MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Donkey Kong Jungle Beat: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
YoshiPickle (talk | contribs) |
m (Porplemontage moved page MarioWiki:Featured Articles/N1/Donkey Kong Jungle Beat to MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Donkey Kong Jungle Beat: Fix) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
===''[[Donkey Kong Jungle Beat]]''=== | ===''[[Donkey Kong Jungle Beat]]''=== | ||
{{ | {{FANOMFAIL | ||
|nominated=02:59, 19 November 2011 | |nominated=02:59, 19 November 2011 | ||
| | |lastedit=18:17, 13 February 2012 | ||
|nosupport=false | |||
}} | }} | ||
==== Support ==== | ==== Support ==== | ||
| Line 21: | Line 22: | ||
Bop: What quality? Can you please specify? {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} | Bop: What quality? Can you please specify? {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} | ||
:Meaning that while nothing is technically ''wrong'' with the article, there isn't that stuffed-to-the-brim-with-info style about it like there is our other FAs. {{User|Bop1996}} | :Meaning that while nothing is technically ''wrong'' with the article, there isn't that stuffed-to-the-brim-with-info style about it like there is our other FAs. {{User|Bop1996}} | ||
::Like what, relatively? I mean, this article meets all the requirements. {{User|LeftyGreenMario}} | |||
Latest revision as of 10:58, September 14, 2016
Donkey Kong Jungle Beat[edit]
Support[edit]
- Toa 95 (talk) - I have been editing this page for a while now, and I think it's good enough for featured article status.
- Commander Code-8 (talk)
- JORDAN DEBONO (talk)
- M&L (talk)
Oppose[edit]
- Bop1996 (talk) It doesn't have a significant amount of poor grammar or missing content, but there isn't the same level of quality that shines through in our other featured articles.
- Spidey665 (talk) Per Bop. Same goes for a lot of similar pages.
- Skyward Yoshi (talk) I think this is at a standard of a good article. Per Bop.
Removal of Opposes[edit]
Comments[edit]
Bop: What quality? Can you please specify? BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)
- Meaning that while nothing is technically wrong with the article, there isn't that stuffed-to-the-brim-with-info style about it like there is our other FAs. Bop1996 (talk)
- Like what, relatively? I mean, this article meets all the requirements. LeftyGreenMario (talk)
