otacon and Campbell. This is Fox special taunt... --[[User:Caith Sith|Caith Sith]] 20:52, 1 February 2008 (EST)
I saw a youtube about Ashely in the brawl. And [http://youtube.com/watch?v=TYGLm0n64BA&feature=related Waach this video] to see if it's true. [[user:GiGi25|GiGi25]]
:ofc is fake -_-{{User:McDimentio/sig}}
::What do you mean, "ofc"? - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 17:04, 2 February 2008 (EST)
:::I hear Ashely's a background character in the WarioWare stage. --[[User:Trogga|Trogga]] 21:26, 3 February 2008 (EST)
== Sonic and Snake? ==
On the page it says that Sonic and Snake are default characters, well in this pic, it differs [http://www.smashbros.com/en_us/gamemode/various/various25.html]
{{User:Dry Bones/sig| Very strange.......}}
:We're going off of the character page on the Dojo website: the character page now differentiates between veterans, newcomers, and secret characters.  Go check it out. {{User:Stumpers/sig}} 21:16, 1 February 2008 (EST)
ofc snake and sonic are secrets, sakurai just showed them to do merchandising {{User:McDimentio/sig}}
::All sources we've seen on the internet showed us them as unlockables. When looking at the Dojo page carefully, there is now a header "secret characters", but the other section is not labeled "default characters" in return. - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 12:38, 2 February 2008 (EST)
They cant be starters if a pic on brawl doesnt show them in the character scene[[User:Alphaclaw11|Alphaclaw11]] 12:54, 2 February 2008 (EST)
:Well, whatever you guys want.  I don't care at all, but was just answering Dry Bones' question. {{User:Stumpers/sig}} 13:55, 2 February 2008 (EST)
==Spoilers tag==
Should we add a Spoiler tag to warn non user? [[User:Princess Grapes Butterfly|Princess Grapes Butterfly]]
i think that so {{User:McDimentio/sig}}
:The question is, though, how can we keep them from seeing those pictures?  Is there a way we can condense 'em and let users click if they want to see? {{User:Stumpers/sig}} 18:25, 2 February 2008 (EST)
==Delay!==
In the Trivia section it states that Geno was  planned to be in the game.(Which some user caim that it caused the delay.) I think this is fales. Any soures that prove this?. Also on X-play they stated that the game was delay do to Wi-Fi. [[User:Princess Grapes Butterfly|Princess Grapes Butterfly]] 19:17, 2 February 2008 (EST)
:Yeah, that sounds really suspicious, especially considering that you have a reliable source there that says something different. {{User:Stumpers/sig}} 11:42, 3 February 2008 (EST)
and some people say it's because of Leon of RE series {{User:McDimentio/sig}}
I heard that this was on some ''SMRPG'' fansite. Not exactly trustworthy. {{User:Dodoman/sig}}
== We got the whole SSE. ==
http://brawlcentral.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=57&t=4747
The entire collection of Subspace Emissary clips is now available on YouTube. {{User:Dodoman/sig}} Big help to the article, right?
Thank you for the marvelous answer. {{User:Dodoman/sig}}
== Character tables ==
Why were character tables changed? We don't need a Series section (that's what series icons are for), and now hard it's to tell the Pokémon Trainer's B moves apart. --[[User:Trogga|Trogga]] 21:23, 3 February 2008 (EST)
:The series section could really go if we have the icons, but about Pokémon Trainer, we better split him up into Squirtle/Ivysaur/Charizard. - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 05:27, 4 February 2008 (EST)
The icons look weird on their own is the thing.[[User:Fixitup|Fixitup]]
:(I changed "on" to "own"... I think that's what you meant, Fixitup.) Cobold, what are we going to do about the artwork, though? {{User:Stumpers/sig}} 22:19, 4 February 2008 (EST)
::Maybe...we design a different layout for the tables. But I guess we agree that the previous was rather unhandy to and especially edit. - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 04:57, 5 February 2008 (EST)
== All the Costumes for All Characters ==
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RIHJHkzSdxs&eurl=http://brawlcentral.com/
These are some cool costumes! =) [[Luigi-Tron 3000]]
== ALL THE CHARACTERS' FINAL SMASHS! ==
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2HU_AJbx10Q&eurl=http://brawlcentral.com/news.php
Now we know all the final smashs =)  [[Luigi-Tron 3000]]
:A simple note could have done it. - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 05:42, 7 February 2008 (EST)
== New Boss ==
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j7oLrs9iLt8
http://it.youtube.com/watch?v=7jrUVkuD0lw
Boss Battle starts at 5:05 of video 1 and at the start of video 2.It looks like you have to fight him 2 times.We could add him to the boss list.
[[Luigi-Tron 3000]]
== Series ==
Can we remove that series section on the Characters table, and move the Emblem to the name section? The Emblem is enough. {{User:Pokemon DP/sig}} And it takes too much space on the Unlockable table.
:Yes, we already agreed on that above, but yet nobody had time to edit the table. - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 05:16, 8 February 2008 (EST)
::OK, I can do it right now. {{User:Pokemon DP/sig}}
== All SSE levels! ==
http://www.youtube.com/user/fairuzons
This user uploaded all 32 levels of the SSE{{unsigned|Freekhenstra}}
==Music==
Care to explain why we need to clutter up the article with MUSIC! Music of all things! [[User:HyperToad|HyperToad]]
:"Clutter up"? We're so far only listing the tracks. - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 08:58, 8 February 2008 (EST)
::Well still, I think it's not noteworthy to the article. It makes the article bigger then it has to be. [[User:HyperToad|HyperToad]] You said yourself, a wiki isn't just supposed to give all infomation avalible, but noteworthy infomation.
:::We could move it to a separate article which is in [[:Category:Music]], it's generally done with soundtracks. The list of componists could stay in this article or be moved, I'm not sure. - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 09:22, 8 February 2008 (EST)
::::Now that I think of it, the staff section usually also gets split into an article. But currently we don't have Brawl's full credits, so I'm unsure where to put the composers' section. It can stay in the article until we find a solution. - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 09:31, 8 February 2008 (EST)
:::Hold up here, what's all this about "noteworthy" information?  That's really vague.  But, seeing as the music is something that Sakurai has always stressed on his site and in his interview with Iwata (and others, too, I remember), it's definately important info.  Not that it has to be in this article, of course. {{User:Stumpers/sig}} 18:21, 10 February 2008 (EST)
