MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Diddy Kong Racing: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Porplemontage moved page MarioWiki:Featured Articles/Archive/N1/Diddy Kong Racing to MarioWiki:Featured articles/Archive/N1/Diddy Kong Racing: Fix) |
m (Text replacement - "{{[Ff]a-archive" to "{{FA archive notice") |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
{{ | {{FA archive notice|nominated=16:07, 13 October 2009 (EDT)|passed=23:51, 25 October 2009 (EDT)}} | ||
===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]=== | ===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]=== | ||
==== Support ==== | ==== Support ==== | ||
| Line 16: | Line 15: | ||
==== Comments ==== | ==== Comments ==== | ||
Just so everyone knows, I am improving the stats section so... yeah you know what I mean.{{User|Fawfulfury65}} | Just so everyone knows, I am improving the stats section so... yeah you know what I mean.{{User|Fawfulfury65}} | ||
| Line 25: | Line 23: | ||
:OK, you added enough images for me {{User|Marioguy1}} | :OK, you added enough images for me {{User|Marioguy1}} | ||
::Funny how you wrote that comment just while I added two more Images to the article oO - {{User|Edofenrir}} | ::Funny how you wrote that comment just while I added two more Images to the article oO - {{User|Edofenrir}} | ||
Latest revision as of 16:41, May 31, 2024
This is an archive of a successful featured article nomination. If this page is unprotected, do not modify its contents, as it is an archive of past discussions.
Diddy Kong Racing was nominated to be a featured article at 16:07, 13 October 2009 (EDT) and passed at 22:51, 1 November 2009.
Diddy Kong Racing
Support
- Fawfulfury65 (talk)- I've worked hard on this and now I believe it is FA worthy!
- DiddyKing (talk)- It looks fantastic after all your work! It definitely deserves to be featured.
- Ratfink43 (talk) I agree!! It has lots of information!! You can practiclly know everything about this game by looking at this article without even playing the game!
- Marioguy1 (talk) - I can't see anything wrong with it. All my problems have been taken care of.
- Edofenrir (talk) - And five, so the requirements for the featured article status are met. The manual copy story section was replaced by a self-written text, more images were added, and so on and so on. Any minor flaws that might have slipped from our vision shouldn't matter enough to interfere with the nomination.
- Booderdash (talk) Per everyone... though this is the first I've heard of this game.
Oppose
Removal of Opposes
Comments
Just so everyone knows, I am improving the stats section so... yeah you know what I mean.Fawfulfury65 (talk)
Edofenrir: Why are you "sceptical" about the story from the instruction manual? Fawfulfury65 (talk)
- Because I prefer self-written summaries over summaries copied from the instruction manual. I think it sound better to hand-type a paragraph instead of copying what someone else wrote. It's personal preference I guess. - Edofenrir (talk) 15:36, 19 October 2009 (EDT)
Marioguy1, there's no way to add anything in the story section since most of it is from the instruction booklet. I'll try to find something but keep that in mind. Fawfulfury65 (talk)
