Talk:Main Page/Archive 5: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Maybe, personally I never saw the point on having information on the companies and gaming systems. -- [[User: Sir Grodus|Sir Grodus]] | Maybe, personally I never saw the point on having information on the companies and gaming systems. -- [[User: Sir Grodus|Sir Grodus]] | ||
== DKR or DKRDS? == | == Canonical: DKR or DKRDS? == | ||
I took notice some individuals question the canonancy of DKR + DKRDS and it would require removal of the BK artiles we have worked hard of making. Well unless an official source is stated that the N64 version is non-canon, i beleive the Banjo articles and Conker articles should stay. Agree? -- {{user:WarioLoaf/sig}} 15:49, 2 February 2007 (EST) | I took notice some individuals question the canonancy of DKR + DKRDS and it would require removal of the BK artiles we have worked hard of making. Well unless an official source is stated that the N64 version is non-canon, i beleive the Banjo articles and Conker articles should stay. Agree? -- {{user:WarioLoaf/sig}} 15:49, 2 February 2007 (EST) | ||
Check out the latest at [[MarioWiki talk:Importance Policy]]. The issue is that, not to my knowledge before, the DS version is a complete remake: it's almost all the same, with better graphics and some new unlockables. Of course, the DS version replaces Banjo and Conker with Tiny and Dixie, now that Rare is separate from Nintendo. If DKRDS is more canonical, Banjo & Conker get the boot from this wiki. Opinions? {{User:Wayoshi/sig}} 15:54, 2 February 2007 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 15:54, February 2, 2007
4000 Articles
Unfortunately, I could not identify the 4000th article itself. I'll find the 5000th for sure. :) Wa 
TC@Y 14:11, 28 January 2007 (EST)
- Knife has informed me it's Balloon Bully.
— The preceding unsigned comment was added by Wayoshi (talk).
YAY! I made the 4000th! 
3D, wahoo!
'Shroom Deadline
The second issue of the 'Shroom is set to come out this Saturday. I post the message here in hopes that people will notice before I add a section in their talk pages tomorrow. Wa TC@Y 13:36, 30 January 2007 (EST)
Microsoft
Now that Banjo and Conker are part of the wiki, shouldnt we include some Microsoft information? - User: Ultimatetoad
Maybe, personally I never saw the point on having information on the companies and gaming systems. -- Sir Grodus
Canonical: DKR or DKRDS?
I took notice some individuals question the canonancy of DKR + DKRDS and it would require removal of the BK artiles we have worked hard of making. Well unless an official source is stated that the N64 version is non-canon, i beleive the Banjo articles and Conker articles should stay. Agree? -- WarioLoaf (talk) 15:49, 2 February 2007 (EST)
Check out the latest at MarioWiki talk:Importance Policy. The issue is that, not to my knowledge before, the DS version is a complete remake: it's almost all the same, with better graphics and some new unlockables. Of course, the DS version replaces Banjo and Conker with Tiny and Dixie, now that Rare is separate from Nintendo. If DKRDS is more canonical, Banjo & Conker get the boot from this wiki. Opinions? Wa TC@Y 15:54, 2 February 2007 (EST)
