MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Mario Kart Wii: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (Text replacement - "{{[Ff]a-archive" to "{{FA archive notice") |
||
| (10 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||4}}]]=== | ===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||4}}]]=== | ||
{{ | {{FA archive notice|unfeature=yes}} | ||
Mario Kart Wii was nominated to be unfeatured at 22:45, 14 February 2017 (EST) and passed at 16:32, 15 February 2017 (EST). | |||
==== Remove featured article status ==== | ==== Remove featured article status ==== | ||
#{{User|Supermariofan67}} - I think this page should be unfeatured because it is poorly-written, has many grammar mistakes, and some parts of it are disorganized. To be featured, it should be of similar quality to the [[Mario Kart 8]] article. | #{{User|Supermariofan67}} - I think this page should be unfeatured because it is poorly-written, has many grammar mistakes, and some parts of it are disorganized. To be featured, it should be of similar quality to the [[Mario Kart 8]] article. | ||
#{{User|Baby Luigi}} Mostly per my comments below. The article still has quite a few problems that is enough to remove its FA status. | #{{User|Baby Luigi}} Mostly per my comments below. The article still has quite a few problems that is enough to remove its FA status. | ||
#{{User|Yoshi the Space Station Manager}} definitely looks like it has lost its feature status. | |||
#{{User|Alex95}} Per all | |||
#{{User|3D Player 2010}} per all | |||
==== Keep featured article status ==== | ==== Keep featured article status ==== | ||
| Line 24: | Line 26: | ||
I don't see the "poorly written" nor "many grammar mistakes" complaint though. It's probably being nitpicky at this point. {{User:Baby Luigi/sig}} 00:56, 15 February 2017 (EST) | I don't see the "poorly written" nor "many grammar mistakes" complaint though. It's probably being nitpicky at this point. {{User:Baby Luigi/sig}} 00:56, 15 February 2017 (EST) | ||
@Alex95: That's not a good reason. The user who nominated this added the tag AFTER he nominated the article. You need to look at edit histories for further context. I can easily delete that tag and void your reason. {{User:Baby Luigi/sig}} 16:37, 15 February 2017 (EST) | |||
:I did look at the history, but I guess I'm blind. My bad. {{User:Alex95/sig}} 16:43, 15 February 2017 (EST) | |||
Latest revision as of 16:40, May 31, 2024
Mario Kart Wii[edit]
This is an archive of a successful unfeature article nomination. If this page is unprotected, do not modify its contents, as it is an archive of past discussions.
Mario Kart Wii was nominated to be unfeatured at 22:45, 14 February 2017 (EST) and passed at 16:32, 15 February 2017 (EST).
Remove featured article status[edit]
- Supermariofan67 (talk) - I think this page should be unfeatured because it is poorly-written, has many grammar mistakes, and some parts of it are disorganized. To be featured, it should be of similar quality to the Mario Kart 8 article.
- Baby Luigi (talk) Mostly per my comments below. The article still has quite a few problems that is enough to remove its FA status.
- Yoshi the Space Station Manager (talk) definitely looks like it has lost its feature status.
- Alex95 (talk) Per all
- 3D Player 2010 (talk) per all
Keep featured article status[edit]
Removal of support/oppose votes[edit]
Comments[edit]
The karts can use images. I know I *had* plans to upload renders of the karts but several things kept me from doing so:
- You have to piece bodies, frames, and tires together. This requires extracting a ton of models out of the kart file.
- You have to mirror the tiling for UVs for textures to display properly.
- I was too busy with other things.
Furthermore, this article can use traps and obstacles like Mario Kart 8.
Additionally, the gameplay section is a mess too. I hate how the very first header is "Changes". I still firmly believe it should explain what the main gameplay of it is first for potential new readers without having to jump to different articles for information.
I don't see the "poorly written" nor "many grammar mistakes" complaint though. It's probably being nitpicky at this point. 
Ray Trace(T|C) 00:56, 15 February 2017 (EST)
@Alex95: That's not a good reason. The user who nominated this added the tag AFTER he nominated the article. You need to look at edit histories for further context. I can easily delete that tag and void your reason. Ray Trace(T|C) 16:37, 15 February 2017 (EST)
- I did look at the history, but I guess I'm blind. My bad.
16:43, 15 February 2017 (EST)
