MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Mario Kart 7: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(50 intermediate revisions by 27 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]===
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]===
{{FANOMSTAT
{{FANOMFAIL
|nominated=14:10, 2 January 2013
|nominated=14:10, 2 January 2013
|passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last oppose by copying it from the history of the page.-->
|lastedit=19:20, 3 March 2013
|nosupport=true
}}
}}
==== Support ====
==== Support ====
#{{User|Electrical Bowser jr.}} Good detail, no red links... What more could you want? Anyway, most of the MK games are featured.
#{{User|Electrical Bowser jr.}} Good detail, no red links... What more could you want? Anyway, most of the MK games are featured.
#{{user|New Super Yoshi}}  
#{{user|New Super Yoshi}}
#{{user|Daisyluva99}}
#{{user|Quilava}}
#{{user|Cirdec}}
#{{User|Mariotime11}}
#{{User|SmartYoshi}}
#{{User|Hammer Boom}}
#{{User|MortonBoo99}}
#{{User|Yoshi876}}
#{{User|YoshiFan1200}}
#{{User|Hi1234}}
#{{User|SombreroGuy}}
#{{User|Yoshifan916}}


==== Oppose ====
==== Oppose ====
Line 13: Line 27:
#{{User|Mr.L1998}} Oh no. There is a construction template. You should get rid of it or this page will NEVER be a featured article!
#{{User|Mr.L1998}} Oh no. There is a construction template. You should get rid of it or this page will NEVER be a featured article!
#{{User|Toad's Pikmin Army}} The page can still have minor errors, and its not exactly perfect. Just because all other Mario Kart games are featured doesn't mean this qualifies. per all above.
#{{User|Toad's Pikmin Army}} The page can still have minor errors, and its not exactly perfect. Just because all other Mario Kart games are featured doesn't mean this qualifies. per all above.
#{{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} I've read the rival order and I can tell it's wrong. There are actually 2 set rivals that are there, instead of one. Don't believe me? Choose a racer battle mode and you'll see. I'm also sure that no one proofread this article too.
#{{User|King Pikante}} Per all.
#{{User|MrConcreteDonkey}} - Per all.


==== Removal of Opposes ====
==== Removal of Opposes ====
#{{User|Electrical Bowser jr.}} I removed it... and it is no longer under construction. NOW will ya support?
Everyone
#{{user|New Super Yoshi}}
 
#{{user|Mariobros1985}} Okay, I'm with NSY, it's clear of mistakes.
#{{User|Electrical Bowser jr.}} There's no more construction template, and the Empty Section part is being fixed.
#{{User|Yoshi876}} Per Electrical Bowser jr. but it now looks like the empty sections now have information.
#{{User|BowserJunior}} It no longer violates the policy.


==== Comments ====
==== Comments ====
Line 25: Line 44:


: Honestly, I doubt that said TPP is necessary and I'm still siding with the opposers that the chart doesn't really look complete. So until then, as Lindsay151 said in her undoing of said edit - unless all confirmed facts are in place, the construction template stays. --M. C. - "Mario Gals" Fan! [[User:MeritC|User Page]] | [[User_talk:MeritC|Talk Page]] 16:29, 3 January 2013 (EST)
: Honestly, I doubt that said TPP is necessary and I'm still siding with the opposers that the chart doesn't really look complete. So until then, as Lindsay151 said in her undoing of said edit - unless all confirmed facts are in place, the construction template stays. --M. C. - "Mario Gals" Fan! [[User:MeritC|User Page]] | [[User_talk:MeritC|Talk Page]] 16:29, 3 January 2013 (EST)
Electrical Bowser jr.'s right,I've read the article,and there doesn't seem to be anything wrong with it. {{User|Daisyluva99}}
Guys. Listen. The construction template... gone! Please... some sysop remove all these opposes!
{{User:Electrical Bowser jr./sig}}
@Henry Tucayo Clay:
How do I make it so it doesn't violate the policy? GUYS! ANSWER ME! It doesn't violate it anymore!
{{User:Electrical Bowser jr./sig}}
@Electrical Bowser jr. To make sure it doesn't violate the empty section policy all it needs is information in the parts that link to another article e.g. Beta elements, staff, gallery {{User|Yoshi876}}

Latest revision as of 10:58, September 14, 2016

Mario Kart 7

Mario Kart 7 was nominated for Featured Article status at 14:10, 2 January 2013.

Mario Kart 7 failed FA status requirements at 19:20, 3 March 2013, and can currently be renominated.


Support

  1. Electrical Bowser jr. (talk) Good detail, no red links... What more could you want? Anyway, most of the MK games are featured.
  2. New Super Yoshi (talk)
  3. Daisyluva99 (talk)
  4. Quilava (talk)
  5. Cirdec (talk)
  6. Mariotime11 (talk)
  7. SmartYoshi (talk)
  8. Hammer Boom (talk)
  9. MortonBoo99 (talk)
  10. Yoshi876 (talk)
  11. YoshiFan1200 (talk)
  12. Hi1234 (talk)
  13. SombreroGuy (talk)
  14. Yoshifan916 (talk)

Oppose

  1. MeritC (talk) Unfortunately, I'm going to have to oppose this as well; per New Super Yoshi.
  2. Mr.L1998 (talk) Oh no. There is a construction template. You should get rid of it or this page will NEVER be a featured article!
  3. Toad's Pikmin Army (talk) The page can still have minor errors, and its not exactly perfect. Just because all other Mario Kart games are featured doesn't mean this qualifies. per all above.
  4. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) I've read the rival order and I can tell it's wrong. There are actually 2 set rivals that are there, instead of one. Don't believe me? Choose a racer battle mode and you'll see. I'm also sure that no one proofread this article too.
  5. King Pikante (talk) Per all.
  6. MrConcreteDonkey (talk) - Per all.

Removal of Opposes

Everyone

  1. Electrical Bowser jr. (talk) There's no more construction template, and the Empty Section part is being fixed.
  2. Yoshi876 (talk) Per Electrical Bowser jr. but it now looks like the empty sections now have information.
  3. BowserJunior (talk) It no longer violates the policy.

Comments

Well, then, can you support my proposal to remove it?

Hi! I'm Electrical Bowser jr.!

Honestly, I doubt that said TPP is necessary and I'm still siding with the opposers that the chart doesn't really look complete. So until then, as Lindsay151 said in her undoing of said edit - unless all confirmed facts are in place, the construction template stays. --M. C. - "Mario Gals" Fan! User Page | Talk Page 16:29, 3 January 2013 (EST)

Electrical Bowser jr.'s right,I've read the article,and there doesn't seem to be anything wrong with it. Daisyluva99 (talk)

Guys. Listen. The construction template... gone! Please... some sysop remove all these opposes!

Hi! I'm Electrical Bowser jr.!

@Henry Tucayo Clay:

How do I make it so it doesn't violate the policy? GUYS! ANSWER ME! It doesn't violate it anymore!

Hi! I'm Electrical Bowser jr.!

@Electrical Bowser jr. To make sure it doesn't violate the empty section policy all it needs is information in the parts that link to another article e.g. Beta elements, staff, gallery Yoshi876 (talk)

Retrieved from "https://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=MarioWiki:Featured_articles/N1/Mario_Kart_7&oldid=2056649"