MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Toadette: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(why can I still edit this)
m (Text replacement - "{{[Ff]a-archive" to "{{FA archive notice")
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{protect|archive}}
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
{{fa-archive}}
{{FA archive notice|nominated=17:16, 1 August 2011 (EDT)|passed=21:34, 1 August 2011 (EDT)}}
'''Toadette became a featured article at 20:34, 8 August 2011'''
===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]===
==== Support ====
==== Support ====
#{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} I've looked through this article and I found no tense errors or missing information. The article is written like an article (not a story), and there are enough images. All the sections have enough information possible. I think this article is fit to be featured.
#{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} I've looked through this article and I found no tense errors or missing information. The article is written like an article (not a story), and there are enough images. All the sections have enough information possible. I think this article is fit to be featured.
Line 13: Line 12:


==== Oppose ====
==== Oppose ====


==== Removal of Opposes ====
==== Removal of Opposes ====
Line 29: Line 27:


I'm done. What do you think? {{User|LeftyGreenMario}}
I'm done. What do you think? {{User|LeftyGreenMario}}
[[Category:FA succession archives]]

Latest revision as of 16:41, May 31, 2024

Smg2 icon bronzestar.png

This is an archive of a successful featured article nomination. If this page is unprotected, do not modify its contents, as it is an archive of past discussions.
Toadette was nominated to be a featured article at 17:16, 1 August 2011 (EDT) and passed at 20:34, 8 August 2011.


Toadette

Support

  1. LeftyGreenMario (talk) I've looked through this article and I found no tense errors or missing information. The article is written like an article (not a story), and there are enough images. All the sections have enough information possible. I think this article is fit to be featured.
  2. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)
  3. YoshiGo99 (talk)
  4. DKPetey99 (talk)
  5. Goomba's Shoe15 (talk)
  6. Toadette rules (talk)
  7. Byllant (talk)

Oppose

Removal of Opposes

Comments

There is still work that must be done. I'll try to add as much as I can to it. DKPetey99 (talk) 17:31, 1 August 2011 (EDT)

Like where? LeftyGreenMario (talk)

Look at my oppose vote. DKPetey99 (talk) 17:34, 1 August 2011 (EDT)

I don't see how Mario Party 6 and 8 need expansion. In Mario Party Advance, maybe it needs expansion, but I never played the game. LeftyGreenMario (talk)

I personally think we should merge the Mario Party section into one. DKPetey99 (talk) 17:38, 1 August 2011 (EDT)

I'm done. What do you think? LeftyGreenMario (talk)