MarioWiki:Featured articles/N2/Mario Hoops 3-on-3: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→‎Removal of opposes: Since everyone is saying, "per BLOF", I'm putting this, and plus, who the heck is BLOF? Sounds like some kind of stupid alien spaceship or UFO.)
Line 16: Line 16:
'''Alex95 and other BLOF voters'''
'''Alex95 and other BLOF voters'''
#{{User|Lcrossmk8}} There are a lot of articles that do not have reception sections, so saying that this article shouldn't be featured because it doesn't have a reception section is contradictory.
#{{User|Lcrossmk8}} There are a lot of articles that do not have reception sections, so saying that this article shouldn't be featured because it doesn't have a reception section is contradictory.
'''Time Turner'''
#{{User|DKPetey99}} I'm sorry, but where is the improvement tag on the article?


==== Comments ====
==== Comments ====

Revision as of 21:39, December 23, 2017

Mario Hoops 3-on-3

"Mario Hoops 3-on-3" was nominated for featured article status at 19:57, 23 December 2017 (EST). If the nomination does not pass by 00:57, 22 February 2018, it will be considered failed.

Support

  1. DKPetey99 (talk) This article covers everything about the game. The character list looks nice, as well as the charts of different balls and items. It covers everything from the practice mode and for the other challenges. The article is also written very well and there are no templates for rewrites, construction, etc.I believe the state of this article reflects one of the best the Wiki has to offer, and deserves to be featured.
  2. Lcrossmk8 (talk) Yeah, I'm with Pete on this one. There are no construction or rewrite templates anywhere, and every part of the article is well-written, concise, clear, and pays strong attention to detail. This article most definitely deserves to be a featured article.

Oppose

  1. Alex95 (talk) - imo, needs a reception section.
  2. Time Turner (talk) Per BLOF. This is not passing with an improvement tag and an empty section.
  3. YoshiStar28 (talk) Per BLOF.

Removal of opposes

Alex95 and other BLOF voters

  1. Lcrossmk8 (talk) There are a lot of articles that do not have reception sections, so saying that this article shouldn't be featured because it doesn't have a reception section is contradictory.

Time Turner

  1. DKPetey99 (talk) I'm sorry, but where is the improvement tag on the article?

Comments

I have several things to say about the article:

  1. The intro definitely needs to be expanded on. I could fill that in easily if you give me some time.
  2. The article could use a reception section.
  3. There are still empty sections, such the staff section. We can't have that in the article.
  4. I feel like the gameplay section could be expanded on even more detail, talking about the rules and the overall objective of the sport.
  5. Item image quality is not good quality. Are there any sprites ripped for that?

It's been a while since I last played the game, not sure if there's any missing information, so I may do some research here and there. BabyLuigiFire.pngRay Trace(T|C) 20:42, 23 December 2017 (EST)

Retrieved from "https://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=MarioWiki:Featured_articles/N2/Mario_Hoops_3-on-3&oldid=2362158"