Talk:Paper Luigi: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Should this distinction be made? I say yes. Discuss.--{{User:Eldritchdraaks/sig}} 15:23, 27 November 2016 (EST) | Should this distinction be made? I say yes. Discuss.--{{User:Eldritchdraaks/sig}} 15:23, 27 November 2016 (EST) | ||
:I mean, [[Paper Peach]] doesn't have that sentence that already repeats what the Articleabout on the top already states, so I find it very redundant and not needed. {{User:Baby Luigi/sig}} 15:25, 27 November 2016 (EST) | :I mean, [[Paper Peach]] doesn't have that sentence that already repeats what the Articleabout on the top already states, so I find it very redundant and not needed. {{User:Baby Luigi/sig}} 15:25, 27 November 2016 (EST) | ||
::I still think that's a bold statement to take. The [http://www.mariowiki.com/MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive_44#Deal_with_the_duplicate_Paper_subjects_in_Mario_.26_Luigi:_Paper_Jam proposal] had separated this Luigi out ''mostly'' for the sake of wiki organization alone. I don't think it's making a statement on this character's identity beyond that. I mean, this Paper Luigi could be the same Luigi you see in the previous Paper Mario games; there isn't any evidence to the contrary no matter how many inferences you make (e.g. they're from a storybook). Instead, we separate this article within the scope of ''Paper Jam'' because otherwise, it would be a pretty messy situation. Anyhow, readers can get their own inferences from the article's state and the articleabout template, so either way, there's no need for that line, even if we aren't trying to fill in the lines ourselves. {{User:Bazooka Mario/sig}} 15:30, 27 November 2016 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 15:30, November 27, 2016
"Luigi himself was previously depicted in "paper" form in the Paper Mario series games, but the two characters are not the same. "
Should this distinction be made? I say yes. Discuss.--
15:23, 27 November 2016 (EST)
- I mean, Paper Peach doesn't have that sentence that already repeats what the Articleabout on the top already states, so I find it very redundant and not needed.
Ray Trace(T|C) 15:25, 27 November 2016 (EST)
- I still think that's a bold statement to take. The proposal had separated this Luigi out mostly for the sake of wiki organization alone. I don't think it's making a statement on this character's identity beyond that. I mean, this Paper Luigi could be the same Luigi you see in the previous Paper Mario games; there isn't any evidence to the contrary no matter how many inferences you make (e.g. they're from a storybook). Instead, we separate this article within the scope of Paper Jam because otherwise, it would be a pretty messy situation. Anyhow, readers can get their own inferences from the article's state and the articleabout template, so either way, there's no need for that line, even if we aren't trying to fill in the lines ourselves.
It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 15:30, 27 November 2016 (EST)
- I still think that's a bold statement to take. The proposal had separated this Luigi out mostly for the sake of wiki organization alone. I don't think it's making a statement on this character's identity beyond that. I mean, this Paper Luigi could be the same Luigi you see in the previous Paper Mario games; there isn't any evidence to the contrary no matter how many inferences you make (e.g. they're from a storybook). Instead, we separate this article within the scope of Paper Jam because otherwise, it would be a pretty messy situation. Anyhow, readers can get their own inferences from the article's state and the articleabout template, so either way, there's no need for that line, even if we aren't trying to fill in the lines ourselves.