== Split up Pokémon Trainer? ==
As Cobold told, I also think that the Pokémon Trainer's three Pokémon should get their own entries in the table. They are individual characters with individual stats and attacks and completely different appearances. Zero Suit Samus and Sheik also have their own entries, though "only" being alternate forms. --[[User:Grandy02|Grandy02]] 09:52, 8 February 2008 (EST)
:If the current table design stays (if you don't like it, we're always open to new solutions), then he definitely should be split up. Though the Pokémon Trainer himself should probably still be on the list. - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 09:54, 8 February 2008 (EST)
::Yes, of course, the entry for the Pokémon Trainer still must stay. I didn't want to remove it, just three new entries for his Pokémon. And by the way, Squirtle and Ivysaur should get better main images. Only Charizard's image is focused on the Pokémon itself, the images of the two other ones show them together with other characters. --[[User:Grandy02|Grandy02]] 09:58, 8 February 2008 (EST)
ZSS and Sheik have their own profiles on the OFFICAL SITE, the PT's pokemon do not. [[User:HyperToad|HyperToad]]
:The official site isn't the only possible way of organizing Brawl content. We don't want to have a copy of it on this page. This is the '''Mario Wiki''' article on Brawl, not the Dojo. - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 11:40, 8 February 2008 (EST)
::Are you inmplying we know better then the people who made the game? [[User:HyperToad|HyperToad]]
:::No. We don't "know better" when splitting the Pokémon Trainer up into three entries on our list. We just take a different approach on ordering. - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 11:44, 8 February 2008 (EST)
::::I'm just saying if the site identifies them as one character, then that's clearly the way it's supposed to work. How about we spli up the Ice Climbers while we're at it? [[User:HyperToad|HyperToad]]
:::::>.> Splitting up Pokémon Trainer is mainly done for practical reasons. Squirtle, Ivysaur and Charizard have a moveset on their own. Zelda and Sheik have, too, as do Samus and Zero Suit Samus. Ice Climbers do not, the second Ice Climber isn't even playable. This is the way the characters fit best in to the table, that's all. - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 11:52, 8 February 2008 (EST)
::::::Eehheheheheh, actually, the second Ice Climber is playable (Costume Change), but I agree with you, the Pokemons are distinct enough to have their own articles. --[[User:Blitzwing|Blitzwing]] 11:56, 8 February 2008 (EST)
:::::We're currently not talking about articles, but about spaces in the Characters table. - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 12:02, 8 February 2008 (EST)
:::::: D'oh, I am such a doofus. Well, if they have different statistics and moveset, I say they are atleast deserving of their own places on the table. --[[User:Blitzwing|Blitzwing]] 12:06, 8 February 2008 (EST)
== More ways to unlock the hidden characters? ==
http://boards.gamefaqs.com/gfaqs/genmessage.php?board=928518&topic=41190421
Are this ways true? [[Luigi-Tron 3000]]
:Ness's and Marth's alternate ways of unlocking have already stated like that on the Dojo. - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 11:39, 8 February 2008 (EST)
== New boss again ==
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iCKZnVy8AMw
Game and Watch Robot guy boss!
[[Luigi-Tron 3000]]
== All Star boss mode ==
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l_s5fwuH-Ik
Like all star mode,but with bosses.And also,Crazy Hand is in!
[[Luigi-Tron 3000]]
== location from the Melee in the Brawl!!!! ==
watch this [http://youtube.com/watch?v=G1Me_o1Fq_0 video].0_o {{user:Gissy/sig}}
:Yes, that's [[Yoshi's Island (location)|Yoshi's Island]] from ''[[Super Smash Bros. Melee]]'', which was confirmed on the [http://www.smashbros.com/en_us/stages/stage21.html Melee Stages: Part 2] update. In other words, we already know that stage is returning, but, thanks anyway. {{User:Pokemon DP/sig}}
Oh. {{user:Gissy/sig}}
:lol, I love the ending, Gissy.  I guess those blocks will defy all logic in this title, too. {{User:Stumpers/sig}} 18:25, 10 February 2008 (EST)
== European Release date confirmed ==
It will be released in Europe on June 6, 2008.
Links (both dutch sites):
http://www.nonly.nl/nieuws/4655/Releasedatum_Super_Smash_Bros._Brawl_bekend/
http://www.gamersnet.nl/nieuws/200802/super_smash_bros_brawl_verschijnt_6_juni_in_europa/
Now all we need is the Australian release date. {{User: King Boo/sig}}
:Also confirmed by [http://www.wiiz.fr/article.php?a=16500 this French site]. News didn't seem to reach the English-speaking world yet. - [[User:Cobold|Cobold, <small>Oh my, that's gonna be another four months waiting</small>]] 12:32, 19 February 2008 (EST)
== '''More Items?''' ==
It seems that there are more items than we have explained.  Does anyone know anything about these articles? {{unsigned|Clover456}}
== Incomplete? ==
Why is the plot incomplete?{{User:Mariofanical/sig}} 21:53, 19 February 2008 (EST)
:I'm guessing the writer of the plot never bothered finishing it-and none of us have the game 'cuss its not released in America yet so we don't know the plot. <span style="font-family:verdana; color:#red;"><font size="5">'''[[User:Paper Jorge|P]]'''aper '''Jorge'''</font></span><small> ( [[User talk:Paper Jorge|Talk]]<tt>&middot;</tt>[[Special:Contributions/Paper Jorge|Contributions]])<tt>&middot;</tt></small>
:Well that was a waste of reading{{User:Mariofanical/sig}} 17:10, 20 February 2008 (EST)
== Storyline ==
As I've actually SEEN the videos (I don't remember Toon Link being with Kirby at the start), I'd like to request that I be in charge of telling the story. [[User:PaperBowser|PaperBowser]] 15:19, 22 February 2008 (EST)
:Or for that matter, make a new article on the summary of the story? [[User:PaperBowser|PaperBowser]] 15:23, 22 February 2008 (EST)
::I think we should merge the Storyline section into the Subspace Emissary section, they're literally the same. - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 07:40, 24 February 2008 (EST)
:::So PaperBowser is in charge now{{User:Mariofanical/sig}} 13:32, 24 February 2008 (EST)
::Actually, no one can be "in charge" of editing anything if I understand it right. {{User:Stumpers/sig}} 23:06, 24 February 2008 (EST)
:::Stumpers is right. Anyone can edit. <span style="font-family:verdana; color:#red;"><font size="5">'''[[User:Paper Jorge|P]]'''aper '''Jorge'''</font></span><small> ( [[User talk:Paper Jorge|Talk]]<tt>&middot;</tt>[[Special:Contributions/Paper Jorge|Contributions]])<tt>&middot;</tt></small>
{{talk archive|Talk: Super Smash Bros. Brawl}}

