MarioWiki:Featured articles/N2/Super Smash Bros.: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Text replacement - "{{[Ff]a-archive" to "{{FA archive notice")
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
{{fa-archive}}
{{FA archive notice|nominated=23:34, 22 May 2010 (EDT)|passed=14:05, 8 June 2010 (EDT)}}
'''Super Smash Bros. became a featured article at 13:05, 15 June 2010.'''
==== Support ====
==== Support ====
#{{User|Marcelagus}} -- The entire article is much more organized now. Many images are used to depict the aspects of the game, and gameplay/mode sections have been greatly expanded. This article is back up to par as an article of Featured Article quality.
#{{User|Marcelagus}} -- The entire article is much more organized now. Many images are used to depict the aspects of the game, and gameplay/mode sections have been greatly expanded. This article is back up to par as an article of Featured Article quality.
Line 13: Line 12:


==== Removal of Opposes ====
==== Removal of Opposes ====


==== Comments ====
==== Comments ====
Line 21: Line 19:


:Let's just rewrite sentences with "players" instead of "the player" so we don't get this controversial issue. {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}}
:Let's just rewrite sentences with "players" instead of "the player" so we don't get this controversial issue. {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}}
[[Category:FA succession archives]]

Latest revision as of 16:40, May 31, 2024

Smg2 icon bronzestar.png

This is an archive of a successful featured article nomination. If this page is unprotected, do not modify its contents, as it is an archive of past discussions.
Super Smash Bros. was nominated to be a featured article at 23:34, 22 May 2010 (EDT) and passed at 13:05, 15 June 2010.


Support

  1. Marcelagus (talk) -- The entire article is much more organized now. Many images are used to depict the aspects of the game, and gameplay/mode sections have been greatly expanded. This article is back up to par as an article of Featured Article quality.
  2. KS3 (talk)
  3. Commander Code-8 (talk)
  4. Byllant (talk)
  5. BluePikminKong497 (talk)
  6. Paula (talk)

Oppose

Removal of Opposes

Comments

I see nothing wrong in this article, but some stages and items need more information. LeftyGreenMario (talk)

I see an edit war brewing. Marcelagus, BabyLuigiOnFire, and I are constantly reverting each other's edits. Can we agree on something? This has to stop. LeftyGreenMario (talk)

Let's just rewrite sentences with "players" instead of "the player" so we don't get this controversial issue. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)