Talk:Puff (species): Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Necessity?) |
m (Text replacement - "^([A-Za-z0-9][^:])" to "==(First topic)== $1") |
||
| (17 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==(First topic)== | |||
Is this page needed, when we also have [[Ruff Puff]] already? All family members are listed there as well and they are labelled as Ruff Puff sub-species. - {{User:Edofenrir/sig}} 13:20, 26 September 2009 (EDT) | Is this page needed, when we also have [[Ruff Puff]] already? All family members are listed there as well and they are labelled as Ruff Puff sub-species. - {{User:Edofenrir/sig}} 13:20, 26 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
:Nope, just a wasted space. And also reac the trivia, WTF?--{{User:Gamefreak75/Sig}} | |||
== Delete Puff (species) == | |||
{{Settled TPP}} | |||
{{Proposal outcome|passed|9-0|Delete}} | |||
There's no need for this page considering [[Ruff Puff]]s are obviously the "primary" species, making this, essentially, a hypothetical parent species. | |||
'''Proposer:''' {{User|Binarystep}}<br> | |||
'''Deadline:''' May 29, 2015, 23:59 GMT | |||
===Support=== | |||
#{{User|Binarystep}} Per proposal. | |||
#{{User|Magikrazy}} What's even the point in keeping it? | |||
#{{User|ShyGuy8}} Per Proposal. | |||
#{{User|Burningdragon25}} That is a must go for this article! Per all! | |||
#{{User|Lumastar}} This is a thing? | |||
#{{User|Mario}} Yes, this is a hypothetical parent species. No need to create a redundant article when the species is not ''that'' expansive and we have the root species. | |||
#{{User|Walkazo}} - Per all. These umbrella species pages in general bug me, seeing as they're actually talking about ''multiple'' species, but that's a whole other kettle of fish... | |||
#{{User|Baby Luigi}} Per Mario and Walkazo | |||
#{{User|LudwigVon}} Per all. | |||
===Oppose=== | |||
===Comments=== | |||
Latest revision as of 13:49, March 29, 2025
(First topic)[edit]
Is this page needed, when we also have Ruff Puff already? All family members are listed there as well and they are labelled as Ruff Puff sub-species. - 
Gabumon(talk) 13:20, 26 September 2009 (EDT)
Delete Puff (species)[edit]
|
This talk page proposal has already been settled. Please do not edit this section or its subsections. If you wish to discuss the article, please do so in a new section below the proposal. |
Delete 9-0
There's no need for this page considering Ruff Puffs are obviously the "primary" species, making this, essentially, a hypothetical parent species.
Proposer: Binarystep (talk)
Deadline: May 29, 2015, 23:59 GMT
Support[edit]
- Binarystep (talk) Per proposal.
- Magikrazy (talk) What's even the point in keeping it?
- ShyGuy8 (talk) Per Proposal.
- Burningdragon25 (talk) That is a must go for this article! Per all!
- Lumastar (talk) This is a thing?
- Mario (talk) Yes, this is a hypothetical parent species. No need to create a redundant article when the species is not that expansive and we have the root species.
- Walkazo (talk) - Per all. These umbrella species pages in general bug me, seeing as they're actually talking about multiple species, but that's a whole other kettle of fish...
- Baby Luigi (talk) Per Mario and Walkazo
- LudwigVon (talk) Per all.
