Template talk:PipePlaza: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Articles Under Construction)
 
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Articles Under Construction==
==Articles Under Construction==
IMO it doesn't make much sense to list articles under construction here. I mean, most of those articles have the construction tag because a user is working on them, i.e. they don't need the attention of other users. I propose to put articles with the rewrite tag here instead (or something else, if someone can come up with a better idea). {{User:Time Q/sig}} 17:45, 22 August 2009 (EDT)
IMO it doesn't make much sense to list articles under construction here. I mean, most of those articles have the construction tag because a user is working on them, i.e. they don't need the attention of other users. I propose to put articles with the rewrite tag here instead (or something else, if someone can come up with a better idea). {{User:Time Q/sig}} 17:45, 22 August 2009 (EDT)
:I agree with Time Q. {{User:Super Mario Bros./sig}} 17:47, 22 August 2009 (EDT)
:Many of the "articles under construction" haven't been edited in some time, so I think they've been abandoned. --{{User:Porplemontage/sig}} 17:49, 22 August 2009 (EDT)
::That's right, but the construction tag has a different purpose... I still think "articles to be rewritten" would fit better here. {{User:Time Q/sig}} 17:56, 22 August 2009 (EDT)
:::I'd like you to actually pick specific articles to feature instead of relying on DPL; current collaborations could be put up.  --{{User:Porplemontage/sig}} 18:06, 22 August 2009 (EDT)
== {{Tem|Announcement}} ==
The Pipe Plaza is basically the place where we put our announcements, so now that we have a Pipe Plaza template, I don't think we should have {{Tem|Announcement}} anymore. {{User:Super Mario Bros./sig}} 17:50, 22 August 2009 (EDT)
:We will continue to have it for bigger news that Sitenotice would otherwise have been used for. --{{User:Porplemontage/sig}} 18:03, 22 August 2009 (EDT)
==Talk Pages With Questions?==
Cant that be done with DPL?  --{{User:Tucayo/sig}} 19:00, 10 January 2010 (EST)
:Yes, but I don't know how to use DPL. {{User:Reversinator/sig}}

Latest revision as of 16:52, February 3, 2010

Articles Under Construction[edit]

IMO it doesn't make much sense to list articles under construction here. I mean, most of those articles have the construction tag because a user is working on them, i.e. they don't need the attention of other users. I propose to put articles with the rewrite tag here instead (or something else, if someone can come up with a better idea). Time Questions 17:45, 22 August 2009 (EDT)

I agree with Time Q. · SMB (Talk) · 17:47, 22 August 2009 (EDT)
Many of the "articles under construction" haven't been edited in some time, so I think they've been abandoned. --Steve (talk) Get Firefox 17:49, 22 August 2009 (EDT)
That's right, but the construction tag has a different purpose... I still think "articles to be rewritten" would fit better here. Time Questions 17:56, 22 August 2009 (EDT)
I'd like you to actually pick specific articles to feature instead of relying on DPL; current collaborations could be put up. --Steve (talk) Get Firefox 18:06, 22 August 2009 (EDT)

{{Announcement}}[edit]

The Pipe Plaza is basically the place where we put our announcements, so now that we have a Pipe Plaza template, I don't think we should have {{Announcement}} anymore. · SMB (Talk) · 17:50, 22 August 2009 (EDT)

We will continue to have it for bigger news that Sitenotice would otherwise have been used for. --Steve (talk) Get Firefox 18:03, 22 August 2009 (EDT)

Talk Pages With Questions?[edit]

Cant that be done with DPL? --TucayoSig.png The 'Shroom 19:00, 10 January 2010 (EST)

Yes, but I don't know how to use DPL. Hello, I'm Time Turner.