Talk:WarioWare: Twisted!
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the WarioWare: Twisted! article. It is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. Comments such as "Mario is my favorite character" are not allowed and will be removed on sight. Please use the Mario Boards or our Discord server to talk about WarioWare: Twisted!.
If you do have a question or comment about the article, please remember to sign your edit with ~~~~.
This is a featured article!
It represents the best of the best that the Super Mario Wiki has produced. If there are any edits that would improve the article's quality even further, make them. | |
| Edit the article · Add to discussion (new section) · Featured articles page | 
|
QQ (Quick Question): Didn't Kiby: Tilt n' Tumble use a motion sensor, too? 
Para Yoshi Wahoo! 09:14, 30 October 2006 (EST)
- Oh, no you're right, K:Tn'T was GBC game.
Para Yoshi Wahoo! 09:15, 30 October 2006 (EST)
Last "Game"[edit]
The list of games in the "Games" section of WarioWare: Twisted! you have is not complete. There is one more game available in WWT. What it is, I'm not sure, since I haven't unlocked it, but the "?" circle is there after PYORO R, meaning that there is another. Deoxys ruelz! 18:51, 20 February 2008 (EST)
Microgame Concistency[edit]
Me and Mr bones have been creating articles on the microgames, but in a different form. Compare What's the Point? to Self-Defense, for example. Which format should we stick with? Hello, I'm Time Turner.
- Well, both have pros and cons, the first one looks better, but the intro paragraph is very weak. I would say either is fine. --
™ The 'Shroom 18:13, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
- But we can't have both. Either we choose my format, or we choose Mr bones' format. Hello, I'm Time Turner.
- There are many more inconsistencies in terms of article forms. I think the microgame articles are one of the smaller issues. As long as it is well written, it's fine at this point in my opinion. --Grandy02 14:47, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
- I disagree: inconsistencies should be avoided no matter what articles we're talking about. I'd say go with the "What's the Point?" style, since it provides the info in a more straightforward way, and the introduction can sometimes be fleshed out in cases where there's something extra to mention other than the gameplay (such as the souvenir mentioned on the Self-Defense page). - Walkazo 12:37, 14 June 2011 (EDT)
- There are many more inconsistencies in terms of article forms. I think the microgame articles are one of the smaller issues. As long as it is well written, it's fine at this point in my opinion. --Grandy02 14:47, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
- But we can't have both. Either we choose my format, or we choose Mr bones' format. Hello, I'm Time Turner.
Can[edit]
someone improve some articles? Work with me on my page. Unshy Guy (talk) 08:13, 14 November 2013 (EST)
