Talk:Vanish Mario: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
I don't know about the official name but we have pages on both other cap forms - Kamicciolo
I don't know about the official name but we have pages on both other cap forms - Kamicciolo
:Well, they would of course also be merged, that isn't an argument. - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 15:28, 24 January 2008 (EST)
:Well, they would of course also be merged, that isn't an argument. - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 15:28, 24 January 2008 (EST)
::But then that would be like merging [[Spring Mario]] and [[Spring Mushroom]] because there isn't enough content. - Kamicciolo
<center>'''''Note: This discussion was moved here from the former "Vanish Luigi" talk page.'''''</center>
I figure since we have several articles that "double" for Luigi and Mario, shouldn't this be merged? [[User:HyperToad|HyperToad]]
:We have [[:Category:Forms]], these are allowed as long as there is enough content. - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 13:30, 30 January 2008 (EST)
::If we have that category then wouldn't [[Mr. L]], [[Rookie]], and [[Shadow Peach]] get articles? [[User:HyperToad|HyperToad]]
:::No. "Shadow Peach" is a conjecturally named form, of course not. - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 13:36, 30 January 2008 (EST)
Okay well why not Rookie or Mr. L though? [[User:HyperToad|HyperToad]]
:We should still merge Vanish Mario and Vanish Luigi, though. They're too similar. -- [[User: Booster|Booster]]
Cobold: I think they mean [[Template:Diff]].{{User:Knife/sig}} 17:15, 30 January 2008 (EST)
I kinda agree with Booster and HyperToad... Vanish Mario and Luigi are the exact same thing, except for who's in the form (Well, the power-up is different, but still). They should be merged. {{User:CrystalYoshi/sig}}
<center>'''''The end of the discussion moved here from the former "Vanish Luigi" talk page. Please do not edit or continue discussion.'''''</center>

Latest revision as of 21:51, December 24, 2009

This isn't an official name, is it? I don't think we need an article for it, the content can fit on Vanish Cap. - Cobold (talk · contribs) 14:20, 24 January 2008 (EST)

I don't know about the official name but we have pages on both other cap forms - Kamicciolo

Well, they would of course also be merged, that isn't an argument. - Cobold (talk · contribs) 15:28, 24 January 2008 (EST)
But then that would be like merging Spring Mario and Spring Mushroom because there isn't enough content. - Kamicciolo
Note: This discussion was moved here from the former "Vanish Luigi" talk page.

I figure since we have several articles that "double" for Luigi and Mario, shouldn't this be merged? HyperToad

We have Category:Forms, these are allowed as long as there is enough content. - Cobold (talk · contribs) 13:30, 30 January 2008 (EST)
If we have that category then wouldn't Mr. L, Rookie, and Shadow Peach get articles? HyperToad
No. "Shadow Peach" is a conjecturally named form, of course not. - Cobold (talk · contribs) 13:36, 30 January 2008 (EST)

Okay well why not Rookie or Mr. L though? HyperToad

We should still merge Vanish Mario and Vanish Luigi, though. They're too similar. -- Booster

Cobold: I think they mean Template:Diff.Knife (talk) 17:15, 30 January 2008 (EST)

I kinda agree with Booster and HyperToad... Vanish Mario and Luigi are the exact same thing, except for who's in the form (Well, the power-up is different, but still). They should be merged. Sprite of the Ruby Star in Paper Mario: The Thousand-Year Door CrystalYoshi Yoshi Egg Sprite.png

The end of the discussion moved here from the former "Vanish Luigi" talk page. Please do not edit or continue discussion.