MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Iggy Koopa: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(12 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]===
===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]===
{{FANOMSTAT
{{FANOMFAIL
|nominated= 16:54, April 2nd, 2011 (GMT)
|nominated= 16:54, April 2nd, 2011 (GMT)
|passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last oppose by copying it from the history of the page.-->
|lastedit=16:54, July 2nd, 2011 (GMT)
|nosupport=true
}}
}}
--[[User:Darkstar51|Darkstar51]] 16:30, 5 June 2011 (EDT)==== Support ====
==== Support ====
  Iggy is my favorite koopaling, besides Larry! C'mon Iggy is preety nice! right? *sigh* IGGY! IGGY! IGGY!
#--{{User|Darkstar51}} Iggy is my favorite koopaling, besides Larry! C'mon Iggy is preety nice! right? *sigh* IGGY! IGGY! IGGY!


==== Oppose ====
==== Oppose ====
Line 18: Line 19:
#{{User|Byllant}} - It's easy to know why this guy nominate this article, many sections are short and need to be written properly.
#{{User|Byllant}} - It's easy to know why this guy nominate this article, many sections are short and need to be written properly.
#{{User|Mario Bros.!}} This has a stub.
#{{User|Mario Bros.!}} This has a stub.
#{{User|UltraMario3000}} Per all.


==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ====
==== Removal of Oppose Votes ====
=====Mario Bros.!=====
#{{User|DKPetey99}} How is the article in great condition, must give a reason!


==== Comments ====
==== Comments ====

Latest revision as of 10:58, September 14, 2016

Iggy Koopa[edit]

Support[edit]

  1. --Darkstar51 (talk) Iggy is my favorite koopaling, besides Larry! C'mon Iggy is preety nice! right? *sigh* IGGY! IGGY! IGGY!

Oppose[edit]

  1. Nicke8 (talk) Per LeftyGreenMario's comments
  2. DKPetey99 (talk) Not the best this wiki has to offer. It isn't written in the correct tense and some sections such as this one should be section stubs.
  3. Fawfulfury65 (talk) Not written in the correct tense.
  4. Mario4Ever (talk)Iggykoopa, did you read the rules? Articles with any sort of improvement tag(s) on them can't be nominated. Per LGM's comments.
  5. LeftyGreenMario (talk) This was nominated before the improvement tag showed up. Even though the article is now in the present tense, some sections, like the comic section, needs expansion. You will see what sections need more information.
  6. Catboy41 (talk) It needs more info on the comics.
  7. Superfiremario (talk) Per LGM comments
  8. Byllant (talk) - It's easy to know why this guy nominate this article, many sections are short and need to be written properly.
  9. Mario Bros.! (talk) This has a stub.
  10. UltraMario3000 (talk) Per all.

Removal of Oppose Votes[edit]

Comments[edit]

The whole article is not in the present tense. LeftyGreenMario (talk)

Im sorry your going to have to explain to me what that means im pretty poor with Grammar Iggykoopa (talk)

For instance, some parts of the article is "Iggy...was...", while it should be "Iggy...is...". "Had" should be "has". Regular verbs like "kidnapped" should be "kidnapped" unless it is "has kidnapped". LeftyGreenMario (talk)

@DKPetey99 i don't see why doing this violates the rules of the wiki of the featured article and yes i am a fan so what and we have Kiddy Kong featured and he is just one of the Kongs does that mean we should Feature all the kongs Iggykoopa (talk)

Mario4Ever: I added the template AFTER the article was nominated, so there is no way the original nominator knew it existed when he nominated it. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)

@Iggykoopa, look what you said here! Please don't be hypocritical. DKPetey99 (talk)
Do I really have to repeat myself :/ BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)