MarioWiki:Appeals: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:


==Cases==
==Cases==
===rjd1922===
===Raymond1922A===
*[[User talk:Raymond1922A#Warning]]
*[[User talk:Raymond1922A#Warning]]
====rjd1922====
====Raymond1922A====
*My comment on [[Talk:Hotaru]] was simply a joke meant to make a point about the problems of using Japanese words. I did not mean to call any user on this site a ''baka'' or assume bad faith.
*My comment on [[Talk:Hotaru]] was simply a joke meant to make a point about the problems of using Japanese words. I did not mean to call any user on this site a ''baka'' or assume bad faith.
[[User talk:Raymond1922A#Warning]]
[[User talk:Raymond1922A#Warning]]
====Baby Luigi====
*Regardless if it was a joke, which I find to be frankly rude, out of nowhere, and uncalled for, calling other users a "fool" or "idiot" in Japanese for following established policy guidelines is not acceptable behavior. Also, I did took offense to your wording of saying that it's not "kawaii", because I felt like you're also stereotyping some types people who sometimes pepper Japanese in their writings. I don't think this type of condescension is very respectful. While it is possible that I was too heavy-handed with handing out warning, I still think you should receive at least an official reminder for your behavior.


{{Shortcut|MW:APPEALS}}
{{Shortcut|MW:APPEALS}}

Revision as of 00:44, March 6, 2018

This page is an appeal system for reminders, warnings, and last warnings. If you feel you have wrongly received a reminder or a warning, follow the instructions below to appeal the reminder/warning to the administrators. Please keep discussions civil.

Archived appeals can be found here. This page observes the no-signature policy.

Notes

If you feel that you have been wrongfully given a reminder and/or warning, you can have your case heard here. Please read through the "How to" and the "Rules" carefully. Please note that both the users appealing the reminder/warning and the users who issued the reminder/warning are given a chance to present the administrators with reasons to rule in their favor. However, said comments can only be edited once; this will not expand into lengthy, back-and-forth arguments such as the ones found in proposal comments and talk page discussions.

Rules

  1. No case can be heard more than once. Once a decision is made, that decision is final.
  2. If the reminder or warning you issued is overturned, do not re-add it, or it will be removed immediately, and you may be reprimanded yourself if the administrators feel it is necessary.

How to

This is an example of what your appeal should look like; improperly formatted appeals will be deleted. If you are inexperienced or unsure how to set up this format, simply copy the following and paste it into the "Cases" section. Then replace the "[subject]" variables (including the squared brackets) with the proper information.

===[Your username here]===
*[Insert link to reminder/warning from your talk page]
====[Your username here]====
*[Insert your comments on why the reminder/warning was unnecessary]
====[The issuer of the warning's username here]====
*[Insert your comments on why the reminder/warning was necessary (this section is for the issuer only)]
----

Important: After posting your appeal, make sure that you use {{appeal notice}} to inform the issuer that their warning/reminder is under dispute.

Cases

Raymond1922A

Raymond1922A

  • My comment on Talk:Hotaru was simply a joke meant to make a point about the problems of using Japanese words. I did not mean to call any user on this site a baka or assume bad faith.

User talk:Raymond1922A#Warning

Baby Luigi

  • Regardless if it was a joke, which I find to be frankly rude, out of nowhere, and uncalled for, calling other users a "fool" or "idiot" in Japanese for following established policy guidelines is not acceptable behavior. Also, I did took offense to your wording of saying that it's not "kawaii", because I felt like you're also stereotyping some types people who sometimes pepper Japanese in their writings. I don't think this type of condescension is very respectful. While it is possible that I was too heavy-handed with handing out warning, I still think you should receive at least an official reminder for your behavior.