Latest revision as of 14:39, May 31, 2024

X mark.svg This is an archive of past discussions. It is kept for historical reference only. If this page is unprotected, do not edit the contents. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Super Smash Bros. Brawl Talk

Porky's Machine

The article should be changed because I don't think that's Porky's "Absolutely Safe Machine", isn't that the big sphere with the window on it? Not the one pictured.

Comic Kid

Question Mark?

This has already most likely been discussed, but why on Earth are we not making pages for the newer moves that have been discovered? We know what they do and the Dojo!! confirmed them. Even if we don't have pictures, we should get them soon enough… there's nothing to hide on Smash Bros. Dojo move and final smash-wise. Shineget!.png Para Yoshi Parayoshiicon.jpg Wahoo! Mommy!.png 09:59, 26 January 2008 (EST)

We only know the names, so that's all were including. Wait for 6 day, k. HyperToad ;)

If you know what the move does, you are free to make the page. But like Hyper said, we (or at least I) don't know what the moves do. If you do know their effect you are welcome to ake the pages. Paper Jorge ( Talk·Contributions· Paper Jorge was here at 10:30, 26 January 2008 (EST)
Okay, I understand. Thanks! Shineget!.png Para Yoshi Parayoshiicon.jpg Wahoo! Mommy!.png 14:01, 26 January 2008 (EST)
Sorry for double-posting, but what if I have a [brawlcentral.com reliable source] that has told me what the moves do (I have played a demo, therefore knowing Pit's and Ike's moves already)? Can I make pages for those moves if they come from Brawl Central? Shineget!.png Para Yoshi Parayoshiicon.jpg Wahoo! Mommy!.png 19:45, 28 January 2008 (EST)

Characters select screen complete..?

In this video from Gametrailers appears the following screenshot with the character selection screen. I think is a very bad fake, specially if u look the 2D artworks along the 3D official arts... but, indeed, i put the pic if it's necessary for something... we can considere it real? fake?--Caith Sith 08:55, 27 January 2008 (EST)

FAKE

File:Brawlposiblefakeroster.jpg

It is very much fake. If you look at all other sources, they feature Zelda and Sheik in the same selection window. Also, there's no reason for them to completely rearrange the characters on the screen when you unlock more. - Cobold (talk · contribs) 09:14, 27 January 2008 (EST)
Ok :P Delete it if you can...--Caith Sith 09:27, 27 January 2008 (EST)
Why? We'd better be prepared if others come and claim it is real. - Cobold (talk · contribs) 09:30, 27 January 2008 (EST)

And look at Luigi! That is one of his Mario Party Artworks. Torngentleman2 At last, we have the real pic.--Caith Sith 11:44, 30 January 2008 (EST)


At last, we have the real pic.

--Caith Sith 11:45, 30 January 2008 (EST)


Release Preparations

As seen above, fake rosters and information is exploding on YouTube, which is a major problem. The Dojo will most likely not post the full cast including unlockables after the release, which makes the internet our only source. I propose full-protecting the page a day before the release to the day after which prevents the worst spam and gives us time to get reliable sources.

This is the latest official roster:
BrawlScreenDemo.jpg
This is a reliable source:
2008_01_22(2).jpg
This is FAKE:
File:Brawlposiblefakeroster.jpg

How to identify a fake roster? Fake rosters are commonly pretty easy to determine, as creators are not professionals and forget certain tidbits.

  1. The image is shown from front, not filmed from the screen like #2, and there is no actual "movie", like a player moving the character selection hand over the icons - also, in the still image, no player has selected an unrevealed character. This makes creating fakes more easy.
  2. Fake rosters which dozens of character scale down the icons of the official roster to make all their surprises fit in - this never happens in the actual game. We have our official starting roster revealed in #2, and it is unlikely that those icons will scale down as more characters get unlocked.
  3. Fakers use wrong images - the above fake image #3 shows Zelda alone in her box - while the official roster has Sheik in the same box as well. If you can also make out past official artwork images in the roster, it is fake as well - currently, all Brawl characters have an image in a stance they have not shown before, all poses are unique to Brawl. If the picture of a "newcomer" looks cut out from previous Nintendo art, it can't be correct. Check out for Brawl's graphical style, it's unique and very detailed. In fake #3, Bowser Jr. on the top left doesn't match with this style, his colors are too intense.

Please keep a clear head when determining fakes out there. - Do not edit the list of characters before we have determined the credibility of your source. All new information goes onto the talk page first. - Cobold (talk · contribs) 13:54, 27 January 2008 (EST)

Yes, we better look out for fake pictures. Also, I support the full protection. It's just going to get spammy and fake-y. Paper Jorge ( Talk·Contributions)·

Maybe full protection could be a good idea, but we should definitely unprotect one day before JPN release. About the fake image and rising speculation, it would be best to describe it here. On a side note, when removing Template:new subject, please update the article as well, removing terms like "will be" and "upcoming" in the articles with the template.Knife (talk) 15:46, 27 January 2008 (EST)

