Talk:Gary (Super Paper Mario): Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Time Turner (talk | contribs) (did somebody mention mpa) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:Well, they are named individuals no matter how generic they look. It's pretty much why we have articles like [[Paratroopa (character)]] and [[Lakitu (character)]]. {{User:Baby Luigi/sig}} 18:29, 13 May 2017 (EDT) | :Well, they are named individuals no matter how generic they look. It's pretty much why we have articles like [[Paratroopa (character)]] and [[Lakitu (character)]]. {{User:Baby Luigi/sig}} 18:29, 13 May 2017 (EDT) | ||
::[[MarioWiki:Minor NPCs|Policy supports giving articles to any named NPCs,]] and also, the MPA characters have more going for them than just a name as I have argued time and time again. {{User:Time Turner/sig}} 19:10, 13 May 2017 (EDT) | ::[[MarioWiki:Minor NPCs|Policy supports giving articles to any named NPCs,]] and also, the MPA characters have more going for them than just a name as I have argued time and time again. {{User:Time Turner/sig}} 19:10, 13 May 2017 (EDT) | ||
:::OK, thanks, but now I have another thing to say. The Minor NPCs policy also says that if an unnamed NPC has some sort of improtance to the story, they should also be given an article. So should {{conjecturaltext|Larry}} (Gary's friend) get an article? Or would it be redundant since he serves the exact same purpose as Gary? Sorry if I sound disagreeable, but I'm still new to some policies. | |||
:::{{User:Ultimate Mr. L/sig}} 19:20, 13 May 2017 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 19:20, May 13, 2017
Do we really need this article? It seems pretty useless. This info can be found on Luigi's page. Just because his name is mentioned once doesn't mean he gets an article. It's just a random generic name they threw in because his buddy needed to call him something (same thing with this guy). He doesn't deserve an article anymore than his partner (Larry?) does. As a matter of fact, we have quite a few articles like this that I'm really not sure about.
(--) 17:57, 13 May 2017 (EDT)
- Well, they are named individuals no matter how generic they look. It's pretty much why we have articles like Paratroopa (character) and Lakitu (character).
Ray Trace(T|C) 18:29, 13 May 2017 (EDT)
- Policy supports giving articles to any named NPCs, and also, the MPA characters have more going for them than just a name as I have argued time and time again. Hello, I'm Time Turner. 19:10, 13 May 2017 (EDT)
- OK, thanks, but now I have another thing to say. The Minor NPCs policy also says that if an unnamed NPC has some sort of improtance to the story, they should also be given an article. So should Template:Conjecturaltext (Gary's friend) get an article? Or would it be redundant since he serves the exact same purpose as Gary? Sorry if I sound disagreeable, but I'm still new to some policies.
- (--) 19:20, 13 May 2017 (EDT)
- Policy supports giving articles to any named NPCs, and also, the MPA characters have more going for them than just a name as I have argued time and time again. Hello, I'm Time Turner. 19:10, 13 May 2017 (EDT)
