Talk:All-Around: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with "Are the characters listed on this page considered "All-Around" for '''every''' game they're in? I'd bet dollars to donuts at least one character on this page is something other than All-Around in some game or another. ~~~~") |
Power Flotzo (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==(First topic)== | |||
Are the characters listed on this page considered "All-Around" for '''every''' game they're in? I'd bet dollars to donuts at least one character on this page is something other than All-Around in some game or another. [[User:Shadow2|Shadow2]] ([[User talk:Shadow2|talk]]) 17:23, November 9, 2024 (EST) | Are the characters listed on this page considered "All-Around" for '''every''' game they're in? I'd bet dollars to donuts at least one character on this page is something other than All-Around in some game or another. [[User:Shadow2|Shadow2]] ([[User talk:Shadow2|talk]]) 17:23, November 9, 2024 (EST) | ||
:I'm honestly wondering why this page even exists. And yeah, there are characters that aren't always All-Around, such as Daisy and Birdo (as mentioned in the article's opening paragraph). [[User:Technetium|Technetium]] ([[User talk:Technetium|talk]]) 17:28, November 9, 2024 (EST) | |||
::It makes a kind of sense. "Characters associated with being neutral in games where neutral is a class" isn't far fetched. It does sound like it's more of a category than a workable article. [[User:Salmancer|Salmancer]] ([[User talk:Salmancer|talk]]) 17:44, November 9, 2024 (EST) | |||
::Actually, no. If it were formatted something like [[Fire (element)]] or [[Poison (status effect)]] (sectioning on a per game basis, grouping in concepts that are similar to the class), it would be way better. I could see All Round, Speed, and Power working in exactly this way. It's the ones that don't line up between games that cause the headache. [[User:Salmancer|Salmancer]] ([[User talk:Salmancer|talk]]) 18:04, November 9, 2024 (EST) | |||
==Improvements?== | |||
Recently I did a bit of a revamp on this page and I'm now looking for feedback. My hope is to get this page to an acceptable level before moving on to making pages for the other types. So, what do you guys think? {{User:LadySophie17/sig}} 12:16, March 5, 2025 (EST) | |||
Latest revision as of 00:15, March 23, 2025
(First topic)[edit]
Are the characters listed on this page considered "All-Around" for every game they're in? I'd bet dollars to donuts at least one character on this page is something other than All-Around in some game or another. Shadow2 (talk) 17:23, November 9, 2024 (EST)
- I'm honestly wondering why this page even exists. And yeah, there are characters that aren't always All-Around, such as Daisy and Birdo (as mentioned in the article's opening paragraph). Technetium (talk) 17:28, November 9, 2024 (EST)
- It makes a kind of sense. "Characters associated with being neutral in games where neutral is a class" isn't far fetched. It does sound like it's more of a category than a workable article. Salmancer (talk) 17:44, November 9, 2024 (EST)
- Actually, no. If it were formatted something like Fire (element) or Poison (status effect) (sectioning on a per game basis, grouping in concepts that are similar to the class), it would be way better. I could see All Round, Speed, and Power working in exactly this way. It's the ones that don't line up between games that cause the headache. Salmancer (talk) 18:04, November 9, 2024 (EST)
Improvements?[edit]
Recently I did a bit of a revamp on this page and I'm now looking for feedback. My hope is to get this page to an acceptable level before moving on to making pages for the other types. So, what do you guys think? — Lady Sophie 
(T|C) 12:16, March 5, 2025 (EST)