Template:new subject has a note attached to it which is underlined and says that the template stays until the article has been updated. So within the first days, we shouldn't remove anything.
Also, I said it should be protected at exactly the time of the release, where they will be the most spam and unconfirmed info. Before or after the protection wouldn't make much sense. - Cobold (talk · contribs) 15:49, 27 January 2008 (EST)
I believe, ET USA, from noon on 1/30 to noon 1/31 is good for a full protection time. In Japan that's like at 5-6am 1/31 to 2/1. Wa Yoshihead.png TC@Y 16:28, 27 January 2008 (EST)
On second thought, it doesn't seem like a good idea. We've never had to take these many precautions for any pre-game releases and I think we are overestimating the potential vandalism for this page. Semi-protection is enough to keep those new spammers out, at least for a while. But it is definitely not worth removing other regular users right to expand this page in fear of vandals. And if it does get heavily vandalized, we can always sort things out later. I know there will be vandalism that day, but not as much vandalism as you guys are thinking about.Knife (talk) 19:45, 27 January 2008 (EST)
That's possibly true. I wouldn't be able to do it after Wayoshi's plan anyway, it would be around midnight for me. - Cobold (talk · contribs) 09:50, 28 January 2008 (EST)


There seem to be more items pictured in that picture than we have listed. Does anyone know what they are?

Wind Waker character design

“Right. The development for Smash Bros. Melee began soon after the GameCube was released and we had to design each character from scratch. This time, however, we were able to borrow characters from various development teams, which was a big help. Take The Wind Waker and Twilight Princess from the Zelda series for example. We were able to design the Smash Bros. characters by adapting them just as they were modeled for the original titles.”
Masahiro Sakurai, Wii.com - Iwata Asks: Super Smash Bros. Brawl, vol. 5, page 3

It's pretty obvious in here that they have designed a Wind Waker character - just leaves the question whether playable or assist trophy, unlikely cut-out when he mentions it now. - Cobold (talk · contribs) 11:57, 28 January 2008 (EST)

I think is a Link alt. costume. Xpike the hedgehog that the reason

Well, it's not like I'm going "ZOMG Wind Waker link confirmed", they are talking about regular trophies after all, and this whole interview wouldn't reveal something big, they're not serious enough to do that, they're laughing all the time. But they have some very interesting tidbits, like confirming Jeff as Assist Trophy, or that they wanted to include Final Smashes in the N64 Smash Bros. It's definitely worth reading. - Cobold (talk · contribs) 12:50, 28 January 2008 (EST)
I wouldn't suspect yet that it is anything more than the Wind Waker Link trophy we saw. If you noticed, it was cell shaded and all of that good stuff, so that could be what he's talking about. Still, I would like to, in the near future, read Iwata Asks and create a separate "Developement" section for the article. Stumpers! 19:24, 28 January 2008 (EST)
Put this stage and character on the list. [1]
The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lanky kong (talk).
Without a serious source, no. - Cobold (talk · contribs) 14:52, 29 January 2008 (EST)

Wait a second…

Brawl central says SSBB will cover 128 blocks! That can't be right! Can it? Shineget!.png Para Yoshi Parayoshiicon.jpg Wahoo! Mommy!.png 19:47, 28 January 2008 (EST)

Unfortunately yes.Knife (talk) 20:08, 28 January 2008 (EST)

This means that they put WAY too much stuff in the game. Paper Jorge ( Talk·Contributions)·

Honestly, your right Jorge, there's so much stupid stuff that really isn't needed. HyperToad

Well it must certainly be good. Also, could someone answer my question in the first topic? Shineget!.png Para Yoshi Parayoshiicon.jpg Wahoo! Mommy!.png 22:26, 28 January 2008 (EST)

MARTH's in BRAWL, NO doubt YO

See here! http://gonintendo.com/?p=34382#more-34382 And here, at 1 45 http://gonintendo.com/?p=34381#comments

There's no denying with that footage that he is indeed IN and likely playable. P.S, Ness also :lol:Fixitup

I also obtained this you guys...[[2]] Fixitup

Yo, thanks for this, Fixit! This is great news, thanks for helping us out! =) My Bloody Valentine

It's gold!! P.S Although I beleive the Luigi and Marth stuff from before is real, I believe this image may be fake. Doesnt mean ness isnt in though... [[3]] Fixitup

Oh well, still helpful. It does look like those three are in the game, regardless of if that pic is fake or not. This is great news, thanks! My Bloody Valentine

More Luigi stuff. Lol, you're gonna run out of words DP. :D [[4]] [[5]] P.s Fixed links Im working my fingers to the bone here! Fixitup

Is this new? [[6]] Fixitup

Hey, i noticed in that last screen shot sonic wasn't in this but Olimar is, either this is fake, or you hafta unlock him...

Master Crash

Sonic and Snake have been confirmed to be unlockable. My Bloody Valentine

So far Ness, Luigi, Marth, and Capatain Falcon are confirmed to be unlockable characters.Fixitup

Where was the Captain confirmed? My Bloody Valentine

Baby, it'll rock your mind! [[7]]I'll retrieve the C. Falcon imagery in a sec, YO. Fixitup

Currently having issues finding the C. Falcon screenshot, but here's some Falco to make up for it. [[8]] Fixitup

Falcon- PUNCH! [[9]] Fixitup

Wow, you seem quite excited over this. But I'm not surprised, this is big information! So many articles to edit! So much information to add! Thanks for the images, Fixit. Your a real big help. =) My Bloody Valentine

Snake parts. :P [[10]] [[11]] [[12]] [[13]] [[14]] [[15]] Gotta go now! Fixitup

Ok, thats all i found.

