Category talk:Policies: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Reverted edits by DemeGeek (talk) to last revision by Knife)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:


== Move? ==
== Move? ==
Should we move [[MarioWiki:Canonicity]] and perhaps [[MarioWiki:Importance Policy]] under  [[:Category:Writer Guidelines]]? They seem to aim more toward writers than a general policy, like the personal images one. Also, those articles refer to how the writers should handle mainspace articles rather than lay down rules. What do you guys think?{{User:SpikeKnifeNeedleSword/sig}} 15:47, 24 August 2007 (EDT)
Should we move [[MarioWiki:Canonicity]] and perhaps [[MarioWiki:Importance Policy]] under  [[:Category:Writing guidelines]]? They seem to aim more toward writers than a general policy, like the personal images one. Also, those articles refer to how the writers should handle mainspace articles rather than lay down rules. What do you guys think?{{User:SpikeKnifeNeedleSword/sig}} 15:47, 24 August 2007 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 18:59, February 11, 2021

Are we slacking?[edit]

Some of these are outdated. Other parts are completely unenforced.SaudyTalk!

The only page I see that has troubles is the Personal images section. Everything else is fine. Wa Yoshihead.png TC@Y 19:45, 9 April 2007 (EDT)

Move?[edit]

Should we move MarioWiki:Canonicity and perhaps MarioWiki:Importance Policy under Category:Writing guidelines? They seem to aim more toward writers than a general policy, like the personal images one. Also, those articles refer to how the writers should handle mainspace articles rather than lay down rules. What do you guys think?Knife (talk) 15:47, 24 August 2007 (EDT)