Talk:Double Item Box: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
m (Text replacement - "^([A-Za-z0-9][^:])" to "==(First topic)== $1") |
||
| (9 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==(First topic)== | |||
I think this should be merged into the ordinary [[Item Box]] page. [[User:Yoshi Time|Yoshi Time]] 15:20, 8 April 2007 (EDT) | I think this should be merged into the ordinary [[Item Box]] page. [[User:Yoshi Time|Yoshi Time]] 15:20, 8 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
==Merge [[Double Item Box]] into [[Item Box]]== | ==Merge [[Double Item Box]] into [[Item Box]]== | ||
{{TPP}} | {{Settled TPP}} | ||
{{Proposal outcome|green|merge 6-0}} | |||
I read both of them, they are the same function, just that there are 2 of them. Double Item Box is short and Item Box is not short, so I propose that we merge them. | I read both of them, they are the same function, just that there are 2 of them. Double Item Box is short and Item Box is not short, so I propose that we merge them. | ||
| Line 8: | Line 10: | ||
'''Deadline:''' 17 February 2010, 17:00 | '''Deadline:''' 17 February 2010, 17:00 | ||
{{fake heading|3|Merge Them}} | |||
#{{User|Red Shell 68066vr}} | #{{User|Red Shell 68066vr}} | ||
#{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} I see no reason why not to merge them. The double item box article is super duper short. I'm surprised it's not a stub, but if it is, then it can't be expanded since it appeared only in one game. | #{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} I see no reason why not to merge them. The double item box article is super duper short. I'm surprised it's not a stub, but if it is, then it can't be expanded since it appeared only in one game. | ||
#{{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} - What's so special about a double item box besides appearance and giving the driving character an item? Tell me. That's why I support. | #{{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} - What's so special about a double item box besides appearance and giving the driving character an item? Tell me. That's why I support. | ||
#{{User|Walkazo}} - Per all. | |||
#{{User|Gamefreak75}} Per all. | |||
#{{user|Coincollector}} - Whoa, it's really short and not a stub 0o Per all. | |||
{{fake heading|3|Don't Merge Them}} | |||
{{fake heading|3|Comments}} | |||
Latest revision as of 12:23, March 29, 2025
(First topic)[edit]
I think this should be merged into the ordinary Item Box page. Yoshi Time 15:20, 8 April 2007 (EDT)
Merge Double Item Box into Item Box[edit]
|
This talk page proposal has already been settled. Please do not edit this section or its subsections. If you wish to discuss the article, please do so in a new section below the proposal. |
merge 6-0
I read both of them, they are the same function, just that there are 2 of them. Double Item Box is short and Item Box is not short, so I propose that we merge them.
Proposer: Red Shell 68066vr (talk)
Deadline: 17 February 2010, 17:00
Merge Them
- Red Shell 68066vr (talk)
- LeftyGreenMario (talk) I see no reason why not to merge them. The double item box article is super duper short. I'm surprised it's not a stub, but if it is, then it can't be expanded since it appeared only in one game.
- BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) - What's so special about a double item box besides appearance and giving the driving character an item? Tell me. That's why I support.
- Walkazo (talk) - Per all.
- Gamefreak75 (talk) Per all.
- Coincollector (talk) - Whoa, it's really short and not a stub 0o Per all.
Don't Merge Them
Comments