The really complete roster: brawlrosterhp8.jpg Two more thophies: 263iv7m.jpg

A lot of more pics:

Luigi 51822.png iup547311.jpg


lucas y ness 2s6pmoi.jpg ness's smash? 1201607599015.jpg


Luigi 2qd367q.jpg final smash? 2duce4k.jpg


ganondorf up253897.jpg


capitán falcon smash final? 1201609443700.jpg


lucario up253926no9.jpg


Mr.G&W up253939yi1.jpg smash final? 1201606859663.jpg

All taken from there. Is in Spanish, but all the info is in spoiler. Just click, because all are new pictures -no text info-.--Caith Sith 08:10, 29 January 2008 (EST)

If that's really the complete roster, where's Sonic and Jigglypuff? --Trogga 11:17, 29 January 2008 (EST)
Unlockables?--Caith Sith 11:21, 29 January 2008 (EST)
But isn't Snake an unlockable? --Trogga 11:26, 29 January 2008 (EST)
Huh...yes, but whatever... 7 min of free brawl spoilers that confirms a lot of things: characters and more -> click!--Caith Sith 11:45, 29 January 2008 (EST)

Remove Ganondorf

Sorry to burst you're bubble, but seeing his face in a screenshot doesn't confirm him as playable. HyperToad

OF COURSE he is playable lol and

 :| McWolf

Heh. He might be a boss, you know. Also, this is GREAT! Japanese is already leaking info. Paper Jorge ( Talk·Contributions)·
Lucario, Ness, and Jigglypuff are IN. Everyone else (Ganondorf, G&W, ROB, and Luigi) looks good. PLEASE LET LUIGI BE IN... 3dhammer.gif 3D, AAAAAAAH! 3dhammer.gif

Toon Link is in!

File:0181465001201628972.jpg
The preceding unsigned comment was added by Xluidi (talk).

AWESOME! Paper Jorge ( Talk·Contributions)·

Bomberman?

In another video (http://es.youtube.com/watch?v=vtWxwsR3oB4 please see here), we can see another character select list... this time is the same as always, but with Sonic added and... Bomberman. Maybe fake, i dunno, but... well, i put it here.

File:Otherlist.jpg

In any case, with all the info leaked today, we have A LOT OF WORK with this game, specially updating templates.--Caith Sith 14:55, 29 January 2008 (EST)

Look at Dedede's image, it looks wrong. HyperToad

I'm fairly sure that Bomberman image is fake, it's look like it was photoshoped out of a 3d bomerman game. HyperToad

WW Link, G&W, R.O.B

Found this stuff, Yo.[[16]] Fixitup

Conjectural Info

Lately, multiple Users have been adding conjectural info into articles for "Supposedly" in-game characters. Some good examples are Ridley, and Lucario, which was deleted. I personally believe all these leaked screenshots to be fake, but we don't know what's real and what isn't. As such, I feel unless these are confirmed, we should add no conjectural info. Also, I've made fake screenshots just like the ones people are posting right now millions of times on some old forums I was on. They were convincing and really easy to make. I've had multiple people, namely the users KingBoo and McDimentio give me "leaked" videos that supposedly show characters to be confirmed. You can believe that they are real (They aren't. >_>), but please don't add any info. KingBoo has not done so, but McDimentio created a Lucario article and everything. Anyway, conjectural info = No go. f_cm_767603a.pngChaos NEEDS MOAR NINJI f_cm_767603a.png

I know Jigglypuff was confirmed in a leak, so where is it?Knife (talk) 18:06, 29 January 2008 (EST)

Proof?

I beleive that all this news is crap and care to give some source?F gLarrynana.gif

Google is your friend. NMRodo

"Proof"

So far, the ONLY characters confirmed by Nintendo not seen at the Dojo are Jigglypuff, Ness, and Lucario. They were accidentally leaked in a Wii demo video at the Japanese Dojo site. Also, Ness is seen in the opening of the official Brawl game released in Japan. For now, let's treat all material not done BY NINTENDO as crap. 3dhammer.gif 3D, NO MATTER HOW OFFICIAL IT LOOKS! 3dhammer.gif

Marth appears in the opening too, and Luigi appeared on a youtube video, were King Dedede transforms him into a trophy.Javier12345 20:34, 29 January 2008 (EST)

Green Hill Zone Stage CONFIRMED

0332513001201630138.jpg Here it is User:SonicMario/sig

Isn't there also a YouTube video with this stage in it? I can't remember. Stumpers! 19:54, 29 January 2008 (EST)

Wolf... Star Wolf

[[17]] Fixitup

This isnt fake. Wolf is in Brawl ^_^.
Hopefully. I still think there's gonna be more than 35 people tohugh. Seriously, unlocking everyone through the story modes only?Fixitup

I think that's fake, he has the same FS, WTF? Let's just wait untill tomarrrow, untill then everyone just stop HyperToad 07:35, 30 January 2008 (EST)

Well it could be Fox's alternative costume, which I haven't seen. And stop? Stop what? Stop adding real information? ...NO. Paper Jorge ( Talk·Contributions)·
  1. No Jorge, I meant STOP ADDING LINKS! It's too confusing.
  2. It has it's own name, so if this is real, it's a new character, alter. costumes don't get special names, not een Peach's daisy costume.
  3. I'm sure that there are going to be more character then we think, maybe even going up to 50.
  4. HyperToad@Super Smash Bros. Brawl/Archive 4HT Sig.png
PJ, Pokemon DP made us wait to make an article for Peach Blossom until it was announced on the site a day later. I think it has something to do with the conjecture stuff. I personally don't mind... especially when it's going to be "announced" in 24 hours, but HyperToad has a point. :( I don't like fights. Stumpers! 16:24, 30 January 2008 (EST)

Who is this guy?

He is on here (http://es.youtube.com/watch?v=vtWxwsR3oB4 please see here) Who is that guy when it shows a image of a spaceship thing in the desert,then it shows a big robot guy with purple skin and a spike on his head?(note:the images that I'm talking about are the 9th and 10th images the guy shows)(note2:it shows this guys images after it shows the image that said Falcon Punch Comfirmed) Luigi-Tron 3000

The link you've posted is broken, there's no YouTube video with that address. - Cobold (talk · contribs) 10:43, 30 January 2008 (EST)
I just fixed it User:Luigi-Tron 3000
I didn't find any unknown character in there. Check this page, there's some info about Subspace Emissary bosses. - Cobold (talk · contribs) 10:53, 30 January 2008 (EST)
Note that I'm not talking about Porky User:Luigi-Tron3000

True rooster?

(Brawl_roster.jpg) Luigi-Tron 3000 Maybe... HyperToad

Yes, it is. Is uploaded and in the Brawl article.--Caith Sith 12:00, 30 January 2008 (EST)
Don't add it unless you have proof! Where'd it come from? HyperToad

yes, it is, wwe dont have a REAL proof, but yeah, this is the offical rooster McWolf

That's contridary, if you have no proof, then how do you know it's offical. HyperToad Not that I don't believe it, but we need prove, or it might get removed.

