MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Megasparkle Goomba: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Time)
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]===
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]===
{{FANOMSTAT
{{FANOMFAIL
|nominated=18 November 2012
|nominated=11:28, 18 November 2012
|passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last oppose by copying it from the history of the page.-->
|lastedit=18:40, 18 November 2012
|nosupport=true
}}
}}
====Support====
====Support====
#{{User|Electrical Bowser jr.}} A very interesting, detailed article.
#{{User|Electrical Bowser jr.}} A very interesting, detailed article.
#{{User|Mariobros1985}} I am supporting it, but I'm worried it will fail because it is under construction, and there are several red links.
#{{User|Mariobros1985}}  


====Oppose====
====Oppose====
#{{User|Marshal Dan Troop}} Really the article with a construction template has been nominated you do know that articles with construction templates can't be featured right. Also this article while small has mistakes in it like this ''Eventually, the Goombas tire out. However, the corrupted one becomes infuriated at them. The regular Goombas leave the stage, leaving the corrupted Goomba alone. He is quickly defeated by Mario. This phase can be started immediately by using scissors on the Goombas when they are not combined.'' it's awkwardly worded and probably wrong.
#{{User|Bop1996}} Ridiculous. This article is riddled with mistakes, is nowhere near complete, and isn't even up to normal article standards, let alone featured article standards.
#{{User|MrConcreteDonkey}} &ndash; Per all.
#{{User|Hypnotoad}} Absolutely not, per the reasons above.


====Removal of Opposes====
====Removal of Opposes====

Latest revision as of 10:59, September 14, 2016

Megasparkle Goomba[edit]

Megasparkle Goomba was nominated for Featured Article status at 11:28, 18 November 2012.

Megasparkle Goomba failed FA status requirements at 18:40, 18 November 2012, and can currently be renominated.

Support[edit]

  1. Electrical Bowser jr. (talk) A very interesting, detailed article.
  2. Mariobros1985 (talk)

Oppose[edit]

  1. Marshal Dan Troop (talk) Really the article with a construction template has been nominated you do know that articles with construction templates can't be featured right. Also this article while small has mistakes in it like this Eventually, the Goombas tire out. However, the corrupted one becomes infuriated at them. The regular Goombas leave the stage, leaving the corrupted Goomba alone. He is quickly defeated by Mario. This phase can be started immediately by using scissors on the Goombas when they are not combined. it's awkwardly worded and probably wrong.
  2. Bop1996 (talk) Ridiculous. This article is riddled with mistakes, is nowhere near complete, and isn't even up to normal article standards, let alone featured article standards.
  3. MrConcreteDonkey (talk) – Per all.
  4. Hypnotoad (talk) Absolutely not, per the reasons above.

Removal of Opposes[edit]

Comments[edit]

We need to put the correct nomination time (because I don't really know how to do). World10 (talk)

Retrieved from "https://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=MarioWiki:Featured_articles/N1/Megasparkle_Goomba&oldid=2056677"