Talk:List of moves: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Talk:Moves moved to Talk:Special Moves: So are we gonna add "walking" to the list?)
mNo edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:


Sure, Special Moves is good. And the page needs work, so fix it as you see fit. Maybe we can organize them by "type" of move? --<span style=" -variant: small-caps;">'''[[User:Porplemontage|Steve]]''' (''[[User talk:Porplemontage|talk]]'')</span> 19:24, 8 September 2006 (EDT)
Sure, Special Moves is good. And the page needs work, so fix it as you see fit. Maybe we can organize them by "type" of move? --<span style=" -variant: small-caps;">'''[[User:Porplemontage|Steve]]''' (''[[User talk:Porplemontage|talk]]'')</span> 19:24, 8 September 2006 (EDT)
==Specific >> General >> Story==
We need more specific information on each attack listed and less about the characters that use them (which is why we have character pages). Stats, lists of characters/enemies that use said attack, general information about the nature of the attack. See [[Breaker Beam]] and it's previous edits for an example of what I'm talking about. -- [[User:Ghost Jam|Ghost Jam]] 20:45, 1 October 2006 (EDT)

Revision as of 20:45, October 1, 2006

Should we move this page to Special Moves? Moves just sounds so basic, like walking and riding the bus? Plus, it would match up with the category Special Moves. -- Son of Suns

Also, why are items on the list? This is a page for special moves, right? -- Son of Suns

Sure, Special Moves is good. And the page needs work, so fix it as you see fit. Maybe we can organize them by "type" of move? --Steve (talk) 19:24, 8 September 2006 (EDT)

Specific >> General >> Story

We need more specific information on each attack listed and less about the characters that use them (which is why we have character pages). Stats, lists of characters/enemies that use said attack, general information about the nature of the attack. See Breaker Beam and it's previous edits for an example of what I'm talking about. -- Ghost Jam 20:45, 1 October 2006 (EDT)