Talk:Bowser Bomb (Mario Party DS): Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Text replacement - "([Pp]roposal|[Ss]ettled)(Outcome|TPP)" to "$1 $2")
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Delete this page ==
== Delete this page ==
 
{{Settled TPP}}
{{TPP}}
{{Proposal outcome|passed|10-0|delete}}
Appearing in only one minigame, with only one real purpose, I consider this to be nothing short of a generic subject (is the name of this article even official?). We don't have an article on the Wiggler mechas in [[Wheelin' and Wigglin']], nor do we have an article on the bomb in the shape of Bowser's face in [[Bowser's Big Blast]], so why should this get an article?
Appearing in only one minigame, with only one real purpose, I consider this to be nothing short of a generic subject (is the name of this article even official?). We don't have an article on the Wiggler mechas in [[Wheelin' and Wigglin']], nor do we have an article on the bomb in the shape of Bowser's face in [[Bowser's Big Blast]], so why should this get an article?



Latest revision as of 15:22, May 31, 2024

Delete this page[edit]

Settledproposal.svg This talk page proposal has already been settled. Please do not edit any of the sections in the proposal. If you wish to discuss the article, do so in a new header below the proposal.

delete 10-0
Appearing in only one minigame, with only one real purpose, I consider this to be nothing short of a generic subject (is the name of this article even official?). We don't have an article on the Wiggler mechas in Wheelin' and Wigglin', nor do we have an article on the bomb in the shape of Bowser's face in Bowser's Big Blast, so why should this get an article?

P.S.: The only reason why we have Mechanical Cricket is because they are officially named. As far as I can tell, this has no proven official name!

Proposer: Toadette the Achiever (talk)
Deadline: April 2, 2018, 23:59 GMT

Support[edit]

  1. Toadette the Achiever (talk) Per proposal.
  2. 7feetunder (talk) Object exclusive to a single Mario Party minigame with a completely made-up name (in-game description just calls it a "bomb")? No thanks.
  3. Waluigi Time (talk) Keeping this article would set a horrible precedent of making an article for every item in every minigame. Better put an end to it now.
  4. Owencrazyboy9 (talk) Might as well get rid of this one. Toadette the Achiever's points are really swell, but I'm not sure if the Mechanical cricket/grasshopper article should go or not. Hmm... Per all.
  5. BBQ Turtle (talk) This article seems purely pointless, per all.
  6. Alex95 (talk) - Could be merged with Bowser Bomb (Mario Party 2) (which may end up getting moved to "Bowser Bomb (item)" if this proposal passes, btw) somehow, but I don't see the point in that either, so per proposal.
  7. TheFlameChomp (talk) This article seems unnecessary, and there is no source for the current name. Per all.
  8. Mario jc (talk) Basically repeats information from Short Fuse, per all.
  9. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) Maybe the bomb from Bowser's Big Blast, Bowser's Bigger Blast, Head Waiter, and Panic Pinball, as it's a recurring object that appeared in 4 games if one counts The Top 100, but not this. Per all.
  10. bwburke94 (talk) Per all.

Oppose[edit]

Comments[edit]

We don't have an article on the cricket mechas in Quickest Cricket

Yeah about that... BabyLuigiFire.pngRay Trace(T|C) 18:44, 19 March 2018 (EDT)

Thanks...and oops. I didn't even bother to check! Toadette icon CTTT.pngFont of Archivist Toadette's signature(T|C) 19:03, 19 March 2018 (EDT)
Mechanical cricket should not have an article either. Quickest Cricket's in-game text just uses "mechanical cricket" (note the lowercase) as a descriptive term, not a proper name. It doesn't deserve an article any more than the bug vehicles from Insectiride do. Dark BonesSig.png 23:46, 19 March 2018 (EDT)