Talk:Tiptron: Difference between revisions
YoshiPickle (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Tippetarius (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
== Wrong name == | == Wrong name == | ||
:Her name is Timpani, not Tipani, and Blumiere's father killed Timpani, so Blumiere tried to destroy all worlds to get revenge on everything that took Timpani away from him (which is strange, because Blumiere killed his father before he attempted to destroy all worlds, even though his father was all that took Timpani away from him).[[User:M&L|M&L Beware my fury!]] 20:26, 29 January 2012 (EST) | :Her name is Timpani, not Tipani, and Blumiere's father killed Timpani, so Blumiere tried to destroy all worlds to get revenge on everything that took Timpani away from him (which is strange, because Blumiere killed his father before he attempted to destroy all worlds, even though his father was all that took Timpani away from him).[[User:M&L|M&L Beware my fury!]] 20:26, 29 January 2012 (EST) | ||
== Classification as a Pixl == | |||
Forgive me if I'm wrong on this, but does Tiptron qualify as an actual Pixl? I'm aware that she's a replica of one, but only as far as being based off of Francis's observations of Tippi. It's not as though she has a game-overed soul inside her like real Pixls do, and she's clearly more robotic than they are...I just wanted to make sure she can actually be considered one. [[User:Beachbum13|Beachbum13]] ([[User talk:Beachbum13|talk]]) 19:23, 23 April 2018 (EDT) | |||
:It seems to think of itself as a Pixl, and various guides also classify it with the others, so I don't see why it shouldn't be one. {{User:Alex95/sig}} 19:52, 23 April 2018 (EDT) | |||
:Well, the guide probably lists her alongside the others due to her role - that doesn't mean she's an actual Pixl. And she also thinks she's Tippi, too, but we all know she's not. I think she should be classified as what she is, a robotic imitation of a Pixl, but not an actual Pixl itself. (Since, as mentioned, she's clearly not made using the same technology.) [[User:Tippetarius|Tippetarius]] ([[User talk:Tippetarius|talk]]) 01:37, 13 February 2019 (EST) | |||
Latest revision as of 02:37, February 13, 2019
Tiptron is definitely a separate entity entirely, a robot. It deserves its own article. Wa 
TC@Y 19:48, 11 April 2007 (EDT)
oh. Sorry. I just, you know, you guys kept deleting it... so I thought... Max2 (talk) sorry!
Count Bleck and Tippi get married?!?!--
Aipom 
--
Damn, I GOT SPOILED!SPOILER TAG, ANYONE?
The following contains a sentence of spoilers from the Youtube videos I saw. Click "Show" to view.<showhide>__HIDER__<hide>Yes, "Tipani" and "Blumiere" are married. Tipani leaves Blumiere and out of spite he tries to destroy all worlds. Bleck is willing to reverse what he's done but Dimentio takes over.</hide></showhide>
Wa TC@Y 20:46, 13 April 2007 (EDT)
Wrong name[edit]
- Her name is Timpani, not Tipani, and Blumiere's father killed Timpani, so Blumiere tried to destroy all worlds to get revenge on everything that took Timpani away from him (which is strange, because Blumiere killed his father before he attempted to destroy all worlds, even though his father was all that took Timpani away from him).M&L Beware my fury! 20:26, 29 January 2012 (EST)
Classification as a Pixl[edit]
Forgive me if I'm wrong on this, but does Tiptron qualify as an actual Pixl? I'm aware that she's a replica of one, but only as far as being based off of Francis's observations of Tippi. It's not as though she has a game-overed soul inside her like real Pixls do, and she's clearly more robotic than they are...I just wanted to make sure she can actually be considered one. Beachbum13 (talk) 19:23, 23 April 2018 (EDT)
- It seems to think of itself as a Pixl, and various guides also classify it with the others, so I don't see why it shouldn't be one.
19:52, 23 April 2018 (EDT) - Well, the guide probably lists her alongside the others due to her role - that doesn't mean she's an actual Pixl. And she also thinks she's Tippi, too, but we all know she's not. I think she should be classified as what she is, a robotic imitation of a Pixl, but not an actual Pixl itself. (Since, as mentioned, she's clearly not made using the same technology.) Tippetarius (talk) 01:37, 13 February 2019 (EST)
