MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Mario Kart: Super Circuit: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 16:30, February 9, 2017

Mario Kart: Super Circuit was nominated to be unfeatured at 21:09, 20 May 2014 (EDT).

Mario Kart: Super Circuit failed unfeaturing requirements at 08:08, 23 May 2014, and is currently able to be renominated.

Baby Luigi (talk) I wouldn't call this article "flowery writing". Sure, maybe it has some Captain Obvious points (which I fixed) but it's all objective and straight to the point: I don't see any padding. I don't see the bad writing either; your point about "too many dots where it shouldn't be"? Do you mean periods or bullet points? Your points are very vague and I just don't see any problem with this article. Of course I wrote most of this....................so I might be a bit biased about it.
Yoshi876 (talk) Per Baby Luigi, I wouldn't call that writing flowery.

Also in the reception section Joao mispelled. The correct is .João. I know it 'cause this is my name :P User:Ashley anEoTselkie/sig

If you read the source, that's where I got the name from. There's no accent in the name for some reason in the source.

Ray Trace^(T|C) 21:20, 20 May 2014 (EDT)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 __NOTOC__
-===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||4}}]]===
+===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]===
-{{UNFANOMSTAT
+{{UNFANOMFAIL
 |nominated=21:09, 20 May 2014 (EDT)
-|passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last opposet  by copying it from the history of the page.-->
+|lastedit=08:08, 23 April 2014 (GMT)
 }}
+==== Remove Featured Article Status ====
 ==== Keep Featured Article Status ====
 #{{User|Baby Luigi}} I wouldn't call this article "flowery writing". Sure, maybe it has some Captain Obvious points (which I fixed) but it's all objective and straight to the point: I don't see any padding. I don't see the bad writing either; your point about "too many dots where it shouldn't be"? Do you mean periods or bullet points? Your points are very vague and I just don't see any problem with this article. Of course '''I''' wrote most of this....................so I might be a bit biased about it.