Talk:MS-DOS: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:It's better as just a simple category. The current article is awfully detailed and off-topic. It seems like we ''don't'' have a category for this yet. Also, categorizing this as a Video Game system and putting it in the "Video Game Consoles and Add-ons" navigational template seems to be a bit of a stretch. {{User:Bazooka Mario/sig}} 15:26, 30 July 2018 (EDT) | :It's better as just a simple category. The current article is awfully detailed and off-topic. It seems like we ''don't'' have a category for this yet. Also, categorizing this as a Video Game system and putting it in the "Video Game Consoles and Add-ons" navigational template seems to be a bit of a stretch. {{User:Bazooka Mario/sig}} 15:26, 30 July 2018 (EDT) | ||
::Agreed. I do like the idea of having it as a category instead. [[User:RollerC|rollerC]] ([[User talk:RollerC|talk]]) 17:54, 30 July 2018 (EDT) | ::Agreed. I do like the idea of having it as a category instead. [[User:RollerC|rollerC]] ([[User talk:RollerC|talk]]) 17:54, 30 July 2018 (EDT) | ||
==Article to category proposal== | |||
===Turn this article into a category=== | |||
Essentially, the Games section would become: "List of Mario games released for the MS-DOS". Similarly, the Wiki could hold categories for Mario games released on Windows, etc. | |||
'''Proposer''': {{User|rollerC}}<br> | |||
'''Deadline''': August 6, 2018, 23:59 GMT | |||
===Support=== | |||
#{{User|rollerC}} As discussed before in both the Discord and the above talk section, this article is incredibly off-topic to the subject of Mario, and the only relevant information is the list of Mario games released for the MS-DOS. {{User|Bazooka Mario}} makes a good point that the information in the article would be ''much'' better served in a category page, rather than include the unnecessary clutter that is the information on the MS-DOS, which most users visiting the website are probably not looking for anyway. | |||
===Oppose=== | |||
===Comments=== | |||
After this proposal is complete, I'll remove the unresolved conflict box. [[User:RollerC|rollerC]] ([[User talk:RollerC|talk]]) 18:59, 30 July 2018 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 17:59, July 30, 2018
Is this page worth keeping?
|
This talk page or section has a conflict or question that needs to be answered. Please try to help and resolve the issue by leaving a comment. |
I personally don't see any point in having a Mario Wiki page about the MS-DOS, and as was mentioned in the Discord earlier, it validates articles such as a Windows article to be created. rollerC (talk) 01:45, 30 July 2018 (EDT)
- It's better as just a simple category. The current article is awfully detailed and off-topic. It seems like we don't have a category for this yet. Also, categorizing this as a Video Game system and putting it in the "Video Game Consoles and Add-ons" navigational template seems to be a bit of a stretch.
It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 15:26, 30 July 2018 (EDT)
Article to category proposal
Turn this article into a category
Essentially, the Games section would become: "List of Mario games released for the MS-DOS". Similarly, the Wiki could hold categories for Mario games released on Windows, etc.
Proposer: rollerC (talk)
Deadline: August 6, 2018, 23:59 GMT
Support
- rollerC (talk) As discussed before in both the Discord and the above talk section, this article is incredibly off-topic to the subject of Mario, and the only relevant information is the list of Mario games released for the MS-DOS. Bazooka Mario (talk) makes a good point that the information in the article would be much better served in a category page, rather than include the unnecessary clutter that is the information on the MS-DOS, which most users visiting the website are probably not looking for anyway.
Oppose
Comments
After this proposal is complete, I'll remove the unresolved conflict box. rollerC (talk) 18:59, 30 July 2018 (EDT)
