MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/King K. Rool: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Dr Javelin (talk | contribs) |
m (Porplemontage moved page MarioWiki:Featured Articles/Unfeature/N1/King K. Rool to MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/King K. Rool: Fix) |
||
(45 intermediate revisions by 23 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||4}}]]=== | ===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||4}}]]=== | ||
{{ | {{UNFANOMFAIL | ||
|nominated=21:30, 12 June 2011 | |nominated=21:30, 12 June 2011 | ||
| | |lastedit= 17:57, 31 January 2012 (EDT) | ||
}} | |nosupport=true}} | ||
==== Remove Featured Article Status ==== | ==== Remove Featured Article Status ==== | ||
#{{User|DKPetey99}} I know I didn't make this nomination, '''but''' the tense is not correct, it's written in the past tense. | #{{User|DKPetey99}} I know I didn't make this nomination, '''but''' the tense is not correct, it's written in the past tense. Also, most sections are missing images. King K. Rool also appeared in one Super Mario-Kun comic. Thus the history is incomplete, meaning it can't stay featured. | ||
#{{User|Thejfh1999}} It needs more images. | |||
==== Keep Featured Article Status ==== | ==== Keep Featured Article Status ==== | ||
#{{User|MrConcreteDonkey}}: Request for unfeaturing | #{{User|MrConcreteDonkey}}: Request for unfeaturing by original requester lacked any kind of reason. Now, the minor problems are fixed, so I don't see the problem. This article contains as much information as I believe it possibly can, and I'm sure others can agree with me. | ||
#{{User|UltraMario3000}} Per MCD. | #{{User|UltraMario3000}} Per MCD. | ||
#{{User|KoopaStrikerCharged}} I think that it should keep the status because sure it's written in the past tense, but anyone can fix it. In fact, I might even start fixing it myself. | #{{User|KoopaStrikerCharged}} I think that it should keep the status because sure it's written in the past tense, but anyone can fix it. In fact, I might even start fixing it myself. | ||
#{{User| | #{{User|Dr Javelin}} Fixed a couple of tenses. Looks good to me. | ||
#{{User| | #{{User|New Super Mario}} Per MCD | ||
#{{User|Stelios7}} Per MCD! :D | |||
#{{User|GEX}}Per MCD | |||
#{{User|Mario Bros.!}} Rewrite template GONE! I change my vote. | |||
#{{User|Jman98}} Per MCD | |||
#{{User|Supremo78}} All templates gone. I change my vote. | |||
#{{User|B.wilson}} Per MrConcreteDonkey. | |||
#{{User|Marwikedor}} Per all | |||
#{{User|Commander Code-8}} I don't see anything wrong with this article. Per all | |||
==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ==== | ==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ==== | ||
'''MrConcreteDonkey''' | |||
#{{User|DKPetey99}} Now there is reasons. | |||
'''KoopaStrikerCharged''' | |||
#{{User|DKPetey99}} All of the rest of the page is written in past tense. | |||
'''Dr Javelin''' | |||
#{{User|DKPetey99}} All tense isn't fixed. And no, it is not good yet. | |||
'''DKPetey99''' | |||
#{{User|MrConcreteDonkey}} - The tenses and other problems are fixed. Also, could you explain how it is in such a "horrible" shape. And please explain what issue of Super Mario-Kun he appeared in, and confirm it, because "I think" isn't enough. | |||
==== Comments ==== | ==== Comments ==== | ||
WTF? Well, the tense isn't consistent. I hope Superrewinder isn't a mindless user nominating this for no reason. {{User|LeftyGreenMario}} | WTF? Well, the tense isn't consistent. I hope Superrewinder isn't a mindless user nominating this for no reason. {{User|LeftyGreenMario}} | ||
:That user didn't vote too, so I have a feeling Superrewinder did nominate for no reason. {{user|Mario jc}} | |||
Well I have a reason and we can't just ignore the fact that the article is in horrible shape. {{User|DKPetey99}} | |||
:No, it's not in '''horrible''' shape. It's in great shape. {{User|MrConcreteDonkey}} | |||
I noticed that this article will be featured on August 20, 2011, and yet it's being requested to be unfeatured. Something doesn't seem right. {{User|M&SG}} | |||
@Pdjr9000, Uh.. I don't know where you've been, but any article can become unfeatured.. {{User|Supremo78}} | |||
:Any article can be unfeatured if it doesn't maintain the requirements needed to stay featured. {{User|M&SG}} |
Latest revision as of 10:59, September 14, 2016
King K. Rool[edit]
Remove Featured Article Status[edit]
- DKPetey99 (talk) I know I didn't make this nomination, but the tense is not correct, it's written in the past tense. Also, most sections are missing images. King K. Rool also appeared in one Super Mario-Kun comic. Thus the history is incomplete, meaning it can't stay featured.
- Thejfh1999 (talk) It needs more images.
Keep Featured Article Status[edit]
- MrConcreteDonkey (talk): Request for unfeaturing by original requester lacked any kind of reason. Now, the minor problems are fixed, so I don't see the problem. This article contains as much information as I believe it possibly can, and I'm sure others can agree with me.
- UltraMario3000 (talk) Per MCD.
- KoopaStrikerCharged (talk) I think that it should keep the status because sure it's written in the past tense, but anyone can fix it. In fact, I might even start fixing it myself.
- Dr Javelin (talk) Fixed a couple of tenses. Looks good to me.
- New Super Mario (talk) Per MCD
- Stelios7 (talk) Per MCD! :D
- GEX (talk)Per MCD
- Mario Bros.! (talk) Rewrite template GONE! I change my vote.
- Jman98 (talk) Per MCD
- Supremo78 (talk) All templates gone. I change my vote.
- B.wilson (talk) Per MrConcreteDonkey.
- Marwikedor (talk) Per all
- Commander Code-8 (talk) I don't see anything wrong with this article. Per all
Removal of Support/Oppose Votes[edit]
MrConcreteDonkey
KoopaStrikerCharged
Dr Javelin
DKPetey99
- MrConcreteDonkey (talk) - The tenses and other problems are fixed. Also, could you explain how it is in such a "horrible" shape. And please explain what issue of Super Mario-Kun he appeared in, and confirm it, because "I think" isn't enough.
Comments[edit]
WTF? Well, the tense isn't consistent. I hope Superrewinder isn't a mindless user nominating this for no reason. LeftyGreenMario (talk)
- That user didn't vote too, so I have a feeling Superrewinder did nominate for no reason. Mario jc (talk)
Well I have a reason and we can't just ignore the fact that the article is in horrible shape. DKPetey99 (talk)
- No, it's not in horrible shape. It's in great shape. MrConcreteDonkey (talk)
I noticed that this article will be featured on August 20, 2011, and yet it's being requested to be unfeatured. Something doesn't seem right. M&SG (talk)
@Pdjr9000, Uh.. I don't know where you've been, but any article can become unfeatured.. Supremo78 (talk)