Talk:Rhomp: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (→Are these a real variant?: Formatting issue) |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Are these a real variant? == | == Are these a real variant? == | ||
To be honest, these aren’t a real Thwomp variant. They’re too similar to Spindels. | To be honest, these aren’t a real Thwomp variant. They’re too similar to Spindels. [[User:CBFan5|CBFan5]] ([[User talk:CBFan5|talk]]) 18:09, June 16, 2020 (EDT) | ||
[[User:CBFan5|CBFan5]] ([[User talk:CBFan5|talk]]) | :Yes they are; they can be considered spiritual successors to Spindels. {{User:Toadette the Achiever/sig}} 18:17, June 16, 2020 (EDT) | ||
::For this reason I moved them to "relatives" a while back, actually, because while Thwomps and Spindels are both almost certainly ''inspirations'', that does not mean the same as a "variant of" it. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 21:23, June 16, 2020 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 20:23, June 16, 2020
Are these a real variant?[edit]
To be honest, these aren’t a real Thwomp variant. They’re too similar to Spindels. CBFan5 (talk) 18:09, June 16, 2020 (EDT)
- Yes they are; they can be considered spiritual successors to Spindels.
(T|C) 18:17, June 16, 2020 (EDT)
- For this reason I moved them to "relatives" a while back, actually, because while Thwomps and Spindels are both almost certainly inspirations, that does not mean the same as a "variant of" it. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 21:23, June 16, 2020 (EDT)
