MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Kiddy Kong

Kiddy Kong

Support

1. Fawfulfury65 (talk) Good article, lots of images, and a great amount of info.
2. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)

Oppose

1. BluePikminKong497 (talk) Short, needs more images, and the comics sections could be expanded.
2. NARCE (talk)
3. KS3 (talk) Physical Description needs expansion.

Removal of Opposes

BluePikminKong497

1. Fawfulfury65 (talk) Long enough for FA standards and has all info that can be added in the comics section. There is definitely enough images, one in almost every section. There is even a gallery for additional images that I couldn't fit into the article.

NARCE

1. Fawfulfury65 (talk) I have added all the sources this article needs. Everything else can be found right in the game.
2. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) Having no reason is definitely not a reason to oppose

Comments

Lacks any form of references. Looking at the requirements for being a featured article on this Wiki: "…be sourced with all available sources and Mario-related appearances." Clearly, the lack of references tells us that this article cannot be featured quality by the standards put in place and should be failed if this is not fixed. - NARCE 03:15, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

You don't know what references are do you? Gamefreak75 (talk)

Well, after having edited Wikipedia significantly, and how every single featured article uses sources - ie references - I think I have a little more knowledge than you do if you believe that this article has references.

But humour me - what is a reference? - NARCE 05:58, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Look here. Then ask questions later. Sheesh. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)

@BluePikminKong497: Did you even look at the article? It has a lot of images, is not near being short - it's almost as long as Bramble Scramble, and all the info about his appearances in that comic are there. Fawfulfury65 (talk)

@KS3: I don't think there's really anymore to add there... Fawfulfury65 (talk)