MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N2/Badge: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(calling attention to that more-images template) |
m (Text replacement - "{{[Ff]a-archive" to "{{FA archive notice") |
||
| (9 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||4}}]]=== | ===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||4}}]]=== | ||
{{ | {{FA archive notice | ||
|unfeature=yes | |||
|nominated=15:57, January 23, 2021 (EST) | |nominated=15:57, January 23, 2021 (EST) | ||
|passed= | |passed=20:47, January 23, 2021 (EST) | ||
}} | }} | ||
==== Remove featured article status ==== | ==== Remove featured article status ==== | ||
#{{User|Ray Trace}} Main reason I'm nominating to unfeature this is [https://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=Badge&diff=next&oldid=2585774 the two-year old more images improvement template] on there that hasn't been addressed yet, so I'm calling attention to that. In addition, the article has suffered a major overhaul since it passed, as it used to be a complete list of all badges in the series until the list of badges got split off: this has made me have second thoughts if it is still worthy of being the best the wiki has to offer. If people disagree, then fine with that, but as long as the improvement tag on the article remains, this should not be featured. | #{{User|Ray Trace}} Main reason I'm nominating to unfeature this is [https://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=Badge&diff=next&oldid=2585774 the two-year old more images improvement template] on there that hasn't been addressed yet, so I'm calling attention to that. In addition, the article has suffered a major overhaul since it passed, as it used to be a complete list of all badges in the series until the list of badges got split off: this has made me have second thoughts if it is still worthy of being the best the wiki has to offer. If people disagree, then fine with that, but as long as the improvement tag on the article remains, this should not be featured. | ||
#{{User|Doomhiker}} With most badges split off, there's not much in here that makes it anything exceptional. In addition, the image template would prevent it from being FA worthy even if it was longer. | |||
#{{User|AwdryFan1997}} Per all. I'm allowed to say that here, right? | |||
#{{User|TheFlameChomp}} Per all. | |||
#{{User|Archivist Toadette}} Well, it seems I'm not the only one with serious doubts about this article's featured status. Per all. | |||
#{{User|Keyblade Master}} Seems like low quality to me if that same template has been there for two years. | |||
#{{User|MarioGamerFan24}} Normally I don't see these type of events, but if it is something that does not have much information, then I should considered it as being unfeatured. | |||
#{{User|The Mansion}} Per all. | |||
==== Keep featured article status ==== | ==== Keep featured article status ==== | ||
Latest revision as of 16:40, May 31, 2024
Badge[edit]
This is an archive of a successful unfeature article nomination. If this page is unprotected, do not modify its contents, as it is an archive of past discussions.
Badge was nominated to be unfeatured at 15:57, January 23, 2021 (EST) and passed at 20:47, 30 January 2021.
Remove featured article status[edit]
- Ray Trace (talk) Main reason I'm nominating to unfeature this is the two-year old more images improvement template on there that hasn't been addressed yet, so I'm calling attention to that. In addition, the article has suffered a major overhaul since it passed, as it used to be a complete list of all badges in the series until the list of badges got split off: this has made me have second thoughts if it is still worthy of being the best the wiki has to offer. If people disagree, then fine with that, but as long as the improvement tag on the article remains, this should not be featured.
- Doomhiker (talk) With most badges split off, there's not much in here that makes it anything exceptional. In addition, the image template would prevent it from being FA worthy even if it was longer.
- AwdryFan1997 (talk) Per all. I'm allowed to say that here, right?
- TheFlameChomp (talk) Per all.
- Archivist Toadette (talk) Well, it seems I'm not the only one with serious doubts about this article's featured status. Per all.
- Keyblade Master (talk) Seems like low quality to me if that same template has been there for two years.
- MarioGamerFan24 (talk) Normally I don't see these type of events, but if it is something that does not have much information, then I should considered it as being unfeatured.
- The Mansion (talk) Per all.
