Talk:Bloopurn: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
::Personally I think without the stats it should be. {{User|Yoshi876}} | ::Personally I think without the stats it should be. {{User|Yoshi876}} | ||
:::From what I can tell, it's not just the stats too. Off the top of my head I can tell it lacks information about how it spills stuff when attacked, what game it appears in and it's generally fairly vague about its attacks, all of which could count as lacking information. {{User|Icemario11}} | :::From what I can tell, it's not just the stats too. Off the top of my head I can tell it lacks information about how it spills stuff when attacked, what game it appears in and it's generally fairly vague about its attacks, all of which could count as lacking information. {{User|Icemario11}} | ||
::::I added some information to help with the prognosis of the page and looked at Icemario11's post to find out what to fix and what information to add. Not everything can be fixed yet. [[File:Yoshis Story Bobomb.png|35px]][[User: RandomDSplayer|RandomDS]][[User Talk: RandomDSplayer|player]][[File:Yoshis Story Bobomb.png|35px]] 15:17, 2 December 2013 (EST) | |||
== Really a Blooper? == | |||
The template Bloopers is on this page, but is this really a Blooper? [[File:DarkBowserBIS.png|35px]][[User:DarkBowser777|<span style="font-family:serif;color:darkblue">DarkBowser777</span>]]([[User talk:DarkBowser777|talk]])[[File:Dreamy Bowser idle.png|35px]] 19:41, 19 June 2017 (EDT) | |||
:It's clearly of a relation to Bloopers, even if not biologically, and contains Bloopers. Ergo, it should stay. - {{User|Doc von Schmeltwick}} 0:24, 23 June 2017 (CT) | |||
Latest revision as of 00:24, June 23, 2017
Should this page be deleted in 7 days, even if the enemy infobox is there? 
RandomDSplayer 21:30, 28 November 2013 (EST)
- This shouldn't be a new stub any more.
It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 14:59, 29 November 2013 (EST)
- Personally I think without the stats it should be. Yoshi876 (talk)
- From what I can tell, it's not just the stats too. Off the top of my head I can tell it lacks information about how it spills stuff when attacked, what game it appears in and it's generally fairly vague about its attacks, all of which could count as lacking information. Icemario11 (talk)
- Personally I think without the stats it should be. Yoshi876 (talk)
Really a Blooper?[edit]
The template Bloopers is on this page, but is this really a Blooper? 
DarkBowser777(talk)
19:41, 19 June 2017 (EDT)
- It's clearly of a relation to Bloopers, even if not biologically, and contains Bloopers. Ergo, it should stay. - Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 0:24, 23 June 2017 (CT)