This rooster was seen in various youtube videos. So yes, its official...--Caith Sith 12:47, 30 January 2008 (EST)

It doesn't matter if it is real, obviously all the secret characters wouldn't be unlocked using only sse and c modes. There's room for another row. Fixitup

LOL! Rooster? It's called Roster. :P Paper Jorge ( Talk·Contributions)·
One thing I noticed about this is that the series tend to line up vertically (Mario, Luigi, Peach, Bowser on the left... the sub-Mario's on the next column, etc. Anyway, that alone makes it seem real, because most fakes have just slammed things together. But I'm kind of late to the party saying this. Stumpers! 13:59, 2 February 2008 (EST)

Lucario stage and Jiggly's final smash

col_lanza.jpg

P.D: I don't know why Jiggly is a a giant...--Caith Sith 14:27, 30 January 2008 (EST)

It's supposed to be Jigglypuff's Final Smash...though I don't see that image. - Cobold (talk · contribs) 15:29, 30 January 2008 (EST)

This, I can say looks fake. Fixitup

Isn't Jiggly FS, i think it's a Event McWolf

Luigi's Mansion

http://youtube.com/watch?v=vdMVPS_CQL8

The Luigi's Mansion stage in Brawl. Luigi pwned. ~ TheGreenFire

Who is this guy? Part 2

A space ship mode of him up253909.jpg

A front view of him in Robot mode 2227949227_3cf377bcb8_o.jpg

MetaKnight fighting him up253911.jpg

So who is this guy?

Luigi-Tron 3000

An unnamed boss. Paper Jorge ( Talk·Contributions)·
The Japanese name reads "Gareomu". - Cobold (talk · contribs) 10:24, 31 January 2008 (EST)

Bowser and Gonnondorf teaming up?

0187929001201622089.jpg
An unlikely duo. Mcoolister Coolister2.png T, C, R

THe image doesn't display. Also, the duo isn't unlikely, they're both antagonists. - Cobold (talk · contribs) 12:45, 31 January 2008 (EST)

Chraracters

Shouldn't we wait before adding every single character? Myabe there playable, maybe not.

Master Crash

They were all confirmed by the various images of the character selection screen, which isn't fake as above - there were various sources with the same screen, and videos of selection of the characters as well as gameplay of them. For example, there is this video where all playable characters appear in a single event match. - Cobold (talk · contribs) 15:50, 31 January 2008 (EST)

Character selection screen image

Brawl mode of Super Smash Bros. Brawl

I was adding Image:Brawl_Brawl.jpg to the Group section of this page, but Fixitup says "we don't need it". A pretty useless statement, per se we don't need any images in the whole article. I just thought that it is an easy explanation of the selection choices for the Pokémon Trainer and Sheik, so that we don't need to state it at an unclear point in the article's text. I don't think it's useless, it's fine there. Don't worry about too many images, the text will get more now. - Cobold (talk · contribs) 15:43, 31 January 2008 (EST)

My vote is for Cobold: it was a good image to show that the game is more in depth about switching characters than the last one, and I fail to see how the image had a "rediculously long" explaination. Stumpers! 16:11, 31 January 2008 (EST)
I agree that there were grammatical problems in the description, but that's something that can easily be fixed. - Cobold (talk · contribs) 16:22, 31 January 2008 (EST)
Wow, I think it's pretty obvious you could've come to me about this before crying wolf. The image IS useless, and so is it's description. The article has areas for text for a reason. Images are not so you can explain something that takes up a ridiculous looking amount of room in the thumbnail. If we were to have an image to describe every bit of news like this, the article wouldn't have text anywhere except in images. Wow, wouldn't that be great?... Fixitup
Fixitup, you're forgetting that we don't have every image from the Dojo. Stumpers! 15:57, 1 February 2008 (EST)
Useless? Why useless? It is currently the only image I see with a thumbnail description that deserves the name "description". Most images are images of characters, stages and items which aren't thumbnailed anyway. Why should it be useless. What would be your suggestion of where to put the content in the text instead? - Cobold (talk · contribs) 16:37, 1 February 2008 (EST)
WOW! If you were confused as to where you should place such information, you could've simply asked. Here, I'll do just that for you! :B Fixitup
I think you misunderstood. I was actually saying that I don't think there is any good place except for an image description - it's not too long either, not on my resolution. Looks fine now. - Cobold (talk · contribs) 17:14, 1 February 2008 (EST)

New Stage

Here, Sakurai mentions a Port Town Aero Dive stage from F-Zero. But is there actually any information on this stage? With the recent leaks in the game and stuff, there should be at least some information on this stage... Paper Jorge ( Talk·Contributions)·

I saw gameplay on a stage where the player unlocked Captain Falcon, but I don't know its name, and I've not player F Zero GX enough to identify it. - Cobold (talk · contribs) 08:12, 1 February 2008 (EST)

Secret Fighters

We need a seperate subsection in the characters section for secret characters. That way, spoiler-haters won't accidentally read about secret characters. NMRodo

Yeah, I was already suggestion changing it from Veterans - Newcomers to Default Characters - Unlockables. Though I would suggest a completely new layout for the character section, like the one of Super Smash Bros. Melee, it's much better. - Cobold (talk · contribs) 16:43, 1 February 2008 (EST)
Okay, so I started the layout from the Melee article, but... I kinda destroyed the whole thing in the process. NMRodo
It's all in the history for reference. - Cobold (talk · contribs) 18:33, 1 February 2008 (EST)
Cobold: If you could do that, that would be great. It's very hard to read as it currently is. Stumpers! 18:53, 1 February 2008 (EST)

Mwahaha- Feel my wrath, it is complete. Feel free to improve. I just gotta go feed myself before I die. Fixitup UPDATE- Whoa-whoa-whoa-whoa! All of the sudden, bars/lines for the chart are dissapearing! What's happenin'??Fixitup

Good job, Fixitup! I see little room for improvement, except for any video footage of the non-DOJO!!-announced characters using special moves. NMRodo
Dag, yo, Fixitup... you're always reliable! Thanks a bundle! Stumpers! 20:52, 1 February 2008 (EST)

All Characters revealed!!!???

