Talk:Vanish Mario: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I don't know about the official name but we have pages on both other cap forms - Kamicciolo | I don't know about the official name but we have pages on both other cap forms - Kamicciolo | ||
:Well, they would of course also be merged, that isn't an argument. - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 15:28, 24 January 2008 (EST) | :Well, they would of course also be merged, that isn't an argument. - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 15:28, 24 January 2008 (EST) | ||
::But then that would be like merging [[Spring Mario]] and [[Spring Mushroom]] because there isn't enough content. - Kamicciolo | |||
<center>'''''Note: This discussion was moved here from the former "Vanish Luigi" talk page.'''''</center> | |||
I figure since we have several articles that "double" for Luigi and Mario, shouldn't this be merged? [[User:HyperToad|HyperToad]] | |||
:We have [[:Category:Forms]], these are allowed as long as there is enough content. - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 13:30, 30 January 2008 (EST) | |||
::If we have that category then wouldn't [[Mr. L]], [[Rookie]], and [[Shadow Peach]] get articles? [[User:HyperToad|HyperToad]] | |||
:::No. "Shadow Peach" is a conjecturally named form, of course not. - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 13:36, 30 January 2008 (EST) | |||
Okay well why not Rookie or Mr. L though? [[User:HyperToad|HyperToad]] | |||
:We should still merge Vanish Mario and Vanish Luigi, though. They're too similar. -- [[User: Booster|Booster]] | |||
Cobold: I think they mean [[Template:Diff]].{{User:Knife/sig}} 17:15, 30 January 2008 (EST) | |||
I kinda agree with Booster and HyperToad... Vanish Mario and Luigi are the exact same thing, except for who's in the form (Well, the power-up is different, but still). They should be merged. {{User:CrystalYoshi/sig}} | |||
<center>'''''The end of the discussion moved here from the former "Vanish Luigi" talk page. Please do not edit or continue discussion.'''''</center> |
Latest revision as of 21:51, December 24, 2009
This isn't an official name, is it? I don't think we need an article for it, the content can fit on Vanish Cap. - Cobold (talk · contribs) 14:20, 24 January 2008 (EST)
I don't know about the official name but we have pages on both other cap forms - Kamicciolo
- Well, they would of course also be merged, that isn't an argument. - Cobold (talk · contribs) 15:28, 24 January 2008 (EST)
- But then that would be like merging Spring Mario and Spring Mushroom because there isn't enough content. - Kamicciolo
I figure since we have several articles that "double" for Luigi and Mario, shouldn't this be merged? HyperToad
- We have Category:Forms, these are allowed as long as there is enough content. - Cobold (talk · contribs) 13:30, 30 January 2008 (EST)
Okay well why not Rookie or Mr. L though? HyperToad
- We should still merge Vanish Mario and Vanish Luigi, though. They're too similar. -- Booster
Cobold: I think they mean Template:Diff.Knife (talk) 17:15, 30 January 2008 (EST)
I kinda agree with Booster and HyperToad... Vanish Mario and Luigi are the exact same thing, except for who's in the form (Well, the power-up is different, but still). They should be merged. CrystalYoshi