Talk:Par: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Yoshilover76 (talk | contribs) (Created page with "==Deletion?== Is this really necessary? Do we have Home Run? Do we have Serve?") |
Ninelevendo (talk | contribs) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Deletion?== | ==Deletion?== | ||
Is this really necessary? Do we have [[Home Run]]? Do we have [[Serve]]? | Is this really necessary? Do we have [[Home Run]]? Do we have [[Serve]]? {{User:Yoshilover76/sig}} 16:38, 12 July 2014 (EDT) | ||
:We also have pages on [[Bogey|other]] [[Albatross|golf]] [[Eagle|terms]], so yeah, if we delete this, we have to delete the rest. Either that or create pages on Home-Run. {{User:Baby Luigi/sig}} 16:41, 12 July 2014 (EDT) | |||
::In my opinion, I think we should delete them cause honestly they aren't really relevant to the Mario series and are pretty much similar to the articles we had on dodgeballs and hockey sticks. On a more personal note, the Eagle, Albatross and Hole In One articles are full of images that are basically the same character animations with different words on them, which I find to be unnecessary. {{User:Tails777/sig}} | |||
:::I was considering making a Topspin article, but anyway, we have even more useless articles like [[Golf Club]]. I think that this is more useful, especially of you haven't played golf, but hey, we aren't a golf wiki. - {{User:Ninelevendo/sig}} 19:30, 12 July 2014 (EDT) | |||
::::I think the Golf Club article has some validity due to the different combinations and stats, but there's probably a better place for those anyways.--[[User:Vommack|Vommack]] ([[User talk:Vommack|talk]]) 20:06, 12 July 2014 (EDT) | |||
:::::You would have to mess with [http://www.mariowiki.com/Category:Golfing_Terms|this] and [http://www.mariowiki.com/Category:Game_Mechanics|this to a degree. - {{User:Ninelevendo/sig}} 21:59, 12 July 2014 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 20:59, July 12, 2014
Deletion?[edit]
Is this really necessary? Do we have Home Run? Do we have Serve? 
Yoshilover76
(talk · edits · work) 16:38, 12 July 2014 (EDT)
- We also have pages on other golf terms, so yeah, if we delete this, we have to delete the rest. Either that or create pages on Home-Run.
Ray Trace(T|C) 16:41, 12 July 2014 (EDT)
- In my opinion, I think we should delete them cause honestly they aren't really relevant to the Mario series and are pretty much similar to the articles we had on dodgeballs and hockey sticks. On a more personal note, the Eagle, Albatross and Hole In One articles are full of images that are basically the same character animations with different words on them, which I find to be unnecessary.
Tails777 Talk to me!
- I was considering making a Topspin article, but anyway, we have even more useless articles like Golf Club. I think that this is more useful, especially of you haven't played golf, but hey, we aren't a golf wiki. -
19:30, 12 July 2014 (EDT)
- I think the Golf Club article has some validity due to the different combinations and stats, but there's probably a better place for those anyways.--Vommack (talk) 20:06, 12 July 2014 (EDT)
- You would have to mess with [1] and [http://www.mariowiki.com/Category:Game_Mechanics%7Cthis to a degree. - 21:59, 12 July 2014 (EDT)
- You would have to mess with [1] and [http://www.mariowiki.com/Category:Game_Mechanics%7Cthis to a degree. -
- I think the Golf Club article has some validity due to the different combinations and stats, but there's probably a better place for those anyways.--Vommack (talk) 20:06, 12 July 2014 (EDT)
- I was considering making a Topspin article, but anyway, we have even more useless articles like Golf Club. I think that this is more useful, especially of you haven't played golf, but hey, we aren't a golf wiki. -
- In my opinion, I think we should delete them cause honestly they aren't really relevant to the Mario series and are pretty much similar to the articles we had on dodgeballs and hockey sticks. On a more personal note, the Eagle, Albatross and Hole In One articles are full of images that are basically the same character animations with different words on them, which I find to be unnecessary.