That doesn't seem like that is every single character. It just doesn't seem like what Sakauri would want as the FINAL list. Or am I overreacting? Is the final roster really revealed or not? Shineget!.png Para Yoshi Parayoshiicon.jpg Wahoo! Mommy!.png 18:08, 1 February 2008 (EST)

From what we've heard, the All-Star mode was unlocked by unlocking all characters seen in the roster. I also saw an event match which featured all playable characters. - Cobold (talk · contribs) 18:24, 1 February 2008 (EST)
I don't think those are all the caharcters, like why would there be an animal crossing symbol if there is no playable Animal Crossing character, and what about Krystal, someone will voice her, has she been confirmed as assist trophy or what? Javier12345 20:42, 1 February 2008 (EST)
Krystal and other members of the Star Fox Team appears in various conditions and talk with Fox. Like Snake's Codec with Mei Ling, Otacon and Campbell. This is Fox special taunt... --Caith Sith 20:52, 1 February 2008 (EST)

I saw a youtube about Ashely in the brawl. And Waach this video to see if it's true. GiGi25

ofc is fake -_-McWolf
What do you mean, "ofc"? - Cobold (talk · contribs) 17:04, 2 February 2008 (EST)
I hear Ashely's a background character in the WarioWare stage. --Trogga 21:26, 3 February 2008 (EST)

Sonic and Snake?

On the page it says that Sonic and Snake are default characters, well in this pic, it differs [18]


The MissingLinkBowser 2.PNG Very strange.......

We're going off of the character page on the Dojo website: the character page now differentiates between veterans, newcomers, and secret characters. Go check it out. Stumpers! 21:16, 1 February 2008 (EST)

ofc snake and sonic are secrets, sakurai just showed them to do merchandising McWolf

All sources we've seen on the internet showed us them as unlockables. When looking at the Dojo page carefully, there is now a header "secret characters", but the other section is not labeled "default characters" in return. - Cobold (talk · contribs) 12:38, 2 February 2008 (EST)

They cant be starters if a pic on brawl doesnt show them in the character sceneAlphaclaw11 12:54, 2 February 2008 (EST)

Well, whatever you guys want. I don't care at all, but was just answering Dry Bones' question. Stumpers! 13:55, 2 February 2008 (EST)


Spoilers tag

Should we add a Spoiler tag to warn non user? Princess Grapes Butterfly

i think that so McWolf

The question is, though, how can we keep them from seeing those pictures? Is there a way we can condense 'em and let users click if they want to see? Stumpers! 18:25, 2 February 2008 (EST)


Delay!

In the Trivia section it states that Geno was planned to be in the game.(Which some user caim that it caused the delay.) I think this is fales. Any soures that prove this?. Also on X-play they stated that the game was delay do to Wi-Fi. Princess Grapes Butterfly 19:17, 2 February 2008 (EST)

Yeah, that sounds really suspicious, especially considering that you have a reliable source there that says something different. Stumpers! 11:42, 3 February 2008 (EST)

and some people say it's because of Leon of RE series McWolf

I heard that this was on some SMRPG fansite. Not exactly trustworthy. NMRodo

We got the whole SSE.

http://brawlcentral.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=57&t=4747

The entire collection of Subspace Emissary clips is now available on YouTube. NMRodo Big help to the article, right?

Thank you for the marvelous answer. NMRodo

Character tables

Why were character tables changed? We don't need a Series section (that's what series icons are for), and now hard it's to tell the Pokémon Trainer's B moves apart. --Trogga 21:23, 3 February 2008 (EST)

The series section could really go if we have the icons, but about Pokémon Trainer, we better split him up into Squirtle/Ivysaur/Charizard. - Cobold (talk · contribs) 05:27, 4 February 2008 (EST)

The icons look weird on their own is the thing.Fixitup

(I changed "on" to "own"... I think that's what you meant, Fixitup.) Cobold, what are we going to do about the artwork, though? Stumpers! 22:19, 4 February 2008 (EST)
Maybe...we design a different layout for the tables. But I guess we agree that the previous was rather unhandy to and especially edit. - Cobold (talk · contribs) 04:57, 5 February 2008 (EST)

All the Costumes for All Characters

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RIHJHkzSdxs&eurl=http://brawlcentral.com/

These are some cool costumes! =) Luigi-Tron 3000

ALL THE CHARACTERS' FINAL SMASHS!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2HU_AJbx10Q&eurl=http://brawlcentral.com/news.php

Now we know all the final smashs =) Luigi-Tron 3000

A simple note could have done it. - Cobold (talk · contribs) 05:42, 7 February 2008 (EST)

New Boss

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j7oLrs9iLt8

http://it.youtube.com/watch?v=7jrUVkuD0lw

Boss Battle starts at 5:05 of video 1 and at the start of video 2.It looks like you have to fight him 2 times.We could add him to the boss list.

Luigi-Tron 3000

Series

Can we remove that series section on the Characters table, and move the Emblem to the name section? The Emblem is enough. My Bloody Valentine And it takes too much space on the Unlockable table.

Yes, we already agreed on that above, but yet nobody had time to edit the table. - Cobold (talk · contribs) 05:16, 8 February 2008 (EST)
OK, I can do it right now. My Bloody Valentine

All SSE levels!

http://www.youtube.com/user/fairuzons This user uploaded all 32 levels of the SSE
The preceding unsigned comment was added by Freekhenstra (talk).

Music

Care to explain why we need to clutter up the article with MUSIC! Music of all things! HyperToad

"Clutter up"? We're so far only listing the tracks. - Cobold (talk · contribs) 08:58, 8 February 2008 (EST)
Well still, I think it's not noteworthy to the article. It makes the article bigger then it has to be. HyperToad You said yourself, a wiki isn't just supposed to give all infomation avalible, but noteworthy infomation.
We could move it to a separate article which is in Category:Music, it's generally done with soundtracks. The list of componists could stay in this article or be moved, I'm not sure. - Cobold (talk · contribs) 09:22, 8 February 2008 (EST)
Now that I think of it, the staff section usually also gets split into an article. But currently we don't have Brawl's full credits, so I'm unsure where to put the composers' section. It can stay in the article until we find a solution. - Cobold (talk · contribs) 09:31, 8 February 2008 (EST)
Hold up here, what's all this about "noteworthy" information? That's really vague. But, seeing as the music is something that Sakurai has always stressed on his site and in his interview with Iwata (and others, too, I remember), it's definately important info. Not that it has to be in this article, of course. Stumpers! 18:21, 10 February 2008 (EST)

Split up Pokémon Trainer?

