Talk:Bell Kritter: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Fawfulfury65 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
m (Text replacement - "([Pp]roposal|[Ss]ettled)(Outcome|TPP)" to "$1 $2") |
||
| (16 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Is there anything that separates these Kritters from other Kritters? {{User:Reversinator/sig}} | Is there anything that separates these Kritters from other Kritters? {{User:Reversinator/sig}} | ||
:Nope, they shouldn't have an article. {{User:Fawfulfury65/sig}} | :Nope, they shouldn't have an article. {{User:Fawfulfury65/sig}} | ||
They seem to be characters, but extremely minor characters. I agree, this article probably shouldn't stand alone.--{{User|Knife}} 04:44, 20 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
==Merge this article with [[Kritter#Donkey Kong 64]]== | |||
{{Settled TPP}} | |||
{{Proposal outcome|passed|5-0|merge}} | |||
As discussed above, this article concerns a minor subject which is subordinated from a greater species. I stand by the policy at [[MarioWiki:Minor NPCs]], which describes that conjectural-named, minor characters should be merged with their relevant species. | |||
'''Proposer:''' {{User|YoshiKong}}<br> | |||
'''Deadline:''' October 17 2012, 23:59 GMT | |||
====Support==== | |||
#{{User|YoshiKong}} Per policy. | |||
#{{User|Coooool123}} Per Yoshikong. Plus, do we really need yet another tiny article, wasting space? MERGE POWER!!! | |||
#{{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} Why does this even have an article in the first place when it can be easily merged into Kritter? | |||
#{{User|Kelton2}} Of course. What is with all these small articles that should be merged? | |||
#{{User|Yoshi K}} Hey guys! If we should keep this article, we should make one for the bell they ring too! So in other words, merge. | |||
====Oppose==== | |||
====Comments?==== | |||
@Kelton2: Tell me about it. Plus, everyone seems to want to split all the articles of different sizes (eg Mega/Mini versions of the same thing). It's so pointless.{{User|Coooool123}} | |||
:Size really shouldn't matter when it comes to deciding an article's merit. I mean, I've created [[Tornado (item)|many]] [[Broken Wheel|different]] [[Banana Shot|item]] [[Big & Small Tire|articles]] currently-all are small-yet they are still standalone items and stuff. It's only for stuff like this where this article can be merged into another and still make sense {{User:BabyLuigiOnFire/sig}} | |||
Latest revision as of 15:26, May 31, 2024
Is there anything that separates these Kritters from other Kritters? Hello, I'm Time Turner.
They seem to be characters, but extremely minor characters. I agree, this article probably shouldn't stand alone.--Knife (talk) 04:44, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
Merge this article with Kritter#Donkey Kong 64[edit]
|
This talk page proposal has already been settled. Please do not edit any of the sections in the proposal. If you wish to discuss the article, do so in a new header below the proposal. |
merge 5-0
As discussed above, this article concerns a minor subject which is subordinated from a greater species. I stand by the policy at MarioWiki:Minor NPCs, which describes that conjectural-named, minor characters should be merged with their relevant species.
Proposer: YoshiKong (talk)
Deadline: October 17 2012, 23:59 GMT
Support[edit]
- YoshiKong (talk) Per policy.
- Coooool123 (talk) Per Yoshikong. Plus, do we really need yet another tiny article, wasting space? MERGE POWER!!!
- BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) Why does this even have an article in the first place when it can be easily merged into Kritter?
- Kelton2 (talk) Of course. What is with all these small articles that should be merged?
- Yoshi K (talk) Hey guys! If we should keep this article, we should make one for the bell they ring too! So in other words, merge.
Oppose[edit]
Comments?[edit]
@Kelton2: Tell me about it. Plus, everyone seems to want to split all the articles of different sizes (eg Mega/Mini versions of the same thing). It's so pointless.Coooool123 (talk)
- Size really shouldn't matter when it comes to deciding an article's merit. I mean, I've created many different item articles currently-all are small-yet they are still standalone items and stuff. It's only for stuff like this where this article can be merged into another and still make sense
Ray Trace(T|C)
