MediaWiki talk:Sitenotice: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
(→Revival: new section) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
No, they '''aren't'''. I changed the date to February 9th. {{User:Blitzwing/sig}} | No, they '''aren't'''. I changed the date to February 9th. {{User:Blitzwing/sig}} | ||
== Revival == | |||
Since there are no nore ads, can we bring this back?--{{User|Knife}} 13:55, 5 March 2011 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 14:55, March 5, 2011
Should a link to the chatroom be included as well? Template:Color-link-pipedayoshi TC@ 
22:04, 18 October 2006 (EDT)
MKDS
I don't mean to be a wet blanket but... I don't think you should change the sitenotice for the MKDS tourney. I thought that was a personal, not a wiki thing? Huh?Knife (talk)
- It's only until Sunday, then I'm switching back to the featured article notice. We need at least one more player, or the tournament's sunk. And, to be honest...I haven't been taking care of it well. Just bear with me for three days. Wa
TC@Y 00:39, 29 December 2006 (EST)
Makes sense. Could you add a bit more though, like Happy Holidays or something? That would be okay then.Knife (talk)
Stubs
Should we perhaps remind others not to create stub articles?Knife (talk) 14:36, 13 August 2007 (EDT)
Shroom Date
"The next 'Shroom articles are due February 5th.
No, they aren't. I changed the date to February 9th. Blitzwing (talk · gnome work)
Revival
Since there are no nore ads, can we bring this back?--Knife (talk) 13:55, 5 March 2011 (EST)
