Talk:Shadow (species): Difference between revisions
Time Turner (talk | contribs) |
m (Text replacement - "([Pp]roposal|[Ss]ettled)(Outcome|TPP)" to "$1 $2") |
||
| (10 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) | |||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==Delete this article== | ==Delete this article== | ||
{{TPP}} | {{Settled TPP}} | ||
{{Proposal outcome|passed|10-0|delete}} | |||
This is an entirely speculative species that provides nothing of note. There is no information in this article that is not made entirely redundant and ultimately pointless by the existence of other articles, including [[Shadow Sirens]] and [[Shadow Queen]]. There are [[Jojora's Friends|plenty]] and [[Bouldergeist|plenty]] and [[Funfun|plenty]] and ''[[Rawk Hawk|plenty]]'' of individuals that do not have articles about their hypothetical species, and we shouldn't have them in the first place, especially if we have nothing new to say (and no, restating the obvious and wild speculation does not count). This is to say nothing of the precedent set by the deletion of [[Talk:Piranha_Bud#Delete_this_page|Piranha Bud]], [[Talk:Puff_(species)#Delete_Puff_.28species.29|Puff]], [[Talk:Goom#Delete_Goom|Goom]], [[Talk:Stu#Delete_Stu|Stu]], and others. To put it simply, there is no merit to this article; therefore, I want to delete it. | This is an entirely speculative species that provides nothing of note. There is no information in this article that is not made entirely redundant and ultimately pointless by the existence of other articles, including [[Shadow Sirens]] and [[Shadow Queen]]. There are [[Jojora's Friends|plenty]] and [[Bouldergeist|plenty]] and [[Funfun|plenty]] and ''[[Rawk Hawk|plenty]]'' of individuals that do not have articles about their hypothetical species, and we shouldn't have them in the first place, especially if we have nothing new to say (and no, restating the obvious and wild speculation does not count). This is to say nothing of the precedent set by the deletion of [[Talk:Piranha_Bud#Delete_this_page|Piranha Bud]], [[Talk:Puff_(species)#Delete_Puff_.28species.29|Puff]], [[Talk:Goom#Delete_Goom|Goom]], [[Talk:Stu#Delete_Stu|Stu]], and others. To put it simply, there is no merit to this article; therefore, I want to delete it. | ||
'''Proposer''': {{User|Time Turner}}<br> | '''Proposer''': {{User|Time Turner}}<br> | ||
'''Deadline''': | '''Deadline''': October 10, 2017, 23:59 GMT | ||
===Support=== | ===Support=== | ||
| Line 22: | Line 23: | ||
#{{User|Doc von Schmeltwick}} Honestly the actual species name seems to just be Shadow Siren, so why not describe it there? | #{{User|Doc von Schmeltwick}} Honestly the actual species name seems to just be Shadow Siren, so why not describe it there? | ||
#{{User|Yoshi the SSM}} Per all. | #{{User|Yoshi the SSM}} Per all. | ||
#{{User|Niiue}} Per all. | |||
#[[User:Char89Charizard|Char89Charizard]] ([[User talk:Char89Charizard|talk]]) Per proposal. | |||
#{{User|Camwood777}} - HOLY SPECULATIVE BATMAN!! | |||
===Oppose=== | ===Oppose=== | ||
| Line 27: | Line 31: | ||
===Comments=== | ===Comments=== | ||
@Doc: I took "Shadow Sirens" to be the name of Beldam's group and not the name of their species (and indeed, the wiki classifies it as a group). {{User:Time Turner/sig}} 17:27, 26 September 2017 (EDT) | @Doc: I took "Shadow Sirens" to be the name of Beldam's group and not the name of their species (and indeed, the wiki classifies it as a group). {{User:Time Turner/sig}} 17:27, 26 September 2017 (EDT) | ||
:What "species" are they then if this article is deleted? --{{User:Wildgoosespeeder/sig}} 16:12, 7 October 2017 (EDT) | |||
::I make a point in the proposal about how not literally every individual needs to have a clear-cut, defined species, especially when it is born of nothing but speculation. {{User:Time Turner/sig}} 16:15, 7 October 2017 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 16:30, May 31, 2024
Aren't they demons of some kind? I vaguely remember Frankly or Goombella referring to the Shadow Queen as an ancient Demon Goomb-omb 00:45, 24 June 2009 (EDT)
-Actually, yes. You're right. The Shadow Queen HAS been referred to as a demon many times in the game, so it's possible that the Shadow Sirens were, too.
SolarBlaze 00:51, 25 June 2009 (EDT)
It's probably like when somebody calls something a monster: they mean it's a diabolical, cruel, living creature. Hello, I'm Time Turner.
Delete this article[edit]
|
This talk page proposal has already been settled. Please do not edit any of the sections in the proposal. If you wish to discuss the article, do so in a new header below the proposal. |
delete 10-0
This is an entirely speculative species that provides nothing of note. There is no information in this article that is not made entirely redundant and ultimately pointless by the existence of other articles, including Shadow Sirens and Shadow Queen. There are plenty and plenty and plenty and plenty of individuals that do not have articles about their hypothetical species, and we shouldn't have them in the first place, especially if we have nothing new to say (and no, restating the obvious and wild speculation does not count). This is to say nothing of the precedent set by the deletion of Piranha Bud, Puff, Goom, Stu, and others. To put it simply, there is no merit to this article; therefore, I want to delete it.
Proposer: Time Turner (talk)
Deadline: October 10, 2017, 23:59 GMT
Support[edit]
- Time Turner (talk) Per proposal.
- Toadette the Achiever (talk) Per proposal.
- Ultimate Mr. L (talk) For neither the first nor last time, I find myself saying: "This page exists?" Per proposal.
- TheFlameChomp (talk) Per proposal.
- LuigiMaster123 (talk) Per proposal.
- Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) Honestly the actual species name seems to just be Shadow Siren, so why not describe it there?
- Yoshi the SSM (talk) Per all.
- Niiue (talk) Per all.
- Char89Charizard (talk) Per proposal.
- Camwood777 (talk) - HOLY SPECULATIVE BATMAN!!
Oppose[edit]
Comments[edit]
@Doc: I took "Shadow Sirens" to be the name of Beldam's group and not the name of their species (and indeed, the wiki classifies it as a group). Hello, I'm Time Turner. 17:27, 26 September 2017 (EDT)
- What "species" are they then if this article is deleted? --Wildgoosespeeder (talk) (Stats - Contribs) 16:12, 7 October 2017 (EDT)
- I make a point in the proposal about how not literally every individual needs to have a clear-cut, defined species, especially when it is born of nothing but speculation. Hello, I'm Time Turner. 16:15, 7 October 2017 (EDT)
