MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Mario Hoops 3-on-3: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]===
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]===
<div class="boilerplate metadata" id="image-needed" style="text-align: justify;-moz-border-radius:20px; background: #E9AB17; color:black; margin: .5em 2%; padding: 0 1em; border: 1px dotted orangered">
{{FANOMFAIL
The "'''{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}'''" article was nominated for Featured Article status at 14:56 14 October 2012
|nominated=14:56, 14 October 2012
</div>[[Category:FA nomination pages|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]
|lastedit=14:41, 13 December 2012
|nosupport=true
}}


==== Support ====
==== Support ====
Line 10: Line 12:
#{{User|SmartYoshi}}
#{{User|SmartYoshi}}
#{{User|Mariobros1985}}
#{{User|Mariobros1985}}
#{{User|Lucoshi}}


==== Oppose ====
==== Oppose ====

Latest revision as of 10:58, September 14, 2016

Mario Hoops 3-on-3[edit]


Support[edit]

  1. Yoshi K (talk) I was looking for articles that deserved to be FAs, so I looked at this article and said, "Wow." This article is very well-written, has no improvement tags, has a good lead, no red-links (the red stuff in the article is coloring), has a lot of info about the game, and has many good-quality images. I double-checked it for mistakes, and I still can't find anything wrong with it! I think this should be featured.
  2. World10 (talk)
  3. SmartYoshi (talk)
  4. Mariobros1985 (talk)
  5. Lucoshi (talk)

Oppose[edit]

  1. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) Needs better quality pictures and more pictures overall.
  2. Vommack (talk) Per all.
  3. DKPetey99 (talk) Per my comments below.

Removal of Opposes[edit]

Comments[edit]

I agree more images should be added. Also, I feel the items list is unorganized. Most games have a chart for images, and I think this one needs one, too. The character chart is also iffy, as the centering is off. I do agree that the information is extraordinary, however it's physical quality seems messy or not good enough. I'll see what I can do regarding changing the appearance. But for now I'm opposing. DKPetey99DKPetey99TCE