Talk:Puff (species)

Is this page needed, when we also have Ruff Puff already? All family members are listed there as well and they are labelled as Ruff Puff sub-species. - Gabumon^(talk) 13:20, 26 September 2009 (EDT)

Nope, just a wasted space. And also reac the trivia, WTF?--FREAK ~Game Freak~ OUT!

Delete Puff (species)

This talk page proposal has already been settled. Please do not edit any of the sections in the proposal. If you wish to discuss the article, do so in a new header below the proposal.

Delete 9-0

There's no need for this page considering Ruff Puffs are obviously the "primary" species, making this, essentially, a hypothetical parent species.

Proposer: Binarystep (talk)
Deadline: May 29, 2015, 23:59 GMT

Support

1. Binarystep (talk) Per proposal.
2. Magikrazy (talk) What's even the point in keeping it?
3. ShyGuy8 (talk) Per Proposal.
4. Burningdragon25 (talk) That is a must go for this article! Per all!
5. Lumastar (talk) This is a thing?
6. Mario (talk) Yes, this is a hypothetical parent species. No need to create a redundant article when the species is not that expansive and we have the root species.
7. Walkazo (talk) - Per all. These umbrella species pages in general bug me, seeing as they're actually talking about multiple species, but that's a whole other kettle of fish...
8. Baby Luigi (talk) Per Mario and Walkazo
9. LudwigVon (talk) Per all.