As Cobold told, I also think that the Pokémon Trainer's three Pokémon should get their own entries in the table. They are individual characters with individual stats and attacks and completely different appearances. Zero Suit Samus and Sheik also have their own entries, though "only" being alternate forms. --Grandy02 09:52, 8 February 2008 (EST)

If the current table design stays (if you don't like it, we're always open to new solutions), then he definitely should be split up. Though the Pokémon Trainer himself should probably still be on the list. - Cobold (talk · contribs) 09:54, 8 February 2008 (EST)
Yes, of course, the entry for the Pokémon Trainer still must stay. I didn't want to remove it, just three new entries for his Pokémon. And by the way, Squirtle and Ivysaur should get better main images. Only Charizard's image is focused on the Pokémon itself, the images of the two other ones show them together with other characters. --Grandy02 09:58, 8 February 2008 (EST)

ZSS and Sheik have their own profiles on the OFFICAL SITE, the PT's pokemon do not. HyperToad

The official site isn't the only possible way of organizing Brawl content. We don't want to have a copy of it on this page. This is the Mario Wiki article on Brawl, not the Dojo. - Cobold (talk · contribs) 11:40, 8 February 2008 (EST)
Are you inmplying we know better then the people who made the game? HyperToad
No. We don't "know better" when splitting the Pokémon Trainer up into three entries on our list. We just take a different approach on ordering. - Cobold (talk · contribs) 11:44, 8 February 2008 (EST)
I'm just saying if the site identifies them as one character, then that's clearly the way it's supposed to work. How about we spli up the Ice Climbers while we're at it? HyperToad
>.> Splitting up Pokémon Trainer is mainly done for practical reasons. Squirtle, Ivysaur and Charizard have a moveset on their own. Zelda and Sheik have, too, as do Samus and Zero Suit Samus. Ice Climbers do not, the second Ice Climber isn't even playable. This is the way the characters fit best in to the table, that's all. - Cobold (talk · contribs) 11:52, 8 February 2008 (EST)
Eehheheheheh, actually, the second Ice Climber is playable (Costume Change), but I agree with you, the Pokemons are distinct enough to have their own articles. --Blitzwing 11:56, 8 February 2008 (EST)
We're currently not talking about articles, but about spaces in the Characters table. - Cobold (talk · contribs) 12:02, 8 February 2008 (EST)
D'oh, I am such a doofus. Well, if they have different statistics and moveset, I say they are atleast deserving of their own places on the table. --Blitzwing 12:06, 8 February 2008 (EST)

More ways to unlock the hidden characters?

http://boards.gamefaqs.com/gfaqs/genmessage.php?board=928518&topic=41190421

Are this ways true? Luigi-Tron 3000

Ness's and Marth's alternate ways of unlocking have already stated like that on the Dojo. - Cobold (talk · contribs) 11:39, 8 February 2008 (EST)

New boss again

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iCKZnVy8AMw

Game and Watch Robot guy boss! Luigi-Tron 3000

All Star boss mode

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l_s5fwuH-Ik

Like all star mode,but with bosses.And also,Crazy Hand is in! Luigi-Tron 3000

location from the Melee in the Brawl!!!!

watch this video.0_o Star.gifGissyStar.gifSuper Azumanga RPG

Yes, that's Yoshi's Island from Super Smash Bros. Melee, which was confirmed on the Melee Stages: Part 2 update. In other words, we already know that stage is returning, but, thanks anyway. My Bloody Valentine

Oh. Star.gifGissyStar.gifSuper Azumanga RPG

lol, I love the ending, Gissy. I guess those blocks will defy all logic in this title, too. Stumpers! 18:25, 10 February 2008 (EST)

European Release date confirmed

It will be released in Europe on June 6, 2008. Links (both dutch sites): http://www.nonly.nl/nieuws/4655/Releasedatum_Super_Smash_Bros._Brawl_bekend/ http://www.gamersnet.nl/nieuws/200802/super_smash_bros_brawl_verschijnt_6_juni_in_europa/

Now all we need is the Australian release date. Dpiconani448.gifMaster LucarioDpiconani448.gif The Aura is with me...

Also confirmed by this French site. News didn't seem to reach the English-speaking world yet. - Cobold, Oh my, that's gonna be another four months waiting 12:32, 19 February 2008 (EST)

More Items?

It seems that there are more items than we have explained. Does anyone know anything about these articles?
The preceding unsigned comment was added by Clover456 (talk).

Incomplete?

Why is the plot incomplete?~Μαριοθανικαλ 21:53, 19 February 2008 (EST)

I'm guessing the writer of the plot never bothered finishing it-and none of us have the game 'cuss its not released in America yet so we don't know the plot. Paper Jorge ( Talk·Contributions)·
Well that was a waste of reading~Μαριοθανικαλ 17:10, 20 February 2008 (EST)

Storyline

As I've actually SEEN the videos (I don't remember Toon Link being with Kirby at the start), I'd like to request that I be in charge of telling the story. PaperBowser 15:19, 22 February 2008 (EST)

Or for that matter, make a new article on the summary of the story? PaperBowser 15:23, 22 February 2008 (EST)
I think we should merge the Storyline section into the Subspace Emissary section, they're literally the same. - Cobold (talk · contribs) 07:40, 24 February 2008 (EST)
So PaperBowser is in charge now~Μαριοθανικαλ 13:32, 24 February 2008 (EST)
Actually, no one can be "in charge" of editing anything if I understand it right. Stumpers! 23:06, 24 February 2008 (EST)
Stumpers is right. Anyone can edit. Paper Jorge ( Talk·Contributions)·
X mark.svg This is an archive of past discussions. It is kept for historical reference only. If this page is unprotected, do not edit the contents. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.