Talk:Blooper (Paper Mario: The Thousand-Year Door): Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Is it possible to merge this back with the main Blooper article considering that RPG Gamer didn't create a proposal or discuss about this to split this Blooper from the main Blooper article?--{{User:LudwigVon/sig}} 18:24, 26 November 2016 (EST) | Is it possible to merge this back with the main Blooper article considering that RPG Gamer didn't create a proposal or discuss about this to split this Blooper from the main Blooper article?--{{User:LudwigVon/sig}} 18:24, 26 November 2016 (EST) | ||
:You can, but you'll have to get an admin to delete this page. {{User:Bazooka Mario/sig}} 14:12, 27 November 2016 (EST) | :You can, but you'll have to get an admin to delete this page. {{User:Bazooka Mario/sig}} 14:12, 27 November 2016 (EST) | ||
::I agree. For stuff like this, a proposal should've been made. This should be moved back. {{User:Alex95/sig}} 14:15, 27 November 2016 (EST) |
Revision as of 14:15, November 27, 2016
This talk page or section has a conflict or question that needs to be answered. Please try to help and resolve the issue by leaving a comment. |
Why should this get its own page? Because this seems to go against precedent (how we merged the Wigglers from the Mario & Luigi games recently). It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 18:46, 25 November 2016 (EST)
- Yeah, I was just thinking about it, The RPG Gamer (talk) should have create a proposal or discuss this topic before creating a page about it. In my opinion, it should have stay with the main Blooper page. This Blooper has nothing different in from generic Blooper (no physical difference/no different personnality). Despite being bigger, the game still calls it "Blooper" not "Giant Blooper" or something different that could characterized this Blooper as different. --(TALK) 18:56, 25 November 2016 (EST)
Is it possible to merge this back with the main Blooper article considering that RPG Gamer didn't create a proposal or discuss about this to split this Blooper from the main Blooper article?--(TALK) 18:24, 26 November 2016 (EST)