MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Honeyhive Galaxy: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Fawfulfury65 (talk | contribs) m (→Remove Featured Article Status: Crap that's right) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
==== Comments ==== | ==== Comments ==== | ||
Fawfulfury, you're supposed to add a reason for unfeature nominations. If this is a feature nomination, yeah, it's allowed. {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} | Fawfulfury, you're supposed to add a reason for unfeature nominations. If this is a feature nomination, yeah, it's allowed. {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} | ||
Wait, how come this article does not show up on [[MarioWiki:Featured Articles|this]] page under "FAs Proposed for Unfeaturing"? {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} | |||
Revision as of 20:49, December 2, 2010
Honeyhive Galaxy
Remove Featured Article Status
- Bowser's luma (talk) It has the "wrong verb tense" template on it, and that is against the rules for a FA.
- Fawfulfury65 (talk) Has a tense template.
- BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) Although I have indeed fixed all of the tense errors, the excessive use of demonstratives ("there are, there is") is a major problem. What it does is that bores the reader if used too much. Also, there are a bunch of capitalization errors (I'm not sure if mandibug is supposed to be lower-cased, and shouldn't the names of the planets also be lower-cased?) that I stumbled across and did my best to correct them, but there's still quite a notorious amount of them. Bottom line: proof-read articles before you feature them!
Keep Featured Article Status
Removal of Support/Oppose Votes
Comments
Fawfulfury, you're supposed to add a reason for unfeature nominations. If this is a feature nomination, yeah, it's allowed. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)
Wait, how come this article does not show up on this page under "FAs Proposed for Unfeaturing"? BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)
