Talk:Dark matter: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
m (Mario jc moved page Talk:Dark Matter to Talk:Dark matter: Lowercase in-game) |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Dark Matter vs. Antimatter | == Dark Matter vs. Antimatter== | ||
Technically, Dark matter is an un-reactive material. Antimatter is the stuff that will blow up, destroy, demolish etc. matter. Should this be stated? {{User:Arceus79/sig}} 00:40, 24 March 2012 (EDT) | Technically, Dark matter is an un-reactive material. Antimatter is the stuff that will blow up, destroy, demolish etc. matter. Should this be stated? {{User:Arceus79/sig}} 00:40, 24 March 2012 (EDT) | ||
:I don't know of any instance where this can be really compared to what we know of in real life as "dark matter" in anything other than name. {{User:Bop1996/sig}} | |||
== Trivia == | |||
Do we really need that trivia? This is about a substance in the Mario series that is totally different from the theoretical Dark Matter other than the name. It explains a little too much about the non-Mario type, which is not what the article is about. If it's going to be kept at all, it should at least be reworded.<br> | |||
{{User:Ultimate Mr. L/sig}} 12:20, 15 December 2016 (EST) | |||
:I feel like just a wikipedia link on the name should be fine. {{User:Alex95/sig}} 12:30, 15 December 2016 (EST) |
Latest revision as of 05:24, February 14, 2019
Dark Matter vs. Antimatter[edit]
Technically, Dark matter is an un-reactive material. Antimatter is the stuff that will blow up, destroy, demolish etc. matter. Should this be stated? Arceus79 00:40, 24 March 2012 (EDT)
- I don't know of any instance where this can be really compared to what we know of in real life as "dark matter" in anything other than name. Bop1996 (Talk)
Trivia[edit]
Do we really need that trivia? This is about a substance in the Mario series that is totally different from the theoretical Dark Matter other than the name. It explains a little too much about the non-Mario type, which is not what the article is about. If it's going to be kept at all, it should at least be reworded.
(--) 12:20, 15 December 2016 (EST)