Talk:WarioWare: Twisted!: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Time Turner (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
:Well, both have pros and cons, the first one looks better, but the intro paragraph is very weak. I would say either is fine. --{{User:Tucayo/sig}} 18:13, 6 August 2010 (UTC) | :Well, both have pros and cons, the first one looks better, but the intro paragraph is very weak. I would say either is fine. --{{User:Tucayo/sig}} 18:13, 6 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
::But we can't have both. Either we choose my format, or we choose Mr bones' format. {{User:Reversinator/sig}} | ::But we can't have both. Either we choose my format, or we choose Mr bones' format. {{User:Reversinator/sig}} | ||
:::There are many more inconsistencies in terms of article forms. I think the microgame articles are one of the smaller issues. As long as it is well written, it's fine at this point in my opinion. --[[User:Grandy02|Grandy02]] 14:47, 1 December 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 10:47, December 1, 2010
QQ (Quick Question): Didn't Kiby: Tilt n' Tumble use a motion sensor, too? Para Yoshi Wahoo!
09:14, 30 October 2006 (EST)
- Oh, no you're right, K:Tn'T was GBC game.
Para Yoshi Wahoo!
09:15, 30 October 2006 (EST)
Last "Game"
The list of games in the "Games" section of WarioWare: Twisted! you have is not complete. There is one more game available in WWT. What it is, I'm not sure, since I haven't unlocked it, but the "?" circle is there after PYORO R, meaning that there is another. Deoxys ruelz! 18:51, 20 February 2008 (EST)
Microgame Concistency
![]() |
This talk page or section has a conflict or question that needs to be answered. Please try to help and resolve the issue by leaving a comment. |
Me and Mr bones have been creating articles on the microgames, but in a different form. Compare What's the Point? to Self-Defense, for example. Which format should we stick with? Hello, I'm Time Turner.
- Well, both have pros and cons, the first one looks better, but the intro paragraph is very weak. I would say either is fine. --
™ The 'Shroom 18:13, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
- But we can't have both. Either we choose my format, or we choose Mr bones' format. Hello, I'm Time Turner.
- There are many more inconsistencies in terms of article forms. I think the microgame articles are one of the smaller issues. As long as it is well written, it's fine at this point in my opinion. --Grandy02 14:47, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
- But we can't have both. Either we choose my format, or we choose Mr bones' format. Hello, I'm Time Turner.